Amiot Aurelien, Seksik Philippe, Meyer Antoine, Stefanescu Carmen, Wils Pauline, Altwegg Romain, Vuitton Lucine, Plastaras Laurianne, Nicolau Adrien, Pereira Bruno, Duveau Nicoals, Laharie David, Mboup Bassirou, Boualit Medina, Allez Matthieu, Rajca Sylvie, Chanteloup Elise, Bouguen Guillaume, Bazin Thomas, Goutorbe Felix, Richard Nicolas, Moussata Driffa, Vicaut Eric, Peyrin-Biroulet Laurent
Gastroenterology, CHU Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France
Gastroenterology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Gut. 2025 Jan 17;74(2):197-205. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333281.
It is unknown which maintenance therapy is the most effective option for patients admitted for an acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) episode responding to intravenous steroids.
We conducted a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised controlled trial among 23 French centres in thiopurine and biologics-naïve adults admitted for ASUC responding to intravenous steroids. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive infliximab (IFX) and azathioprine (AZA) with a 7-day steroid tapering scheme (IFX+AZA arm) or AZA and conventional standardised steroid tapering regimen (AZA arm). The primary composite endpoint was treatment failure at week 52, defined as the absence of steroid-free clinical remission, the absence of endoscopic response, the use of a prohibited treatment for relapse, severe adverse event leading to treatment interruption, colectomy or death. Multiple imputation for missing data was performed.
Among the 64 patients randomised (Lichtiger score 13.5±2.0; median age of 34.5 (P25-P75 26.3-50.3) years, median C reactive protein of 29.0 (12.8-96.8) mg/L at baseline): 32 were assigned to the IFX+AZA arm and 32 to the AZA arm. In the ITT population, treatment failure at week 52 was observed in 22/27 (81.5%) in the AZA arm and 16/30 (53.3%) in the IFX+AZA arm (risk ratio 3.85, 95% CI (1.15 to 12.88), p=0.03). 29 adverse events were severe, including 13 disease exacerbations, 6 severe infections without any difference between both arms.
Combination therapy with IFX+AZA was more effective at 1 year than AZA alone to avoid treatment failure in patients with ASUC responding to intravenous steroids.
NCT02425852.
对于因急性重症溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)发作入院且对静脉注射类固醇有反应的患者,哪种维持治疗是最有效的选择尚不清楚。
我们在法国的23个中心进行了一项多中心、平行组、开放标签的随机对照试验,研究对象为初次使用硫唑嘌呤和生物制剂的成年ASUC患者,这些患者因ASUC发作入院且对静脉注射类固醇有反应。符合条件的患者被随机分配接受英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和硫唑嘌呤(AZA),并采用7天的类固醇减量方案(IFX+AZA组),或接受AZA和传统标准化类固醇减量方案(AZA组)。主要复合终点是第52周时的治疗失败,定义为无类固醇临床缓解、无内镜反应、使用禁止的复发治疗、导致治疗中断的严重不良事件、结肠切除术或死亡。对缺失数据进行了多重填补。
在64例随机分组的患者中(Lichtiger评分13.5±2.0;中位年龄34.5岁(P25-P75 26.3-50.3),基线时C反应蛋白中位数为29.0(12.8-96.8)mg/L):32例被分配到IFX+AZA组,32例被分配到AZA组。在意向性分析人群中,AZA组第52周时22/27(81.5%)出现治疗失败,IFX+AZA组16/30(53.3%)出现治疗失败(风险比3.85,95%CI(1.15至12.88),p=0.03)。29例不良事件为严重不良事件,包括13例疾病加重,6例严重感染,两组之间无差异。
对于因ASUC发作入院且对静脉注射类固醇有反应的患者,1年内IFX+AZA联合治疗比单独使用AZA更有效地避免治疗失败。
NCT02425852。