Suppr超能文献

新型全身性双氯芬酸透皮制剂对腰痛患者上消化道黏膜影响的研究:与口服双氯芬酸的对比研究

Investigation of the effects of a new transdermal formulation of systemic diclofenac on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa in patients with low back pain: A comparative study with oral diclofenac.

作者信息

Fukase Hiroyuki, Futagami Seiji, Yamamoto Takatsugu, Masaoka Tatsuhiro, Terahara Takaaki, Okawa Koji, Tanaka Yusuke, Mita Tsuyoshi

机构信息

ICR Clinical Research Hospital Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec;39(12):2504-2510. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16810. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with gastrointestinal mucosal damage attributed to a topical effect of NSAIDs on the gastrointestinal mucosa after oral administration and cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition. Diclofenac sodium systemic patch (DSSP), a transdermal patch from which diclofenac sodium is absorbed through the skin to exert its effects through the circulating blood, is considered to reduce the occurrence of gastrointestinal mucosal damage compared with oral diclofenac. This study aimed to compare the effect of DSSP on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa with that of an orally administered diclofenac sodium tablet (DST).

METHODS

This randomized, evaluator-blinded study included Japanese patients with low back pain (LBP). The patients were administered with either DSSP (150 mg/day) or DST (75 mg/day) for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and/or erosions on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after the study treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty patients each were randomly assigned to the DSSP and DST groups. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and/or erosions was 26.7% and 86.2% in the DSSP and DST groups, respectively. The difference in the incidence was -59.5% (95% confidence interval: -77.0 to -34.6). No adverse events (AEs) were observed in the DSSP group, and 20.0% (6/30 patients) reported mild AEs in the DST group (excluding ulcers and erosions).

CONCLUSION

DSSP is associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal mucosal damage than DST, which has the same active ingredient but uses a different route of administration, in patients with LBP.

摘要

背景与目的

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与胃肠道黏膜损伤有关,这归因于NSAIDs口服后对胃肠道黏膜的局部作用以及环氧化酶-1的抑制。双氯芬酸钠全身贴剂(DSSP)是一种经皮贴剂,双氯芬酸钠通过皮肤吸收并通过循环血液发挥作用,与口服双氯芬酸相比,被认为可减少胃肠道黏膜损伤的发生。本研究旨在比较DSSP与口服双氯芬酸钠片(DST)对上消化道黏膜的影响。

方法

这项随机、评估者盲法研究纳入了日本的腰痛(LBP)患者。患者分别接受DSSP(150毫克/天)或DST(75毫克/天)治疗2周。主要终点是研究治疗后上消化道内镜检查时胃十二指肠溃疡和/或糜烂的发生率。

结果

DSSP组和DST组各随机分配了30例患者。DSSP组和DST组胃十二指肠溃疡和/或糜烂的发生率分别为26.7%和86.2%。发生率差异为-59.5%(95%置信区间:-77.0至-34.6)。DSSP组未观察到不良事件(AE),DST组有20.0%(6/30例患者)报告了轻度AE(不包括溃疡和糜烂)。

结论

在LBP患者中,与具有相同活性成分但给药途径不同的DST相比,DSSP导致胃肠道黏膜损伤的风险更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986c/11660207/1e0a7fe54f11/JGH-39-2504-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验