Illian Hanna, Grimm Clemens, Haller Anna, Liman Jan, Nikos Psychogios Marios, Riedel Christian Heiner, Blaschke Sabine, Göricke Meike Bettina, Roessler Markus, Kunze-Szikszay Nils
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Jun;10(2):452-460. doi: 10.1177/23969873241301884. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
The impact of streamlining algorithms for stroke patients on process times in pre-hospital emergency medicine (PHEM) is not well investigated. We analyzed the changes in pre- and in-hospital process times after implementation of a streamlining algorithm in a physician staffed PHEM system.
We conducted a prospective observational study and analyzed process times of adult stroke patients attended by emergency physicians (EP) of the city of Göttingen PHEM service after implementation of a streamlining algorithm including stroke triage using the FAST-ED score. Stroke patients with standard emergency treatment attended before the implementation served as a control group. All patients were transported directly to the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG) and received endovascular therapy (EVT) and/or systemic thrombolytic therapy.
Of 75 suitable patients eligible in the study group, 37 (49.3%) received EVT and were compared to 44 patients in the control group. Pre-hospital process times did not differ significantly. Median door-to-CT time (12 vs 18 min, = 0.017) and door-to-lysis time (20 vs 24 min, = 0.005) were significantly shorter in the study group. Door-to-groin time was also shortened in the study group (42 vs 49 min) but not significantly ( = 0.088).
Our findings indicate that a PHEM streamlining algorithm (namely the FAST-ED score) can significantly shorten in-hospital process times without delaying pre-hospital care. This improved coordination between PHEM and in-hospital emergency medicine (IHEM) may enhance neurological outcomes for stroke patients. Further research is needed to confirm these results and assess their applicability in other healthcare settings.
简化中风患者救治流程算法对院前急救医学(PHEM)中各项流程时间的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们分析了在由医生配备的PHEM系统中实施简化算法后,院前和院内流程时间的变化。
我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,分析了哥廷根市PHEM服务的急诊医生(EP)在实施包括使用FAST-ED评分进行中风分诊的简化算法后,成年中风患者的流程时间。实施前接受标准急诊治疗的中风患者作为对照组。所有患者均直接转运至哥廷根大学医学中心(UMG),并接受血管内治疗(EVT)和/或全身溶栓治疗。
研究组中75例符合条件的患者中,37例(49.3%)接受了EVT,并与对照组的44例患者进行比较。院前流程时间无显著差异。研究组的中位门到CT时间(12分钟对18分钟,P = 0.017)和门到溶栓时间(20分钟对24分钟,P = 0.005)显著缩短。研究组的门到腹股沟时间也缩短了(42分钟对49分钟),但差异不显著(P = 0.088)。
我们的研究结果表明,PHEM简化算法(即FAST-ED评分)可显著缩短院内流程时间,而不会延迟院前护理。PHEM与院内急诊医学(IHEM)之间这种改善的协调可能会提高中风患者的神经学预后。需要进一步研究来证实这些结果,并评估其在其他医疗环境中的适用性。