Zhao Qi, Feng Qiushi, Seow Wei Jie
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
J Hazard Mater. 2025 Jan 15;482:136507. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136507. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
The association between air pollution and depressive symptoms has not been thoroughly investigated, and the role of physical activity (PA) is particularly unclear. Although PA has been shown to alleviate depression, it may also increase exposure to air pollution, potentially exacerbating its adverse effects. A total of 17,332 participants aged 45 years and older from the 2018 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were included in this study to assess the causal effect of air pollution on depressive symptoms in China and to clarify the role of PA in this relationship. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Data on particulate matter (PM, PM, and PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO), sulfur dioxide (SO), ozone (O), and carbon monoxide (CO) were obtained from the ChinaHighAirPollutants (CHAP) dataset. PA levels were measured using a standardized questionnaire and categorized as low or high. An instrumental variable (IV) approach was used to estimate the causal effect of air pollution on depressive symptoms. Potential effect modification by PA was assessed. The IV estimates showed that all air pollutants were significantly and adversely associated with depressive symptoms, with a per interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM, PM, PM, NO, SO, O, and CO associated with 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15, 1.99), 1.49 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.89), 1.71 (95% CI: 1.26, 2.17), 2.22 (95% CI: 1.62, 2.81), 1.30 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.65), 4.67 (95% CI: 3.37, 5.98), and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.22) units increase in CES-D scores, respectively. PA significantly modified this association, with higher PA levels mitigating the adverse effects of air pollution on depressive symptoms.
空气污染与抑郁症状之间的关联尚未得到充分研究,而身体活动(PA)的作用尤其不明确。尽管已表明身体活动可缓解抑郁,但它也可能增加空气污染暴露,从而可能加剧其不良影响。本研究纳入了中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2018年调查周期中的17332名45岁及以上参与者,以评估空气污染对中国抑郁症状的因果效应,并阐明身体活动在这种关系中的作用。使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)评估抑郁症状。关于颗粒物(PM、PM和PM)、二氧化氮(NO)、二氧化硫(SO)、臭氧(O)和一氧化碳(CO)的数据来自中国高空气污染物(CHAP)数据集。使用标准化问卷测量身体活动水平,并将其分为低或高。采用工具变量(IV)方法估计空气污染对抑郁症状的因果效应。评估了身体活动对潜在效应的修正作用。工具变量估计显示,所有空气污染物均与抑郁症状存在显著的负相关,PM、PM、PM、NO、SO、O和CO每增加一个四分位数间距(IQR),CES-D得分分别增加1.57(95%置信区间(CI):1.15,1.99)、1.49(95%CI:1.10,1.89)、1.71(95%CI:1.26,2.17)、2.22(95%CI:1.62,2.81)、1.30(95%CI:0.96,1.65)、4.67(95%CI:3.37,5.98)和0.97(95%CI:0.71,1.22)单位。身体活动显著修正了这种关联,较高的身体活动水平减轻了空气污染对抑郁症状的不良影响。