Suppr超能文献

负责海马体单突触和孤立兴奋性突触输入中长时程增强的电导机制。

Conductance mechanism responsible for long-term potentiation in monosynaptic and isolated excitatory synaptic inputs to hippocampus.

作者信息

Barrionuevo G, Kelso S R, Johnston D, Brown T H

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1986 Mar;55(3):540-50. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.55.3.540.

Abstract

The biophysical mechanisms underlying long-term potentiation (LTP) were investigated in identifiable and monosynaptic excitatory inputs to hippocampal neurons. The results provide the first insights into the conductance changes that are responsible for the expression of LTP. Both current- and voltage-clamp measurements of the mossy fiber synaptic response in pyramidal neurons of region CA3 were made with a single-electrode-clamp system. The excitatory postsynaptic response was pharmacologically isolated by bathing hippocampal slices in saline containing 10 microM picrotoxin, which blocks the synaptic inhibition that normally accompanies the experimentally evoked mossy fiber response. LTP was induced by tetanically stimulating the mossy fiber input for 1 s at 100 Hz. Before and 20 min to 1 h after inducing LTP, we attempted to measure the mean excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) amplitude, intrasomatic current-voltage relationship to a step (RN) or alpha function (AN) current waveform, membrane time constant (tau m), spike threshold (T50), peak excitatory postsynaptic current amplitude (IP), synaptic conductance increase (delta G), and synaptic reversal potential (VR); but adequate assessments of all eight of these were not always obtained for every cell that was studied. The induction of LTP increased the mean (+/- SE) EPSP amplitude form 10.5 +/- 1.4 mV during the control period to 16.8 +/- 2.4 mV after the induction of LTP (n = 14; P less than 0.05). This change was not accompanied by increases in the mean value of RN (63 +/- 11 M omega before and 61 +/- 11 M omega after induction; n = 8; P greater than 0.05); AN, which approximates the effective synaptic input resistance at the soma (10.0 +/- 1.50 M omega before and 10.5 +/- 1.60 M omega after; n = 10; P greater than 0.05); or tau m (22 +/- 2 ms before and 20 +/- 2 ms after; n = 8; P greater than 0.05). There was no significant change in T50, which was also assessed with an alpha function current waveform (1.48 +/- 0.11 nA before and 1.49 +/- 0.10 nA after; n = 6; P greater than 0.05). The mean value of IP increased from 1.1 +/- 0.2 nA during the control period to 1.8 +/- 0.3 nA after inducing LTP (n = 15; P less than 0.05). Similarly, delta G increased from 30 +/- 4 nS before to 47 +/- 4 nS after induction (n = 10; P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在对海马神经元可识别的单突触兴奋性输入中,研究了长时程增强(LTP)背后的生物物理机制。这些结果首次揭示了负责LTP表达的电导变化。使用单电极钳系统对CA3区锥体神经元中苔藓纤维突触反应进行了电流钳和电压钳测量。通过将海马切片浸泡在含有10微摩尔苦味毒的盐溶液中,药理学分离出兴奋性突触后反应,苦味毒可阻断通常伴随实验诱发的苔藓纤维反应的突触抑制。通过以100赫兹强直刺激苔藓纤维输入1秒来诱导LTP。在诱导LTP之前以及之后20分钟至1小时,我们试图测量平均兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP)幅度、对阶跃(RN)或α函数(AN)电流波形的胞内电流-电压关系、膜时间常数(tau m)、动作电位阈值(T50)、兴奋性突触后电流峰值幅度(IP)、突触电导增加(delta G)以及突触反转电位(VR);但并非对每个研究的细胞都能对这八项指标进行充分评估。LTP的诱导使平均(±SE)EPSP幅度从对照期的10.5±1.4毫伏增加到LTP诱导后的16.8±2.4毫伏(n = 14;P<0.05)。这种变化并未伴随RN平均值的增加(诱导前为63±11兆欧,诱导后为61±11兆欧;n = 8;P>0.05);AN近似于胞体处的有效突触输入电阻(诱导前为10.0±1.50兆欧,诱导后为10.5±1.60兆欧;n = 10;P>0.05);或tau m(诱导前为22±2毫秒,诱导后为20±2毫秒;n = 8;P>0.05)。T50也使用α函数电流波形进行评估,未发生显著变化(诱导前为1.48±0.11纳安,诱导后为1.49±0.10纳安;n = 6;P>0.05)。IP的平均值从对照期的1.1±0.2纳安增加到诱导LTP后的1.8±0.3纳安(n = 15;P<0.05)。同样,delta G从诱导前的30±4纳秒增加到诱导后的47±4纳秒(n = 10;P<0.05)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验