Arjomandi Mehrdad, Zeng Siyang, Barjaktarevic Igor, Bleecker Eugene R, Bowler Russell P, Criner Gerard J, Comellas Alejandro P, Couper David J, Curtis Jeffrey L, Dransfield Mark T, Drummond M Bradley, Fortis Spyridon, Han MeiLan K, Hansel Nadia N, Hoffman Eric A, Kaner Robert J, Kanner Richard E, Krishnan Jerry A, Labaki Wassim, Ortega Victor E, Peters Stephen P, Rennard Stephen I, Cooper Christopher B, Tashkin Donald P, Paine Robert, Woodruff Prescott G
Medical Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, California.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Apr;22(4):494-505. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202405-527OC.
Among tobacco-exposed persons with preserved spirometry (TEPSs), we previously demonstrated that different lung volume indices-specifically, elevated total lung capacity (TLC) versus elevated ratio of functional residual capacity to TLC (FRC/TLC)-identify different lung disease characteristics in the COPDGene cohort. We sought to determine differential disease characteristics and trajectories associated with lung volume indices among TEPSs in the SPIROMICS cohort. We categorized TEPSs ( = 814) by tertiles (low, intermediate, and high) of TLC or residual volume-to-TLC ratio (RV/TLC) derived from baseline computed tomography images and then examined clinical and spirometric disease trajectories in mutually exclusive categories of participants with high TLC without high RV/TLC ([TLC]) versus high RV/TLC without high TLC ([RV/TLC]). We examined differences in computed tomography-measured emphysema (Hounsfield units [HU] ⩽-950; parametric response mapping [PRM] of emphysema), air trapping (HU⩽-856; PRM of functional small airway disease; a disease probability measure for non-emphysematous gas trapping), airway geometry (the mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale; COPD Assessment Test [CAT]; St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]; and Short Form-12 [SF12]), and outcomes (annualized exacerbation rate) between the two categories at baseline and over follow-up time up to 8.5 years, using regression modeling adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, and smoking status (current vs. former smoker) and burden (pack-years). In TEPSs, the pattern of spirometric disease progression differed between participants with [TLC] and those with [RV/TLC]: There was increased forced vital capacity with stable forced expiratory volume in 1 second in participants with [TLC], versus unchanged forced vital capacity but nominally decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second in those with [RV/TLC]. Compared with participants with [TLC], TEPSs with [RV/TLC] had less emphysema (by HU ⩽-950) but more airway disease (by HU ⩽-856; PRM of functional small airway disease; disease probability measure for gas trapping, and mean square root of wall area of a hypothetical airway with 10 mm internal perimeter), more respiratory symptoms (on the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, CAT, SGRQ, and SF12), and more severe exacerbations at baseline. Over an average follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.4 years (range = 0.5-8.5 yr), TEPSs with [RV/TLC] also had a higher likelihood of developing more severe spirometric disease (preserved ratio impaired spirometry or Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Classification 2) and worsening of their respiratory symptoms (on the CAT and SGRQ). Although the incidence rates of respiratory exacerbations, hospitalizations, and mortality were not significantly different between the two categories over the follow-up period, TEPSs with [RV/TLC] were more likely to have been prescribed a respiratory inhaler at their last follow-up visit. In these TEPSs from the SPIROMICS cohort, lung volume stratification by TLC versus RV/TLC identifies two pre-COPD phenotypes with distinct respiratory symptoms, radiographic features, and clinical trajectories. The characteristics of these pre-COPD phenotypes match those previously described in the COPDGene cohort using TLC versus FRC/TLC stratification.
在肺功能正常的烟草暴露者(TEPSs)中,我们之前在慢性阻塞性肺疾病基因(COPDGene)队列研究中证实,不同的肺容积指数——具体而言,是肺总量(TLC)升高与功能残气量与肺总量之比(FRC/TLC)升高——可识别出不同的肺部疾病特征。我们试图确定SPIROMICS队列研究中TEPSs人群中与肺容积指数相关的不同疾病特征及发展轨迹。我们根据基线计算机断层扫描图像得出的TLC或残气量与肺总量之比(RV/TLC)三分位数(低、中、高)对TEPSs(n = 814)进行分类,然后在TLC高但RV/TLC不高([TLC])与RV/TLC高但TLC不高([RV/TLC])这两个相互排斥的参与者类别中,研究临床和肺功能疾病发展轨迹。我们研究了在基线时以及长达8.5年的随访期内,这两个类别在计算机断层扫描测量的肺气肿(Hounsfield单位[HU]≤ -950;肺气肿的参数反应映射[PRM])、气体潴留(HU≤ -856;功能性小气道疾病的PRM;非肺气肿性气体潴留的疾病概率测量)、气道几何结构(内径为10 mm的假设气道壁面积的均方根)、呼吸道症状(改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表;慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试[CAT];圣乔治呼吸问卷[SGRQ];以及简明健康调查量表-12[SF12])和结局(年化加重率)方面的差异,使用了对年龄、性别、身高、体重、吸烟状态(当前吸烟者与既往吸烟者)和吸烟量(包年数)进行调整的回归模型。在TEPSs中,[TLC]组与[RV/TLC]组参与者的肺功能疾病进展模式不同:[TLC]组参与者的用力肺活量增加,1秒用力呼气量稳定,而[RV/TLC]组参与者的用力肺活量不变,但1秒用力呼气量略有下降。与[TLC]组参与者相比,[RV/TLC]组的TEPSs肺气肿较少(根据HU≤ -950判断),但气道疾病较多(根据HU≤ -856;功能性小气道疾病的PRM;气体潴留的疾病概率测量以及内径为10 mm的假设气道壁面积的均方根判断),呼吸道症状更多(根据改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表、CAT、SGRQ和SF12判断),且基线时加重更严重。在平均4.1±2.4年(范围 = 0.5 - 8.5年)的随访期内,[RV/TLC]组的TEPSs发展为更严重肺功能疾病(肺功能保留比值受损或慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议分类2级)以及呼吸道症状恶化(根据CAT和SGRQ判断)的可能性也更高。尽管在随访期内这两个类别之间的呼吸道加重、住院和死亡率发生率无显著差异,但[RV/TLC]组的TEPSs在最后一次随访时更有可能已被处方使用呼吸道吸入器。在SPIROMICS队列研究的这些TEPSs中,通过TLC与RV/TLC进行肺容积分层可识别出两种慢性阻塞性肺疾病前期表型,它们具有不同的呼吸道症状、影像学特征和临床发展轨迹。这些慢性阻塞性肺疾病前期表型的特征与之前在COPDGene队列研究中使用TLC与FRC/TLC分层所描述的特征相符。