Suppr超能文献

正畸橡皮筋牵引改善结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术学员的学习曲线:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Orthodontic Rubber Band Traction Improves Trainees' Learning Curve of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study.

作者信息

Zheng Linfu, Chen Longping, Xu Binbin, Luo Baoxiang, Wang Fuqiang, Liu Zhilin, Gao Xingjie, Zhou Linxin, Chen Jiawei, Xie Longke, Hou Yaping, Li Dazhou, Wang Wen

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Fuzhou General Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, 900TH Hospital of Joint Logistics SupportForce, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 26;120(7):1521-1528. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003239.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically demanding operation with a long learning curve. The aim of this study was to determine whether orthodontic rubber band (ORB)-assisted colorectal ESD could improve the trainees' learning curve as it was shown to shorten colorectal ESD procedure time in trainees and experts.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study involved 178 patients who underwent colorectal ESD, randomly divided into trainee ORB-assisted ESD (Trainee ORB-ESD; n = 60), trainee conventional ESD (Trainee C-ESD; n = 57), and expert conventional ESD (Expert C-ESD; n = 61) groups. The main outcome was procedure time.

RESULTS

Per Protocol analysis showed a similar operative time in the trainee ORB-ESD and expert C-ESD groups, which was shorter than in the trainee C-ESD group [28.0 (21.0-35.0) and 25.0 (15.0-35.0) vs 41.0 (31.0-52.5) min; ( P < 0.001)]. The trainee ORB-ESD, trainee C-ESD, and expert C-ESD groups differed significantly in resection speed (11.35, 9.07, and 12.56 mm 2 /min, respectively), good visual field exposure rate (96.7%, 80.7%, and 93.4%), and muscle injury rate (5.0%, 17.5%, and 6.6%). However, the trainee ORB-ESD and expert C-ESD groups were similar in these measures, and all 3 groups were similar in adverse events, en bloc resection, R0 resection, and pathology rates. The cumulative sum suggested that the learning inflection point of the trainee ORB-ESD group was earlier than that of the trainee C-ESD group.

DISCUSSION

ORB-ESD shortened colorectal ESD procedure time and improved efficiency in trainees to an expert level. ORB-ESD could shorten the learning curve, justifying its widespread application.

摘要

引言

结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一项技术要求较高且学习曲线较长的手术。本研究旨在确定正畸橡皮筋(ORB)辅助的结直肠ESD是否能改善受训者的学习曲线,因为已有研究表明其可缩短受训者和专家的结直肠ESD手术时间。

方法

这项前瞻性、随机、对照临床研究纳入了178例行结直肠ESD的患者,随机分为受训者ORB辅助ESD组(受训者ORB - ESD;n = 60)、受训者传统ESD组(受训者C - ESD;n = 57)和专家传统ESD组(专家C - ESD;n = 61)。主要结局指标为手术时间。

结果

符合方案分析显示,受训者ORB - ESD组和专家C - ESD组的手术时间相似,均短于受训者C - ESD组[28.0(21.0 - 35.0)分钟和25.0(15.0 - 35.0)分钟 vs 41.0(31.0 - 52.5)分钟;(P < 0.001)]。受训者ORB - ESD组、受训者C - ESD组和专家C - ESD组在切除速度(分别为11.35、9.07和12.56平方毫米/分钟)、视野暴露良好率(96.7%、80.7%和93.4%)以及肌肉损伤率(5.0%、17.5%和6.6%)方面存在显著差异。然而,受训者ORB - ESD组和专家C - ESD组在这些指标上相似,且三组在不良事件、整块切除、R0切除和病理率方面也相似。累积和分析表明,受训者ORB - ESD组的学习拐点早于受训者C - ESD组。

讨论

ORB - ESD缩短了结直肠ESD手术时间,并将受训者的效率提高到了专家水平。ORB - ESD可缩短学习曲线,证明其具有广泛应用的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda1/12208381/7f2594e9514f/acg-120-1521-g001.jpg

相似文献

4
Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection (TA-ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a randomized multi-center trial.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):5430-5438. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11934-8. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
5
Ex vivo evaluation of a novel through-the-scope traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jun 17;13:a25765837. doi: 10.1055/a-2576-5837. eCollection 2025.
6
The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Mar;55(1):129-142. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00982-9. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
9
The Comparison Between Low- and High-Concentration Injection Solution Ability for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;40(6):1419-1427. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16943. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomogram for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with infective endocarditis.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12043-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):E1082-E1091. doi: 10.1055/a-2181-5929. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Management of complications related to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Clin Endosc. 2023 Jul;56(4):423-432. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.104. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 May-Jun;73(3):233-254. doi: 10.3322/caac.21772. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
10
Efficacy of a Traction Device for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using a Scissor-Type Knife: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 1;117(11):1797-1804. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002019. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验