Nábĕlek A K, Donahue A M, Letowski T R
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986 Jan;23(1):41-52.
"Listening systems" are used for hearing impaired listeners as an alternative to public address systems (PA) used for the general public. These listening systems allow individual control of sound pressure level and minimize the effects of background noise and room reverberation. Three listening systems, based on an audio induction loop (AL), frequency modulation of radio frequencies (FM), and modulation of infrared light (IR) were compared among themselves and with a PA system in a medium-size classroom. Listening groups were normal hearing, hearing impaired, hearing aid users, and elderly. Word identification scores were obtained with the Modified Rhyme Test at two conditions: with a babble of 12 voices at a speech-to-noise ratio (S/N) of + 8 dB, and without the babble at S/N of +20 dB. Analysis of variance indicated that the main effects of systems, groups and room S/N were significant. Also significant were interactions of systems by groups, and systems by S/N. For all groups, the three listening systems provided better scores than the PA system. It can be concluded that all three of the tested listening systems are suitable for listeners with various degrees of hearing losses.
“聆听系统”供听力受损的听众使用,作为面向普通大众的公共广播系统(PA)的替代方案。这些聆听系统允许对声压级进行单独控制,并将背景噪声和房间混响的影响降至最低。在一个中等规模的教室中,对基于音频感应环路(AL)、射频频率调制(FM)和红外光调制(IR)的三种聆听系统进行了相互比较,并与一个公共广播系统进行了比较。聆听组包括听力正常者、听力受损者、助听器使用者和老年人。在两种条件下使用改良韵律测试获得单词识别分数:在语音噪声比(S/N)为+8 dB时伴有12种声音的嘈杂声,以及在S/N为+20 dB时无嘈杂声。方差分析表明,系统、组和房间S/N的主效应显著。系统与组之间以及系统与S/N之间的交互作用也显著。对于所有组来说,这三种聆听系统的得分均高于公共广播系统。可以得出结论,所有三种测试的聆听系统都适用于不同程度听力损失的听众。