Liu Haiying, Zhang Yue, Li Xin, Wang Danhua, Huang Dongxue, Zhou Xiaowei, Shen Yuehao
Department of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China. Corresponding author: Shen Yuehao, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Oct;36(10):1095-1011. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240527-00463.
To summarize the best evidence for exercise intervention in elderly patients with sarcopenia in intensive care unit (ICU) through literature search, and provide a reference for clinical implementation of early exercise intervention in this population through evidence-based practice.
(1) Summary of best evidence: relevant literature on exercise intervention for elderly patients with sarcopenia in ICU, including guideline, evidence summary, expert consensus, systematic review, and original study [quasi-experiment and randomized controlled trial (RCT)] from UpToDate Clinical Advisor, Ovid database, National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed/Medline, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, and Yimai Tong Guideline Network were systematically searched. The search period covered from the establishment of these databases up to August 24, 2023. The quality of the literature was evaluated by two researchers with methodological expertise in evidence-based medicine, and the evidences were extracted and summarized. (2) Evidence-based practice: the elderly patients with high risk of sarcopenia who had been hospitalized in the ICU for more than 7 days from January to April 2024 were enrolled as the research subjects, and they were divided into a control group and an intervention group using convenience sampling method. The control group received routine intensive care nursing. The intervention group implemented exercise intervention based on the actual situation of the patients, the baseline review was conducted before evidence application, and the effectiveness of evidence application at 7 days and 14 days was evaluated.
(1) A total of 19 pieces of literature were included, including 4 guidelines, 1 summary of evidence, 4 expert consensuses, 4 systematic reviews, and 6 original studies (1 quasi-experiment, 5 RCT). After literature quality evaluation, all 19 articles were enrolled. Finally, 31 pieces of best evidence were extracted from eight aspects, including assessment and diagnosis, multidisciplinary cooperation, indication, preparation before intervention, intervention program, safety monitoring, post-intervention evaluation, and special task. (2) Finally, a total of 30 patients were enrolled in the intervention group, of which 17 completed 14 days of rehabilitation exercise, and 13 completed 7 days of rehabilitation exercise. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the control group, of which 17 completed 14 days of monitoring, and 10 completed 7 days of monitoring. Clinical evidence application results showed that the patients in the intervention group did not experience adverse events such as increased heart rate, extubation, or physical discomfort. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in both groups was gradually decreased with the prolongation of intervention duration, but the 7-day SMI in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (kg/m: 8.61±2.66 vs. 6.65±1.50, P < 0.01).
By summarizing the best evidence and evidence-based practice of exercise intervention for elderly patients with sarcopenia in ICU, this study confirmed the feasibility due to safe and effective of implementing early exercise intervention for elderly sarcopenia patients in ICU.
通过文献检索总结重症监护病房(ICU)老年肌少症患者运动干预的最佳证据,为该人群早期运动干预的临床实施提供循证参考。
(1)最佳证据总结:系统检索UpToDate临床顾问、Ovid数据库、国家指南库(NGC)、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)、考克兰图书馆、Embase、护理学与健康照护领域累积索引数据库(CINAHL)、PubMed/Medline、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库和医脉通指南网中关于ICU老年肌少症患者运动干预的相关文献,包括指南、证据总结、专家共识、系统评价和原始研究[类实验和随机对照试验(RCT)]。检索时间从各数据库建库至2023年8月24日。由两名具有循证医学方法学专长的研究人员对文献质量进行评价,并提取和总结证据。(2)循证实践:选取2024年1月至4月在ICU住院7天以上的老年肌少症高危患者作为研究对象,采用便利抽样法分为对照组和干预组。对照组接受常规重症监护护理。干预组根据患者实际情况实施运动干预,在证据应用前进行基线评估,并在7天和14天时评价证据应用效果。
(1)共纳入19篇文献,包括4篇指南、1篇证据总结、4篇专家共识、4篇系统评价和6篇原始研究(1篇类实验、5篇RCT)。经文献质量评价,19篇文章全部纳入。最终从评估与诊断、多学科合作、适应证、干预前准备、干预方案、安全监测、干预后评价和特殊事项8个方面提取31条最佳证据。(2)最终干预组共纳入30例患者,其中17例完成14天康复运动,13例完成7天康复运动。对照组纳入27例患者,其中有17例完成14天监测,10例完成7天监测。临床证据应用结果显示,干预组患者未出现心率增加、拔管或身体不适等不良事件。两组骨骼肌质量指数(SMI)均随干预时间延长逐渐下降,但干预组7天时的SMI显著高于对照组(kg/m:8.61±2.66 vs. 6.65±1.50,P<0.01)。
本研究通过总结ICU老年肌少症患者运动干预的最佳证据和循证实践,证实了对ICU老年肌少症患者实施早期运动干预安全有效,具有可行性。