Fichten C S, Libman E, Brender W
J Sex Marital Ther. 1986 Spring;12(1):22-34. doi: 10.1080/00926238608415391.
Choice of therapeutic goals and criteria used for evaluation of therapeutic outcome represent fundamental conceptual and methodological issues. The present investigation examined the relationship between how data were obtained (by retrospective questionnaire or ongoing daily self-monitoring), what outcome criteria were used (behavioral or cognitive-affective), whose data were being analyzed (the female or male partner), and when measurements were taken (at posttherapy or follow-up) in a sample of 23 couples with the problem of secondary orgasmic dysfunction in the wife. The results indicate that retrospective measurement was more optimistic than ongoing; cognitive-affective changes were twice as likely to occur as changes in behaviors; females benefited more than males; and there were considerable losses of therapeutic gains at follow-up. These results underscore the need for multiple measurement techniques and highlight the multidimensional quality of the sexual experience.
治疗目标的选择以及用于评估治疗结果的标准代表了基本的概念和方法学问题。本研究调查了在一个由23对存在妻子继发性性高潮功能障碍问题的夫妻组成的样本中,数据获取方式(通过回顾性问卷或持续的每日自我监测)、所使用的结果标准(行为或认知情感)、所分析的数据提供者(女性或男性伴侣)以及测量时间(治疗后或随访时)之间的关系。结果表明,回顾性测量比持续测量更乐观;认知情感变化发生的可能性是行为变化的两倍;女性比男性受益更多;并且在随访时治疗收益有相当大的损失。这些结果强调了采用多种测量技术的必要性,并突出了性体验的多维度性质。