McMullin Mason P, Cadotte Noelle B, Fuchs Erin M, Kartchner Cory A, Vincent Brian, Parker Gretchen, Sweney Jill S, Flaherty Brian F
Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD.
Department of Pediatrics, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Jan 1;26(1):e42-e50. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003640. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
We aimed to implement a post-cardiac arrest targeted temperature management (TTM) bundle to reduce the percent of time with a fever from 7% to 3.5%.
A prospective, quality improvement (QI) initiative utilizing the Method for Improvement. The pre-intervention historical control period was February 2019 to March 2021, and the intervention test period was April 2021 to June 2022.
The PICU of a freestanding, tertiary children's hospital, in the United States.
Pediatric patients 2 days old or older to 18 young or younger than years old who experienced cardiac arrest, received greater than or equal to 2 minutes of chest compressions, required invasive mechanical ventilation post-resuscitation, and had no documented limitations of care.
We developed and implemented a TTM bundle that included standard temperature goals, instructions and training on cooling blanket use, scheduled prescription of antipyretics, an algorithm for managing shivering, and standardized orders in our electronic health record.
We reviewed data from 29 patients in the pre-intervention period and studied 46 in the intervention period. In comparison with historical controls, the reduction in median (interquartile range [IQR]) percentage of febrile (> 38°C) time per patient associated with the TTM bundle was 0% (IQR, 0-3%) vs. 7% (IQR, 0-13%; p < 0.001). The intervention period, vs. pre-intervention, was associated with fewer patients with fever at any time (16/46 vs. 21/29; mean reduction, 37%; 95% CI, 13.8-54.8%; p = 0.002). We failed to identify an association between the intervention period, vs. pre-intervention, and the development of hypothermia (< 35°C; 8/46 vs. 3/29; mean change, 7%; 95% CI, -10.9% to 21.8%; p = 0.40).
In this QI project, we have demonstrated that implementation of a TTM bundle is associated with reduced duration and frequency of fever in patients who survive cardiac arrest.
我们旨在实施一项心脏骤停后目标温度管理(TTM)综合方案,将发热时间百分比从7%降至3.5%。
一项采用改进方法的前瞻性质量改进(QI)举措。干预前的历史对照期为2019年2月至2021年3月,干预试验期为2021年4月至2022年6月。
美国一家独立的三级儿童医院的儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。
年龄在2天及以上至18岁以下经历心脏骤停、接受大于或等于2分钟胸外按压、复苏后需要有创机械通气且无记录在案的护理限制的儿科患者。
我们制定并实施了一项TTM综合方案,其中包括标准温度目标、关于使用降温毯的指导和培训、定期开具退烧药处方、一种处理寒战的算法以及我们电子健康记录中的标准化医嘱。
我们回顾了干预前期29例患者的数据,并在干预期研究了46例患者。与历史对照相比,与TTM综合方案相关的每位患者发热(>38°C)时间中位数(四分位间距[IQR])百分比的降低为0%(IQR,0 - 3%),而历史对照为7%(IQR,0 - 13%;p<0.001)。与干预前相比,干预期在任何时间发热的患者更少(16/46对21/29;平均降低37%;95%CI,13.8 - 54.8%;p = 0.002)。我们未能确定干预期与干预前相比与体温过低(<35°C)的发生之间存在关联(8/46对3/29;平均变化7%;95%CI, - 10.9%至21.8%;p = 0.40)。
在这个质量改进项目中,我们证明了实施TTM综合方案与心脏骤停存活患者发热的持续时间和频率降低相关。