Arar Morsi, Martens Andreas, Rudolph Linda, Krueger Heike, Arar Victoria, Beckmann Erik, Shrestha Malakh, Kaufeld Tim
Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Germany Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, USA.
Perfusion. 2025 Sep;40(6):1439-1447. doi: 10.1177/02676591241303325. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
ObjectiveAcute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is a condition that affects both genders and requires urgent surgical intervention as non-operative treatment is often associated with a poor prognosis. Studies have proven that less aggressive surgical treatments influence the outcome for female patients in the fields of several diseases. The purpose of this study was to report and analyze our results in the selective cohort of female patients with AADA to detect differences in the treatment of this group of patients.MethodsBetween January 2000 and July 2018, 141 adult female patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) underwent repair of the aorta in our department. A total of 75 patients received a proximal arch. replacement (group A), and 66 patients received a subtotal (replacement of the brachiocephalic trunk) and/or total arch. replacement with elephant trunk or frozen elephant trunk (group B).ResultsThe median age in group A was 70.7 years (range 60.7-74.7 years) and in group B 66.3 years (range 55.6-71.3 years). Operation times were significantly longer in group B (total operation time: A = 286.9 min (range 225.0-341.0 min), B = 341 min (range 266.0-392 min), = .003; cardiopulmonary bypass time: A = 189.0 min (range 139.0-138 min), B = 238 min (range 176.8-300.5 min), < .001; circulatory arrest time: A = 27.0 min (range 21.0-37.0 min), B = 42.0 min (range 32.0-56.3 min), < .001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding 30-day mortality (A = 24% ( = 18), B = 19.7% ( = 13), = .538) and rate of reoperation (A = 13.3% ( = 10), B = 15.2% ( = 10), = .757) or the preoperative characteristics.ConclusionOur study showed no significant difference in mortality rate depending on the type of operation. Based on these results, a proximal arch. replacement should be considered as the first line of operation technique if the individual situation allows. For inexperienced clinics and surgeons in particular, we recommend limited aortic repair in patients with AADA. Finally, location of the intimal tear remains the essential factor for the evaluation of the surgical treat.
目的
急性A型主动脉夹层(AADA)是一种影响两性的疾病,由于非手术治疗往往预后较差,因此需要紧急手术干预。研究表明,在几种疾病领域中,不太积极的手术治疗会影响女性患者的预后。本研究的目的是报告和分析我们在选择性的女性AADA患者队列中的结果,以检测该组患者治疗上的差异。
方法
2000年1月至2018年7月,141例成年女性急性主动脉夹层(AAD)患者在我科接受了主动脉修复术。共有75例患者接受了近端主动脉弓置换(A组),66例患者接受了次全(头臂干置换)和/或全主动脉弓置换加象鼻或冰冻象鼻术(B组)。
结果
A组患者中位年龄为70.7岁(范围60.7 - 74.7岁),B组为66.3岁(范围55.6 - 71.3岁)。B组手术时间明显更长(总手术时间:A组 = 286.9分钟(范围225.0 - 341.0分钟),B组 = 341分钟(范围266.0 - 392分钟),P = 0.003;体外循环时间:A组 = 189.0分钟(范围139.0 - 238分钟),B组 = 238分钟(范围176.8 - 300.5分钟);P <0.001;循环阻断时间:A组 = 27.0分钟(范围21.0 - 37.0分钟),B组 = 42.0分钟(范围32.0 - 56.3分钟);P <0.001)。两组在30天死亡率(A组 = 24%(n = 18),B组 = 19.7%(n = 13),P = 0.538)、再次手术率(A组 = 13.3%(n = 10),B组 = 15.2%(n = 10),P = 0.757)或术前特征方面无显著差异。
结论
我们的研究表明,手术方式不同,死亡率无显著差异。基于这些结果,如果个体情况允许,近端主动脉弓置换应被视为手术技术的首选。特别是对于经验不足的诊所和外科医生,我们建议对AADA患者进行有限主动脉修复。最后内膜撕裂的位置仍然是评估手术治疗的关键因素。