Kim Hyun Gon, Kim Su Cheol, Park Jong Hun, Kim Jae Soo, Suh Dong Hun, Lee Sang Min, Yoo Jae Chul
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2200-2210. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.069. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
To compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between biceps anchor tenodesis (AT), biceps soft-tissue tenodesis (ST), and biceps tenotomy (TT) for patients with concomitant rotator cuff repair (RCR).
This retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR for full-thickness rotator cuff tears with AT, ST, or TT with minimum 2-year follow-up. All biceps procedures were performed arthroscopically, and ST consisted of fixation to the transverse humeral ligament. We excluded massive rotator cuff tears, additional biceps procedures, and revisions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (visual analog scale [VAS] pain score, VAS functional score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant score) and elbow flexion (EF) strength were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up.
A total of 155 patients (50 AT, 52 ST, and 53 TT patients) were included in this study. The AT group was younger (mean age, 58.7 ± 6.3 years in AT group, 67.6 ± 5.0 years in ST group, and 66.1 ± 5.3 years in TT group) and had a lower proportion of female patients (13 [26.0%] in AT group, 31 [59.6%] in ST group, 39 [73.6%] in TT group) than the ST and TT groups (all P < .001). At final follow-up, PROM scores were significantly improved in all 3 groups (all P < .001). The VAS pain score (P = .134), VAS functional score (P = .616), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .093) at final follow-up showed no significant differences between the 3 groups. The Constant score and EF strength were significantly higher in the AT group than in the ST and TT groups preoperatively (P = .009 for Constant score, P = .033 for EF strength) and at final follow-up (P < .001 for Constant score, P < .001 for EF strength). There was no significant difference in mean improvement in PROM scores and EF strength or in the proportion of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference. The incidence of Popeye deformity was significantly higher in the TT group (n = 11, 20.8%) than in the AT group (n = 3, 5.8%) and ST group (n = 4, 8.0%) (P = .035). Regression analysis showed that TT (odds ratio, 15.6; P < .001) and male sex (odds ratio, 103.9; P < .001) were associated with Popeye deformity and that ST (coefficient, -0.51; P = .035) was associated with bicipital groove pain.
Biceps AT, ST, and TT during arthroscopic RCR showed good clinical outcomes. Although there was a possibility of selection bias, there was no significant difference in mean improvement in clinical outcomes between the 3 long head of the biceps tendon procedures. The incidence of Popeye deformity was higher in the TT group, and that of biceps groove pain was higher in the ST group.
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
比较在同时进行肩袖修复(RCR)的患者中,肱二头肌锚定腱固定术(AT)、肱二头肌软组织腱固定术(ST)和肱二头肌肌腱切断术(TT)的临床和影像学结果。
这项回顾性研究纳入了接受关节镜下RCR治疗全层肩袖撕裂并接受AT、ST或TT治疗且随访至少2年的患者。所有肱二头肌手术均通过关节镜进行,ST包括固定于肱骨横韧带。我们排除了巨大肩袖撕裂、额外的肱二头肌手术和翻修手术。术前及末次随访时评估患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)(视觉模拟量表[VAS]疼痛评分、VAS功能评分、美国肩肘外科医师评分和Constant评分)以及肘关节屈曲(EF)力量。
本研究共纳入155例患者(50例AT患者、52例ST患者和53例TT患者)。AT组患者较年轻(AT组平均年龄58.7±6.3岁,ST组67.6±5.0岁,TT组66.1±5.3岁),女性患者比例低于ST组和TT组(AT组13例[26.0%],ST组31例[59.6%],TT组39例[73.6%])(所有P<.001)。在末次随访时,所有3组的PROM评分均显著改善(所有P<.001)。末次随访时的VAS疼痛评分(P = .134)、VAS功能评分(P = .616)和美国肩肘外科医师评分(P = .093)在3组之间无显著差异。术前(Constant评分为P = .009,EF力量为P = .033)及末次随访时(Constant评分为P<.001,EF力量为P<.001),AT组的Constant评分和EF力量显著高于ST组和TT组。PROM评分和EF力量的平均改善情况以及达到最小临床重要差异的比例在3组之间无显著差异。“大力水手”畸形的发生率在TT组(n = 11,20.8%)显著高于AT组(n = 3,5.8%)和ST组(n = 4,8.0%)(P = .035)。回归分析显示,TT(比值比,15.6;P<.001)和男性(比值比,103.9;P<.001)与“大力水手”畸形相关,而ST(系数,-0.51;P = .035)与肱二头肌沟疼痛相关。
关节镜下RCR期间进行肱二头肌AT、ST和TT显示出良好的临床结果。尽管存在选择偏倚的可能性,但肱二头肌肌腱长头的3种手术在临床结局的平均改善方面无显著差异。“大力水手”畸形的发生率在TT组较高,肱二头肌沟疼痛的发生率在ST组较高。
III级,回顾性队列研究。