Donnermeyer David, Matern Johannes, Prior Karola, Ibing Madgalena, Hagenfeld Daniel, Schäfer Edgar, Bürklein Sebastian, Harmsen Dag, Ehmke Benjamin
Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
J Endod. 2025 Feb;51(2):164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.11.007. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
The aim was to evaluate the suitability of paper points or endodontic nickel-titanium files to sample microorganisms for in vivo investigation of endodontic microbiota by 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing.
Forty-five patients presenting clinical and radiological signs of apical periodontitis were recruited for sampling, giving their written informed consent. Glide paths were assessed using C-Pilot Files and K-Files under electronic root canal length control under aseptic conditions. Microbial samples were taken from 84 root canals in duplicate, the first sample with a sterile paper point (size 15), the second with a sterile file (size 20/.06). After DNA extraction, the hypervariable region V4 of the bacterial 16 S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced (Illumina MiSeq). Sequencing data were trimmed with Cutadapt and exact amplicon sequence variants generated by DADA2. Taxonomy was assigned based on the Human Oral Microbiome Database (eHOMD). Statistical analysis of diversity parameters comprised Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Compositional differences were evaluated by differential abundance analysis (DESeq2). Microbial contamination during the sampling process and analysis were evaluated.
Concerning alpha diversity, richness and dissimilarity differed nonsignificantly between paper point and instrument samples (P > .05), whereas a significant difference was observed in the Shannon index (P < .05). Regarding beta diversity, paper point and instrument samples presented with similar microbial community compositions (P = 1.0, PERMANOVA). Paper point controls contained significantly higher proportions of Pseudomonadales (P < .05).
Paper point and endodontic instrument sampling generate valid specimens for 16S rDNA community profiling. Endodontic instrument sampling is easier to execute and, therefore, could be the technique of choice.
本研究旨在评估纸尖或根管治疗镍钛锉用于通过16S核糖体DNA(rDNA)测序对根管微生物群进行体内研究时采集微生物样本的适用性。
招募了45例有根尖周炎临床和影像学表现的患者进行样本采集,并获得了他们的书面知情同意书。在无菌条件下,使用C-Pilot锉和K锉在电子根管长度控制下评估引导通路。从84个根管中重复采集微生物样本,第一个样本用无菌纸尖(15号)采集,第二个样本用无菌锉(20/.06号)采集。DNA提取后,扩增并测序细菌16S rRNA基因的高变区V4(Illumina MiSeq)。测序数据用Cutadapt进行修剪,并用DADA2生成精确的扩增子序列变体。基于人类口腔微生物组数据库(eHOMD)进行分类。对多样性参数的统计分析包括Wilcoxon符号秩检验和置换方差分析(PERMANOVA)。通过差异丰度分析(DESeq2)评估成分差异。评估了采样过程和分析过程中的微生物污染情况。
关于α多样性,纸尖样本和器械样本之间的丰富度和差异无显著差异(P>.05),而香农指数存在显著差异(P<.05)。关于β多样性,纸尖样本和器械样本呈现出相似的微生物群落组成(P = 1.0,PERMANOVA)。纸尖对照样本中假单胞菌目的比例显著更高(P<.05)。
纸尖和根管器械采样可为16S rDNA群落分析生成有效的样本。根管器械采样执行起来更容易,因此可能是首选技术。