Portman M A, Beder S D, Cohen M H, Riemenschneider T A
Int J Cardiol. 1986 Apr;11(1):111-9. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(86)90205-6.
Since 1983 we have performed electrophysiologic studies in 6 patients who had previously undergone repair of an ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect. Information obtained during electrophysiologic studies was crucial in guiding appropriate pacemaker therapy in these patients. As judged from the resting electrocardiogram, sinus or junctional bradycardia was present in 3/6, atrial flutter / fibrillation in 2/6, and paced rhythm in 2 patients who had had ventricular pacemakers implanted for complete atrioventricular block. During maximal exercise testing 4 patients had reduced heart rates; 2 had sudden drops in heart rate at 1 min postexercise; 1 patient had exercise induced ventricular bigeminy; and 1 patient with atrial flutter and 2: 1-4: 1 block at rest developed 1: 1 conduction during Stage II with an effective ventricular rate of 220/min. During electrophysiologic studies, the maximum corrected sinus node recovery time was abnormal in five of the six, ranging from 410 to 5630 msec. There was no spontaneous atrial rhythm in the other patient. Complete atrioventricular block was present in 2 patients while the atrioventricular Wenckebach phenomenon occurred abnormally at atrial pacing cycle lengths greater than 450 msec in 2 others. Supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter/fibrillation, was either spontaneous or induced in 2/6 patients, while ventricular tachycardia was induced in 1/3 patients who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. Electrophysiologic studies were important in unmasking severe sinus node disease in 3 patients and atrioventricular node disease in 2. We therefore recommend that electrophysiologic studies be strongly considered as part of the evaluation of conduction abnormalities following repair of ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect.
自1983年以来,我们对6例曾接受过原发孔型房室间隔缺损修补术的患者进行了电生理研究。电生理研究中获得的信息对于指导这些患者进行适当的起搏器治疗至关重要。根据静息心电图判断,6例中有3例存在窦性或交界性心动过缓,2例存在心房扑动/颤动,2例因完全性房室传导阻滞植入心室起搏器,呈起搏心律。在最大运动试验期间,4例患者心率降低;2例在运动后1分钟心率突然下降;1例患者出现运动诱发的室性二联律;1例静息时存在心房扑动且2:1 - 4:1传导阻滞的患者在II期出现1:1传导,有效心室率达220次/分钟。在电生理研究中,6例中有5例最大校正窦房结恢复时间异常,范围为410至5630毫秒。另一例患者无自发心房节律。2例患者存在完全性房室传导阻滞,另外2例在心房起搏周期长度大于450毫秒时出现异常的房室文氏现象。2/6的患者出现了自发性或诱发性室上性心动过速或心房扑动/颤动,而在接受程控心室刺激的1/3患者中诱发了室性心动过速。电生理研究对于发现3例严重窦房结疾病和2例房室结疾病很重要。因此,我们建议强烈考虑将电生理研究作为原发孔型房室间隔缺损修补术后传导异常评估的一部分。