Bodard Sylvain, Razakamanantsoa Leo, Geevarghese Ruben, O'Gorman Julianne, Dohan Anthony, Marcelin Clement, Cornelis François H
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Insights Imaging. 2024 Nov 22;15(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01823-4.
To investigate over 10 years the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for the treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE).
A systematic review was conducted of literature published between March 2014 and March 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on treatment efficacy studies, while exclusion criteria targeted case reports and studies lacking pertinent outcome data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies.
A total of eight studies were included. Local pain scores decreased from a median of 8/10 (interquartile range (IQR) 7-9) on the visual analog scale to 1/10 (IQR 0-2) at the last follow-up (p < 0.0001). Median complete local pain response rates ranged from 80% to 100%, with median local pain-free survival rates reaching 76.8% (IQR 55.3-83.8) at the longest follow-up. Notably, no patient reported a post-procedure pain score higher than that they reported pre-cryoablation. The studies indicated minor complications in 3.5 to 11% of cases, with major complications occurring in less than 2% of cases, graded following the guidelines of the Society of Interventional Radiology.
In the last decade, percutaneous image-guided cryoablation has offered consistent results and appears to be a promising, minimally invasive option for AWE treatment. Prospective trials are now essential to establish cryoablation as a new standard in patient care for AWE.
Over a decade-long study, percutaneous cryoablation has proven to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for abdominal wall endometriosis, significantly reducing pain with minimal complications.
Percutaneous cryoablation significantly reduced local pain scores for abdominal wall endometriosis. The procedure demonstrated a favorable safety profile with minor complications. Cryoablation has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional treatments.
在超过10年的时间里研究经皮冷冻消融治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症(AWE)的安全性和有效性。
对2014年3月至2024年3月发表的文献进行系统综述。纳入标准侧重于治疗效果研究,而排除标准针对病例报告和缺乏相关结局数据的研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对队列研究的方法学质量进行评估。
共纳入八项研究。局部疼痛评分从视觉模拟量表上的中位数8/10(四分位间距(IQR)7 - 9)降至最后一次随访时的1/10(IQR 0 - 2)(p < 0.0001)。局部完全疼痛缓解率中位数在80%至100%之间,最长随访时局部无疼痛生存率中位数达到76.8%(IQR 55.3 - 83.8)。值得注意的是,没有患者报告术后疼痛评分高于冷冻消融术前。研究表明,3.5%至11%的病例出现轻微并发症,不到2%的病例出现严重并发症,按照介入放射学会的指南分级。
在过去十年中,经皮图像引导下冷冻消融取得了一致的结果,似乎是一种有前景的、微创的AWE治疗选择。现在进行前瞻性试验对于将冷冻消融确立为AWE患者护理的新标准至关重要。
经过长达十年的研究,经皮冷冻消融已被证明是治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症的一种安全有效的微创治疗方法,能显著减轻疼痛且并发症极少。
经皮冷冻消融显著降低了腹壁子宫内膜异位症的局部疼痛评分。该手术显示出良好的安全性,并发症轻微。冷冻消融已成为传统治疗的一种微创替代方法。