• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同球囊血管成形术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者腘下动脉病变的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Balloon Angioplasty Procedures for Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Guo Zelin, Guo Julong, Wu Sensen, Zhang Fan, Gao Xixiang, Guo Lianrui

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Nov 23:15266028241292954. doi: 10.1177/15266028241292954.

DOI:10.1177/15266028241292954
PMID:39578965
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal endovascular method to treat infrapopliteal chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) remains to be determined, given the limitations of stent use in infrapopliteal artery disease. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to simultaneously compare the outcomes of different balloon angioplasty procedures for infrapopliteal artery lesions in CLTI patients.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed. 8 eligible RCTs involving 3 endovascular modalities or combinations (plain old balloon angioplasty [POBA], drug-coated balloon [DCB], orbital atherectomy plus plain old balloon angioplasty [OA+POBA]) were included. Primary outcomes were efficacy (12-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization [CDTLR]) and safety (12-month major amputation and all-cause mortality). We used random-effects models based on the frequentist framework.

RESULTS

Plain old balloon angioplasty had a higher 12-month CDTLR rate than DCB (relative risk [RR]: 2.11, confidence interval [CI]: 1.33, 3.34) in the NWM and this result was still statistically significant (RR: 0.47, CI: 0.30, 0.75) in subgroup analyses. According to the SUCRA value, in terms of 12-month CDTLR, OA+POBA was considered the best treatment (SUCRA=72.2), while POBA was considered the worst treatment (SUCRA=8.9). In terms of 12-month all-cause mortality, OA+POBA was considered the best treatment (SUCRA=95.0), while DCB was considered the worst treatment (SUCRA=12.8). In terms of 12-month major amputation, POBA was considered the best treatment (SUCRA=72.0), while DCB was considered the worst treatment (SUCRA=23.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In infrapopliteal CLTI disease, DCB showed a significantly lower 12-month CDTLR in comparison to POBA. There is no statistically significant evidence to suggest that DCB raises safety concerns. The SUCRA values of OA+POBA indicate that it might offer a superior treatment option compared to DCB or POBA in terms of CDTLR and mortality. This advantage, however, was not sustained when major-amputation rates were analyzed. Consequently, further RCTs are required to examine the potential benefits of OA and other forms of atherectomy for managing infrapopliteal CLTI disease.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The findings of this study provide further evidence for the safety of DCB in the application of infrapopliteal CLTI disease and suggest preliminary benefits of atherectomy. These results are likely to encourage further research and application of these treatment modalities in managing infrapopliteal CLTI.POBA has been a traditional approach for treating infrapopliteal artery disease. The current evidence supports clinicians in exploring and utilizing DCB and atherectomy as better treatments.We focused on the performance of different balloon angioplasty procedures in infrapopliteal CLTI, considering the characteristics of infrapopliteal CLTI.

摘要

背景

鉴于支架在腘下动脉疾病应用中的局限性,治疗腘下慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)的最佳血管内治疗方法仍有待确定。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了网状Meta分析(NWM),以同时比较CLTI患者腘下动脉病变不同球囊血管成形术的疗效。

方法

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Embase和PubMed。纳入了8项符合条件的RCT,涉及3种血管内治疗方式或联合治疗(普通球囊血管成形术[POBA]、药物涂层球囊[DCB]、轨道斑块旋切术联合普通球囊血管成形术[OA+POBA])。主要结局为疗效(12个月临床驱动的靶病变血运重建[CDTLR])和安全性(12个月大截肢和全因死亡率)。我们使用基于频率论框架的随机效应模型。

