Malallah Ali Dhahee, Hasan Nadia H, Qasim Mohammed Hazim
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Int J Dent. 2024 Nov 15;2024:2540174. doi: 10.1155/2024/2540174. eCollection 2024.
Careful selection of materials and resin cement shade can minimize color changes in laminate veneers. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of two ceramic material types, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic material (Ivoclar, Schaan/Liechtenstein; IPS e.max), computer aided design (CAD) and IPS e.max Press, and four different resin cement shades on color changes in lithium disilicate ceramic laminate veneers. Forty extracted human maxillary first premolars were prepared to receive a laminate veneer. Optical scanning and digital designing were used to prepare 20 IPS e.max CAD and 20 IPS e.max Press veneer samples. These samples were divided into four groups based on resin cement shade and material: Group CAD A1 : (IPS e.max CAD with A1 cement shade), Group CAD T : (IPS e.max CAD with translucent cement shade), Group CAD M : (IPS e.max CAD with milky bright cement shade), Group CAD B1 : (IPS e.max CAD with B1 cement shade) and the same divisions for IPS e.max Press. Before cementation, color measurements were obtained using precision colorimeter NR110. After cementation, the (color change) value was recorded and tabulated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's post hoc test were used to evaluate the influence of ceramic material types and cement shade on . There were significant differences between the IPS e.max CAD and e.max Press veneers for the four tested cement shades. The highest color change was observed in press M veneers (8.84 ± 0.63931) while the lowest color change was observed in CAD M veneers (0.5 ± 0.16371). There were significant differences in color change based on cement shade, with B1 showing the greatest change (8.84 ± 0.47440 for Press veneers and 2.3 ± 0.11992 for CAD veneers). Different shades of resin cements and different manufacturing techniques produce different levels of color changes therefore careful selection of materials and cement shade can minimize color changes in laminate veneers.
仔细选择材料和树脂水门汀的色度可以使瓷贴面的颜色变化最小化。本研究旨在评估两种陶瓷材料类型,即二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷材料(义获嘉,沙恩/列支敦士登;IPS e.max)、计算机辅助设计(CAD)和IPS e.max Press,以及四种不同的树脂水门汀色度对二硅酸锂陶瓷贴面颜色变化的影响。选取40颗拔除的人类上颌第一前磨牙,预备进行瓷贴面修复。采用光学扫描和数字设计制备20个IPS e.max CAD和20个IPS e.max Press贴面样本。这些样本根据树脂水门汀色度和材料分为四组:CAD A1组:(IPS e.max CAD搭配A1水门汀色度),CAD T组:(IPS e.max CAD搭配半透明水门汀色度),CAD M组:(IPS e.max CAD搭配乳白亮色水门汀色度),CAD B1组:(IPS e.max CAD搭配B1水门汀色度),IPS e.max Press也进行同样分组。在粘结前,使用精密色差仪NR110进行颜色测量。粘结后,记录并列表(颜色变化)值。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和邓肯事后检验来评估陶瓷材料类型和水门汀色度对(颜色变化)的影响。对于四种测试的水门汀色度,IPS e.max CAD和e.max Press贴面之间存在显著差异。压制M贴面的颜色变化最高(8.84±0.63931),而CAD M贴面的颜色变化最低(0.5±0.16371)。基于水门汀色度的颜色变化存在显著差异,B1显示出最大变化(压制贴面为8.84±0.47440,CAD贴面为2.3±0.11992)。不同色度的树脂水门汀和不同的制造技术会产生不同程度的颜色变化,因此仔细选择材料和水门汀色度可以使瓷贴面的颜色变化最小化。