Revankar Gajanan S, Ozono Tatsuhiko, Suzuki Maki, Kanemoto Hideki, Furuya Kota, Shigenobu Kazue, Yoshiyama Kenji, Yamamoto Yuki, Ogasawara Issei, Yoshida Natsuki, Iwasaki Susumu, Saeki Chizu, Nishio Yoshiyuki, Nakatani Daisaku, Asai Kanako, Kajiyama Yuta, Shimizu Mikito, Hayashi Tatsuya, Taniguchi Seira, Suzuki Yu, Inada Rino, Taminato Tomoya, Nagai Yoshitaka, Hashimoto Mamoru, Ikeda Manabu, Mori Etsuro, Mochizuki Hideki, Nakata Ken
Center for Global Health, Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 8;10(22):e40254. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40254. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
Pareidolias refer to visual perceptual deficits where ambiguous shapes take on meaningful appearances. In neurodegenerative diseases, pareidolias are examined via a paper-based neuropsychological tool called the noise pareidolia test. In this study, we present initial findings regarding the utilization of pareidolia test on a digital format to analyze variations between paper-based and digital testing approaches. We performed our experiments on healthy controls, patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Dementia with Lewy body disease (DLB) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Baseline MMSE assessments were conducted, followed by pareidolia testing using both paper-based tools and smartphones. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between the two methods. We found that the illusionary phenomenon of pareidolia is consistent across paper and digital modalities of testing; that perceptual constancy is maintained across patient groups despite variations in image sizes; and pareidolic misperceptions, to some extent, are stabilized on a digital format. Our findings demonstrate a practical way of testing pareidolias on smartphones without compromising on the functionality of the test.
空想性错视是指视觉感知缺陷,即模糊的形状呈现出有意义的外观。在神经退行性疾病中,通过一种名为噪声空想性错视测试的纸质神经心理学工具来检查空想性错视。在本研究中,我们展示了关于使用数字格式的空想性错视测试来分析纸质测试方法和数字测试方法之间差异的初步结果。我们对健康对照者、被诊断患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)、路易体痴呆(DLB)和帕金森病(PD)的患者进行了实验。进行了基线简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评估,随后使用纸质工具和智能手机进行空想性错视测试。进行了布兰德-奥特曼分析以评估两种方法之间的一致性。我们发现,空想性错视的错觉现象在纸质和数字测试方式中是一致的;尽管图像大小不同,但在各患者组中感知恒常性得以保持;并且空想性错视在某种程度上在数字格式中是稳定的。我们的研究结果展示了一种在智能手机上测试空想性错视的实用方法,同时不影响测试的功能。