Lazarakou Afroditi, Mughini-Gras Lapo, Pijnacker Roan
Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2024 Nov 26. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2024.0047.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, nonpharmaceutical public health interventions (NPIs) were implemented worldwide to control the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, the incidence of other pathogens, including gastrointestinal (GI) pathogens, was also affected. Here, we reviewed studies assessing the impact of NPIs during the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of GI infections, particularly foodborne infections. A systems literature search was conducted in May 2023, using Living Evidence on COVID-19 (COAP) and Scopus. Articles were identified and selected through a screening process with inclusion and exclusion criteria based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Data were extracted from each full-text article included in the review. Parameters included were GI viruses, GI bacteria, NPIs against the COVID-19 pandemic, and the associated impact of NPIs on GI pathogens. A total of 42 articles were included in the review, representing 18 countries. Overall, a larger reduction was observed for viral GI infections compared with bacterial GI infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for norovirus. For bacterial GI infections, and nontyphoidal were the most frequently detected pathogens in the majority of the studies, with the largest reduction observed for and Shiga toxin-producing infections. The sharp decrease in GI viral infections in most of the included countries is suggested to be related to the disruption of person-to-person transmission due to several implemented interventions (e.g., social distancing and hand hygiene). GI bacterial pathogens, more commonly transmitted via the foodborne route, were least impacted, and their reduction is associated with closure of food-providing settings and travel restrictions. However, the observed changes appear to be multifactorial; alterations in health-care-seeking behaviors and in routinary diagnostic testing have undeniably played a significant role, affecting national surveillance systems. Therefore, although NPIs likely had a substantial impact on the burden of GI infectious diseases, the extent of the true change cannot be fully assessed.
在新冠疫情期间,全球实施了非药物公共卫生干预措施(NPIs)以控制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的传播。然而,包括胃肠道(GI)病原体在内的其他病原体的发病率也受到了影响。在此,我们回顾了评估新冠疫情期间NPIs对胃肠道感染,尤其是食源性感染发病率影响的研究。2023年5月,我们使用新冠疫情实时证据(COAP)和Scopus进行了系统的文献检索。通过基于系统评价和Meta分析首选报告项目声明的筛选过程,确定并选择了文章。从纳入综述的每篇全文文章中提取数据。纳入的参数包括胃肠道病毒、胃肠道细菌、针对新冠疫情的NPIs以及NPIs对胃肠道病原体的相关影响。该综述共纳入42篇文章,涉及18个国家。总体而言,在新冠疫情期间,与细菌性胃肠道感染相比,病毒性胃肠道感染的降幅更大,尤其是诺如病毒。对于细菌性胃肠道感染,在大多数研究中,非伤寒沙门氏菌是最常检测到的病原体,其中肠炎沙门氏菌和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌感染的降幅最大。大多数纳入国家的胃肠道病毒感染急剧下降,这被认为与因实施多种干预措施(如社交距离和手部卫生)导致的人际传播中断有关。胃肠道细菌病原体更常见于通过食源性途径传播,受影响最小,其减少与食品供应场所关闭和旅行限制有关。然而,观察到的变化似乎是多因素的;就医行为和常规诊断检测的改变无疑起到了重要作用,影响了国家监测系统。因此,尽管NPIs可能对胃肠道传染病负担产生了重大影响,但真实变化的程度仍无法完全评估。