Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kettering Health, Kettering, Ohio.
Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.
Tex Heart Inst J. 2024 Nov 22;51(2):e238304. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-23-8304. eCollection 2024 Jul-Dec.
Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is quickly becoming a routine and effective means by which to treat degenerated bioprosthetic valves. A known complication of ViV-TAVI is patient-prosthesis mismatch, which substantially affects survival. Bioprosthetic valve fracture is a method by which to reduce the risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch and post-ViV-TAVI transvalvular gradients. This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of post-ViV-TAVI bioprosthetic valve fracture.
Patients with a history of surgical aortic valve replacement undergoing ViV-TAVI bioprosthetic valve fracture (N = 25) at the corresponding institution from 2015 to 2022 were cataloged for a retrospective analysis. The implanted transcatheter valves were Medtronic Evolut R, Evolut PRO, and Evolut PRO+. Gradients were assessed before and after implantation and after fracturing using transthoracic echocardiogram.
The mean left ventricular ejection fraction of patients who underwent fracturing was 55.04%. The average (SD) peak and mean (SD) transvalvular gradients before the intervention were 68.17 (19.09) mm Hg and 38.98 (14.37) mm Hg, respectively. After ViV-TAVI, the same gradients were reduced to 27.25 (12.27) mm Hg and 15.63 (6.47) mm Hg, respectively. After bioprosthetic valve fracture, the gradients further decreased to 17.59 (7.93) mm Hg and 8.860 (3.334) mm Hg, respectively. The average reduction in peak gradient associated with fracturing was 12.07 mm Hg (95% CI, 5.73-18.41 mm Hg; = .001). The average reduction in mean gradient associated with valve fracturing was 6.97 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.99-9.74 mm Hg; < .001).
Bioprosthetic valve fracture is a viable option for reducing residual transvalvular gradients after ViV-TAVI and should be considered in patients with elevated gradients (>20 mm Hg) or with concern for patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients who have an unacceptable risk for a redo sternotomy and surgical aortic valve replacement.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)中的经瓣中瓣(ViV)技术正迅速成为治疗退行性生物瓣的常规有效手段。ViV-TAVI 的一个已知并发症是患者-瓣叶不匹配,这极大地影响了生存率。生物瓣叶骨折是降低患者-瓣叶不匹配和 ViV-TAVI 后跨瓣梯度风险的一种方法。本研究旨在确定 ViV-TAVI 后生物瓣叶骨折的安全性和有效性。
对 2015 年至 2022 年在相应机构接受 ViV-TAVI 生物瓣叶骨折(N=25)的既往接受过主动脉瓣置换术的患者进行回顾性分析。植入的经导管瓣膜为美敦力 Evolut R、Evolut PRO 和 Evolut PRO+。使用经胸超声心动图在植入前、植入后和骨折后评估梯度。
接受骨折术的患者的左心室射血分数平均为 55.04%。干预前,峰值和平均跨瓣梯度分别为 68.17(19.09)mmHg 和 38.98(14.37)mmHg。ViV-TAVI 后,同一梯度分别降低至 27.25(12.27)mmHg 和 15.63(6.47)mmHg。生物瓣叶骨折后,梯度进一步降低至 17.59(7.93)mmHg 和 8.860(3.334)mmHg。与骨折相关的峰值梯度平均降低 12.07 mmHg(95%CI,5.73-18.41 mmHg;P=.001)。与瓣膜骨折相关的平均梯度平均降低 6.97 mmHg(95%CI,3.99-9.74 mmHg;P<.001)。
生物瓣叶骨折是降低 ViV-TAVI 后残余跨瓣梯度的可行选择,对于跨瓣梯度升高(>20mmHg)或对于再次开胸和外科主动脉瓣置换术风险不可接受的患者,存在患者-瓣叶不匹配的患者,应考虑进行生物瓣叶骨折。