From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care (M.K.H., C. Meldrum) and the School of Public Health (W.Y., D.W., E.W.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine (M.A., S.C.L., P.G.W.) and the Cardiovascular Research Institute (S.C.L., P.G.W.), University of California San Francisco, and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System (M.A.) - both in San Francisco; the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (I.Z.B., R.G.B., C.B.C.), and the Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (W.W.S.) - both in Los Angeles; the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (S.-A.B., N.N.H., R.A.W.); the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City (A.P.C.); the Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia (G.J.C.); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (M.T.D.); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT (F.D.); the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Houston Methodist Academic Medicine Associates, Houston (R.J.F.); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (R.K.), and the Breathe Chicago Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy, University of Illinois Chicago (J.A.K.) - both in Chicago; the Department of Genetic Medicine (R.J.K.) and Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine (R.J.K., F.J.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (L.R.) - both in New York; the Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City (R.E.K.); East Carolina University, Greenville (V.M.), and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham (A.M.) - both in North Carolina; HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington (C. McEvoy), and Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis (C.H.W.) - both in Minnesota; and the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine (T.N., F.C.S.) and Epidemiology Data Center (S.R.W.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 29;387(13):1173-1184. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204752. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
Many persons with a history of smoking tobacco have clinically significant respiratory symptoms despite an absence of airflow obstruction as assessed by spirometry. They are often treated with medications for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but supporting evidence for this treatment is lacking.
We randomly assigned persons who had a tobacco-smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, respiratory symptoms as defined by a COPD Assessment Test score of at least 10 (scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms), and preserved lung function on spirometry (ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV] to forced vital capacity [FVC] ≥0.70 and FVC ≥70% of the predicted value after bronchodilator use) to receive either indacaterol (27.5 μg) plus glycopyrrolate (15.6 μg) or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was at least a 4-point decrease (i.e., improvement) in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status) after 12 weeks without treatment failure (defined as an increase in lower respiratory symptoms treated with a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator, glucocorticoid, or antibiotic agent).
A total of 535 participants underwent randomization. In the modified intention-to-treat population (471 participants), 128 of 227 participants (56.4%) in the treatment group and 144 of 244 (59.0%) in the placebo group had at least a 4-point decrease in the SGRQ score (difference, -2.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.6 to 6.3; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.37; P = 0.65). The mean change in the percent of predicted FEV was 2.48 percentage points (95% CI, 1.49 to 3.47) in the treatment group and -0.09 percentage points (95% CI, -1.06 to 0.89) in the placebo group, and the mean change in the inspiratory capacity was 0.12 liters (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.18) in the treatment group and 0.02 liters (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.08) in the placebo group. Four serious adverse events occurred in the treatment group, and 11 occurred in the placebo group; none were deemed potentially related to the treatment or placebo.
Inhaled dual bronchodilator therapy did not decrease respiratory symptoms in symptomatic, tobacco-exposed persons with preserved lung function as assessed by spirometry. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; RETHINC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02867761.).
许多有吸烟史的人尽管肺通气功能检查未显示气流受限,但仍有明显的呼吸道症状。他们常接受治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的药物治疗,但缺乏支持这种治疗的证据。
我们随机分配有至少 10 包年吸烟史、COPD 评估测试评分至少为 10(评分范围为 0 至 40,分数越高表示症状越严重)且肺通气功能检查显示肺功能正常(第一秒用力呼气量[FEV]与用力肺活量[FVC]的比值≥0.70,支气管扩张剂使用后 FVC≥预计值的 70%)的患者,接受茚达特罗(27.5μg)加格隆溴铵(15.6μg)或安慰剂,每天两次,持续 12 周。主要终点是在 12 周无治疗失败(定义为使用长效吸入性支气管扩张剂、糖皮质激素或抗生素治疗后下呼吸道症状加重)的情况下,圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分至少降低 4 分(即改善)(评分范围为 0 至 100,分数越高表示健康状况越差)。
共有 535 名参与者接受了随机分组。在改良意向治疗人群(471 名参与者)中,治疗组 227 名患者中有 128 名(56.4%)和安慰剂组 244 名患者中有 144 名(59.0%)SGRQ 评分至少降低 4 分(差异,-2.6 个百分点;95%置信区间[CI],-11.6 至 6.3;调整后优势比,0.91;95%CI,0.60 至 1.37;P=0.65)。治疗组 FEV%预计值的平均变化为 2.48 个百分点(95%CI,1.49 至 3.47),安慰剂组为-0.09 个百分点(95%CI,-1.06 至 0.89),治疗组吸气量的平均变化为 0.12 升(95%CI,0.07 至 0.18),安慰剂组为 0.02 升(95%CI,-0.03 至 0.08)。治疗组发生 4 例严重不良事件,安慰剂组发生 11 例;没有一例被认为与治疗或安慰剂有关。
吸入双支气管扩张剂治疗不能改善肺通气功能检查显示肺功能正常的有症状、有吸烟史的患者的呼吸道症状。(由美国国立心肺血液研究所和其他机构资助;RETHINC ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT02867761。)