Dong Sifan, Jiang An, Liu Qifan, An Shiqi
Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Department of hepatobiliary pancreas and liver transplantation, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2024 Dec;42(12):737-746. doi: 10.1089/photob.2024.0080. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
We assessed the efficacy of evaluating palliative resection (R1/R2 resection), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and biliary stenting (stent) alone in the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma using a reticulated meta-analysis. A systematical retrieval in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed for relative literature on the effects of PDT, palliative resection, and simple biliary stenting in the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma. A literature search updated to January 30, 2024, was performed. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and Addis-1.16 0.6 software for reticulated meta-analysis. The results showed that PDT and palliative resection were superior to biliary stenting alone in improving 1-, 2-, and 3-year survivals, and the incidence of cholangitis. The relative effectiveness of PDT, palliative resection, and biliary stent placement alone in improving survival was as follows: PDT, palliative resection, and biliary stent placement alone. There is no significant difference between PDT and palliative resection in improving patient survival time, and PDT does not increase the incidence of cholangitis.
我们采用网状Meta分析评估了单纯姑息性切除(R1/R2切除)、光动力疗法(PDT)和胆道支架置入术(支架)治疗晚期胆管癌的疗效。对PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统检索,以获取关于PDT、姑息性切除和单纯胆道支架置入术治疗晚期胆管癌效果的相关文献。检索了截至2024年1月30日更新的文献。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量,并使用Addis-1.16 0.6软件进行网状Meta分析。结果显示,在提高1年、2年和3年生存率以及胆管炎发生率方面,PDT和姑息性切除优于单纯胆道支架置入术。单纯PDT、姑息性切除和胆道支架置入术在提高生存率方面的相对有效性如下:单纯PDT、姑息性切除和胆道支架置入术。在改善患者生存时间方面,PDT和姑息性切除之间无显著差异,且PDT不会增加胆管炎的发生率。