Department of Physical therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Woosong University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Department of Digital Bio-Health Convergence, College of Health and Welfare, Woosong University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Oct;40:1769-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.042. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
Active knee extension (AKE) is widely used to assess hamstring length, and an 'AKE >20°' is often used as the criterion for diagnosing tightness. However, the scientific evidence for this is unclear.
This study measured and analysed AKE according to sex in two groups with different exercise participation levels to identify the appropriateness of current criteria.
In the supine position, 90° flexion of the hip and knee joints was performed. The maximal knee extension was measured using a goniometer. Cut-off values for diagnosing hamstring tightness were calculated in three different ways as 'mean-1SD', 'mean-2SD', and 'mean-3SD'.
There were significant differences in AKE between groups and between sexes. In group A, representing normal healthy adults, cut-off values defined as mean-1SD and mean-2SD were 33.5° and 19.7° in male participants and 28.0° and 15.7° in female participants, respectively. There was a weak correlation between AKE and body mass index, but not between AKE and height and between AKE and weight.
This study found that the level of exercise participation significantly affects AKE, and female participants consistently had high flexibility regardless of exercise participation. Therefore, the current cut-off value, widely used in research and clinical settings, may not be a suitable criterion for diagnosing hamstring tightness.
主动膝伸展(AKE)被广泛用于评估腘绳肌长度,通常将“伸膝>20°”作为诊断紧张的标准。然而,目前还不清楚这一标准的科学依据。
本研究通过测量和分析两组不同运动参与水平的 AKE,按性别进行分析,以确定当前标准的适用性。
在仰卧位,髋关节和膝关节弯曲 90°。使用量角器测量最大膝伸展。通过“平均值-1SD”、“平均值-2SD”和“平均值-3SD”三种不同方式计算诊断腘绳肌紧张的截断值。
组间和性别间 AKE 存在显著差异。在代表正常健康成年人的 A 组中,男性参与者的截断值分别为 33.5°和 19.7°,女性参与者为 28.0°和 15.7°。AKE 与体重指数之间存在弱相关,但与身高和体重之间无相关。
本研究发现,运动参与水平显著影响 AKE,且女性参与者无论运动参与程度如何,始终具有较高的柔韧性。因此,目前在研究和临床环境中广泛使用的截断值可能不是诊断腘绳肌紧张的合适标准。