结果

在网状Meta分析中,普通球囊血管成形术的12个月CDTLR率高于药物涂层球囊(相对风险[RR]:2.11,置信区间[CI]:1.33,3.34),该结果在亚组分析中仍具有统计学意义(RR:0.47,CI:0.30,)。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值,就12个月CDTLR而言,OA+POBA被认为是最佳治疗方法(SUCRA=72.2),而POBA被认为是最差治疗方法(SUCRA=8.9)。就12个月全因死亡率而言,OA+POBA被认为是最佳治疗方法(SUCRA=95.0),而DCB被认为是最差治疗方法(SUCRA=12.8)。就12个月大截肢而言,POBA被认为是最佳治疗方法(SUCRA=72.0),而DCB被认为是最差治疗方法(SUCRA=23.0)。

结论

在腘下CLTI疾病中,与POBA相比,DCB的12个月CDTLR显著更低。没有统计学显著证据表明DCB存在安全问题。OA+POBA的SUCRA值表明,就CDTLR和死亡率而言,与DCB或POBA相比,它可能提供更好的治疗选择。然而,在分析大截肢率时,这种优势并未持续。因此,需要进一步的RCT来研究OA和其他形式的斑块旋切术在治疗腘下CLTI疾病中的潜在益处。

临床影响

本研究结果为DCB在腘下CLTI疾病应用中的安全性提供了进一步证据,并表明了斑块旋切术的初步益处。这些结果可能会鼓励在治疗腘下CLTI时进一步研究和应用这些治疗方式。POBA一直是治疗腘下动脉疾病的传统方法。目前的证据支持临床医生探索和使用DCB和斑块旋切术作为更好的治疗方法。我们考虑腘下CLTI的特点,重点研究了不同球囊血管成形术在腘下CLTI中的表现。

相似文献

1
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Balloon Angioplasty Procedures for Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.不同球囊血管成形术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者腘下动脉病变的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Nov 23:15266028241292954. doi: 10.1177/15266028241292954.
2
The efficacy and safety of different endovascular modalities for infrapopliteal arteries lesions: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同血管内治疗方式对腘动脉以下动脉病变的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 9;9:993290. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.993290. eCollection 2022.
3
Vessel Preparation in Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.《主-髂动脉疾病腔内治疗中国专家共识》要点 **关键词**:主-髂动脉疾病;腔内治疗;专家共识 **摘要**:目的 对主-髂动脉疾病腔内治疗的中国专家共识进行总结,为临床实践提供指导。方法 采用循证医学的方法,对国内外发表的相关文献进行检索和分析,结合专家的临床经验和意见,制定了共识的推荐意见。结果 共识共包括 23 条推荐意见,涵盖了主-髂动脉疾病的流行病学、诊断、治疗策略、腔内治疗技术、围手术期管理等方面。结论 本共识为中国医生提供了主-髂动脉疾病腔内治疗的规范化建议,有助于提高治疗效果和改善患者预后。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Apr;31(2):191-202. doi: 10.1177/15266028221120752. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
4
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Atherectomy Plus Balloon Angioplasty Versus Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease.腘下动脉疾病:斑块旋切术联合球囊血管成形术与单纯球囊血管成形术的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Nov 7:15266028231209236. doi: 10.1177/15266028231209236.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):647-657. doi: 10.1177/1526602820931559. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
6
Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.血管成形术与支架置入术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的腘下动脉病变
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 8;12(12):CD009195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009195.pub2.
7
Comparison of Different Endovascular Treatments of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.股浅动脉支架内再狭窄的不同腔内治疗方法比较:系统评价和贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;104:205-216. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.081. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
8
Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty of Infrapopliteal Lesions in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Six-month Outcomes of PRIME-WIFI.药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的腘下病变:PRIME-WIFI研究的6个月结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Nov 3:15266028231208646. doi: 10.1177/15266028231208646.
9
Comparison of outcomes for balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, and stenting in the treatment of infrapopliteal disease for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.球囊血管成形术、斑块旋切术和支架置入术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血性腘下病变的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
10
Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing the Outcomes of Different Endovascular Revascularisation Treatments for Infra-inguinal Peripheral Arterial Disease Causing Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析比较了不同腔内血管重建治疗方法治疗导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的下肢周围动脉疾病的结局。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Aug;68(2):246-254. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.014. Epub 2024 May 14.