• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域身体成分和力量,而非总体身体成分,是登山者运动表现的决定因素。

Regional Body Composition and Strength, Not Total Body Composition, Are Determinants of Performance in Climbers.

作者信息

Carrasco Fernando, Arias-Tellez Maria Jose, Solar-Altamirano Ignacio, Inostroza Jorge, Carrasco Gabriela

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Independence 1027, Santiago 8380000, Chile.

Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Nov 12;9(4):228. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040228.

DOI:10.3390/jfmk9040228
PMID:39584881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11587076/
Abstract

To compare the body composition of Chilean climbers of different performance levels and to determine the relation between the forearm and upper-trunk lean mass and the handgrip and upper-body traction strength, respectively. A cross-sectional study was carried out on thirty Chilean male adult climbers (26.1 ± 4.9 y.): nine of intermediate level (L1), eleven advanced (L2), and ten elite (L3). Through dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA; Lunar Prodigy), fat mass percentage (FM%), total lean mass (LM), forearm lean mass (FLM), and upper-trunk lean mass (UTLM) were measured. Total muscle mass (TMM) was also estimated. Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured with a Jamar dynamometer. Maximum upper-body traction strength (UBTS) was evaluated with a standardized movement. The level of climbing was assessed according to IRCRA rules. No differences in FM%, total LM, UTLM, or TMM between the groups were found. Left and assistant FLM were significantly higher in L3 ( = 0.047 and 0.041, respectively). HGS absolute, relative, and adjusted by FLM were not different between groups. FLM was associated with HGS in all segments ( ≤ 0.001). UBTS absolute values, and as adjusted by TMM, were significantly higher in L3 ( = 0.047 and = 0.049, respectively). Left and non-dominant forearm lean mass were significantly higher in elite climbers. Handgrip strength was not significantly higher in elite climbers; however, the upper-body traction strength was significantly higher in elite climbers, independent of total or regional muscle mass.

摘要

比较不同表现水平的智利登山者的身体成分,并分别确定前臂和上躯干瘦体重与握力和上身牵引力量之间的关系。对30名智利成年男性登山者(26.1±4.9岁)进行了一项横断面研究:9名中级水平(L1)、11名高级水平(L2)和10名精英水平(L3)。通过双能X射线吸收法(DXA;Lunar Prodigy)测量脂肪质量百分比(FM%)、总瘦体重(LM)、前臂瘦体重(FLM)和上躯干瘦体重(UTLM)。还估算了总肌肉质量(TMM)。用Jamar测力计测量握力(HGS)。通过标准化动作评估最大上身牵引力量(UBTS)。根据国际攀岩竞赛规则协会(IRCRA)的规则评估攀登水平。未发现各组之间在FM%、总LM、UTLM或TMM方面存在差异。L3组的左侧和辅助FLM显著更高(分别为P = 0.047和0.041)。各组之间HGS的绝对值、相对值以及经FLM调整后的数值没有差异。在所有节段中,FLM与HGS相关(P≤0.001)。L3组的UBTS绝对值以及经TMM调整后的数值显著更高(分别为P = 0.047和P = 0.049)。精英登山者的左侧和非优势前臂瘦体重显著更高。精英登山者的握力没有显著更高;然而,精英登山者的上身牵引力量显著更高,与总肌肉质量或局部肌肉质量无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79d/11587076/e83a5e95a469/jfmk-09-00228-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79d/11587076/21822c581ac9/jfmk-09-00228-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79d/11587076/e83a5e95a469/jfmk-09-00228-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79d/11587076/21822c581ac9/jfmk-09-00228-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79d/11587076/e83a5e95a469/jfmk-09-00228-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Regional Body Composition and Strength, Not Total Body Composition, Are Determinants of Performance in Climbers.区域身体成分和力量,而非总体身体成分,是登山者运动表现的决定因素。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Nov 12;9(4):228. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040228.
2
Body Composition, Anthropometric Parameters, and Strength-Endurance Characteristics of Sport Climbers: A Systematic Review.运动攀岩者的身体成分、人体测量参数和力量耐力特征:系统评价。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jun 1;37(6):1339-1348. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004464. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Anthropometry of young competitive sport rock climbers.年轻竞技攀岩运动员的人体测量学
Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):420-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.420.
4
The role of physique, strength and endurance in the achievements of elite climbers.体格、力量和耐力在优秀登山者成就中的作用。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182026. eCollection 2017.
5
The physiology of rock climbing.攀岩运动的生理学
Sports Med. 2006;36(6):529-45. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636060-00006.
6
A comparison of body composition assessment methods in climbers: Which is better?登山者身体成分评估方法比较:哪种更好?
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0224291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224291. eCollection 2019.
7
Handgrip strength and muscle quality in Australian women: cross-sectional data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.澳大利亚女性的握力和肌肉质量:来自 Geelong 骨质疏松研究的横断面数据。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Jun;11(3):690-697. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12544. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
8
Mediation effects of lean mass and fat mass on the relationship between body mass index and handgrip strength.瘦体重和脂肪量对体重指数与握力之间关系的中介效应。
Am J Hum Biol. 2024 Apr;36(4):e24004. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.24004. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
9
Associations between absolute and relative handgrip strength with fitness and fatness.绝对和相对握力与体能及肥胖之间的关联。
Sports Med Int Open. 2025 Apr 22;9:a25377537. doi: 10.1055/a-2537-7537. eCollection 2025.
10
Upper and lower limbs composition: a comparison between anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy people.上肢和下肢组成:健康人群人体测量学与双能X线吸收法的比较
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Sep 18;12(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0374-8.