• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速证据综述知识转化以在公共卫生紧急情况下为卫生和社会保健政策和实践提供信息:2021-2023 年威尔士 COVID-19 证据中心流程和影响评估。

Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23.

机构信息

Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Science Evidence Advice Division, Welsh Government, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Nov 26;19(11):e0314461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314461. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314461
PMID:39591409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11594520/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021-23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned.

METHODS

Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders' needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that knowledge mobilisation processes successfully enabled use of the WCEC's rapid evidence reviews to inform policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Realising actual public and patient benefit from this 'pathway to impact' work will take further time and resources.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives, for setting up similar Centres during crisis situations, and supporting future evidence-based policy and practice decision-making.

摘要

背景

威尔士 COVID-19 证据中心(WCEC)成立于 2021-2023 年,旨在确保最新的冠状病毒(COVID-19)相关研究证据随时可供卫生和社会保健政策和实践决策者使用。尽管决策需要基于证据,但确保决策者能够获得可及和相关的研究证据具有挑战性,尤其是在快速演变的大流行环境中,决策的时间框架是数天或数周,而不是数月或数年。我们建立了知识动员流程,以弥合证据审查和为决策提供信息之间的差距,确保正确的信息在正确的时间到达正确的人手中。

目的和目标

描述 WCEC 使用的知识动员流程,评估 WCEC 快速证据审查的影响,并分享经验教训。

方法

我们的知识动员方法灵活且量身定制,以满足利益相关者的需求。它们包括在我们的快速证据审查过程中进行利益相关者共同制定、利益相关者知情和参与式知识动员、更广泛地传播产出和相关活动,包括公众参与、能力建设和方法共享。通过利益相关者参与和利益相关者调查收集了对流程的反馈和影响证据。

结果

调查结果表明,知识动员流程成功地使 WCEC 的快速证据审查能够在威尔士 COVID-19 大流行期间为政策和实践决策者提供信息。要从这项“影响途径”工作中真正实现公众和患者的利益,还需要更多的时间和资源。

讨论和结论

WCEC 的知识动员流程成功地支持了科学顾问以及政策和实践决策者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对快速证据审查结果的共同制定和使用。确定的障碍和促进因素可能与更广泛的证据倡议、在危机情况下建立类似中心以及支持未来基于证据的政策和实践决策相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/d49b830e438d/pone.0314461.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/b2218796adf9/pone.0314461.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/fa768d03f4dc/pone.0314461.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/3e94098acc4f/pone.0314461.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/d12487faddec/pone.0314461.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/d49b830e438d/pone.0314461.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/b2218796adf9/pone.0314461.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/fa768d03f4dc/pone.0314461.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/3e94098acc4f/pone.0314461.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/d12487faddec/pone.0314461.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa38/11594520/d49b830e438d/pone.0314461.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23.快速证据综述知识转化以在公共卫生紧急情况下为卫生和社会保健政策和实践提供信息:2021-2023 年威尔士 COVID-19 证据中心流程和影响评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 26;19(11):e0314461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314461. eCollection 2024.
2
Informing evidence-based policy during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery period: learning from a national evidence centre.在 COVID-19 大流行和恢复期制定循证政策:从国家证据中心学习。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 May 31;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00354-1.
3
A bespoke rapid evidence review process engaging stakeholders for supporting evolving and time-sensitive policy and clinical decision-making: reflection and lessons learned from the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre 2021-2023.一个定制的快速证据审查过程,让利益相关者参与其中,以支持不断演变且具有时间敏感性的政策和临床决策:来自威尔士新冠病毒证据中心2021 - 2023年的反思与经验教训
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 20;23(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01297-w.
4
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
5
COVID-19 research response to immediate demands: setting priorities with key stakeholders to enable health services research in NSW, Australia.COVID-19 研究应对即时需求:与主要利益相关者共同确定优先事项,以在澳大利亚新南威尔士州开展卫生服务研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Sep 17;38(9):344-359. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2023-0059.
6
Building Resilient and Responsive Health Research Systems:Responses and the Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic.构建适应力强且反应迅速的卫生研究系统:应对措施及从新冠疫情中吸取的教训
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 26;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01229-0.
7
The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada.利用证据在 COVID-19 大流行期间指导决策:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的定性案例研究的不同观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jun 3;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01146-2.
8
A health technology assessment of COVID-19 vaccination for Nigerian decision-makers: Identifying stakeholders and pathways to support evidence uptake.尼日利亚决策者的 COVID-19 疫苗接种卫生技术评估:确定利益相关者和支持证据采用的途径。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jun 26;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01158-y.
9
Unlocking data: Decision-maker perspectives on cross-sectoral data sharing and linkage as part of a whole-systems approach to public health policy and practice.解锁数据:决策者对跨部门数据共享与关联的看法,这是公共卫生政策与实践全系统方法的一部分。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Nov 20:1-30. doi: 10.3310/KYTW2173.
10
Using health impact assessment (HIA) to understand the wider health and well-being implications of policy decisions: the COVID-19 'staying at home and social distancing policy' in Wales.利用健康影响评估(HIA)了解政策决策对更广泛的健康和福祉的影响:威尔士的 COVID-19“居家和社会隔离政策”。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 27;21(1):1456. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11480-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A bespoke rapid evidence review process engaging stakeholders for supporting evolving and time-sensitive policy and clinical decision-making: reflection and lessons learned from the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre 2021-2023.一个定制的快速证据审查过程,让利益相关者参与其中,以支持不断演变且具有时间敏感性的政策和临床决策:来自威尔士新冠病毒证据中心2021 - 2023年的反思与经验教训
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 20;23(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01297-w.
2
Informing evidence-based policy during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery period: learning from a national evidence centre.在 COVID-19 大流行和恢复期制定循证政策:从国家证据中心学习。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 May 31;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00354-1.