Martin Adam R, Li Guangrui, Cui Boya, Mariani Rachel O, Vicario Kale, Cathline Kimberley A, Findlay Allison, Robertson Gavin
Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.
Horticultural & Environmental Sciences Innovation Centre, Niagara College, Welland, Canada.
Plant Methods. 2024 Nov 24;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01304-1.
Quantifying drought tolerance in crops is critical for agriculture management under environmental change, and drought response traits in grape vine have long been the focus of viticultural research. Turgor loss point (π) is gaining attention as an indicator of drought tolerance in plants, though estimating π often requires the construction and analysis of pressure-volume (P-V) curves which are very time consuming. While P-V curves remain a valuable tool for assessing π and related traits, there is considerable interest in developing high-throughput methods for rapidly estimating π, especially in the context of crop screening. We tested the ability of a dewpoint hygrometer to quantify variation in π across and within 12 clones of grape vine (Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera) and one wild relative (Vitis riparia), and compared these results to those derived from P-V curves. At the leaf-level, methodology explained only 4-5% of the variation in π while clone/species identity accounted for 39% of the variation, indicating that both methods are sensitive to detecting intraspecific π variation in grape vine. Also at the leaf level, π measured using a dewpoint hygrometer approximated π values (r = 0.254) and conserved π rankings from P-V curves (Spearman's ρ = 0.459). While the leaf-level datasets differed statistically from one another (paired t-test p = 0.01), average difference in π for a given pair of leaves was small (0.1 ± 0.2 MPa (s.d.)). At the species/clone level, estimates of π measured by the two methods were also statistically correlated (r = 0.304), did not deviate statistically from a 1:1 relationship, and conserved π rankings across clones (Spearman's ρ = 0.692). The dewpoint hygrometer (taking ∼ 10-15 min on average per measurement) captures fine-scale intraspecific variation in π, with results that approximate those from P-V curves (taking 2-3 h on average per measurement). The dewpoint hygrometer represents a viable method for rapidly estimating intraspecific variation in π, and potentially greatly increasing replication when estimating this drought tolerance trait in grape vine and other crops.
量化作物的耐旱性对于环境变化下的农业管理至关重要,葡萄的干旱响应性状长期以来一直是葡萄栽培研究的重点。膨压丧失点(π)作为植物耐旱性的一个指标正受到关注,不过估算π通常需要构建和分析压力 - 容积(P - V)曲线,这非常耗时。虽然P - V曲线仍然是评估π及相关性状的宝贵工具,但人们对开发快速估算π的高通量方法有浓厚兴趣,尤其是在作物筛选的背景下。我们测试了露点湿度计量化12个葡萄(欧亚葡萄亚种)克隆和一个野生近缘种(河岸葡萄)之间及内部π变化的能力,并将这些结果与从P - V曲线得出的结果进行比较。在叶片水平上,该方法仅解释了π变化的4 - 5%,而克隆/物种身份占变化的39%,这表明两种方法对检测葡萄种内π变化都很敏感。同样在叶片水平上,使用露点湿度计测量的π接近P - V曲线的π值(r = 0.254),并且保留了P - V曲线的π排名(斯皮尔曼ρ = 0.459)。虽然叶片水平的数据集在统计学上彼此不同(配对t检验p = 0.01),但给定一对叶片的π平均差异很小(0.1±0.2 MPa(标准差))。在物种/克隆水平上,两种方法测量的π估计值在统计学上也具有相关性(r = 0.304),与1:1关系在统计学上没有偏差,并且保留了各克隆间的π排名(斯皮尔曼ρ = 0.692)。露点湿度计(每次测量平均约需10 - 15分钟)能够捕捉π的种内精细尺度变化,其结果与P - V曲线(每次测量平均需2 - 3小时)的结果相近。露点湿度计是一种快速估算π种内变化的可行方法,在估算葡萄和其他作物的这种耐旱性状时可能会大大增加重复次数。