Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Trakya University School of Health Science, Edirne, Turkey
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
Balkan Med J. 2018 Sep 21;35(5):388-393. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.1517. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Hamstrings are one of the most frequently evaluated muscle groups for flexibility in the lower extremity. Passive and active knee extension angle values are used as an indirect indicator of hamstring flexibility. However, the lack of consensus on the cut-off values leads to the use of inconsistent angle values in determining the hamstring tightness.
To establish the normative and cut-off values of the passive and active knee extension angles for healthy young adults and to determine the associated factors including the quadriceps strength.
A cross-sectional study.
A total of 123 volunteer university students, aged 18-24 years, who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Passive and active knee extension assessments of the subjects were performed. Subsequently, on the next day, both knee extensor concentric muscle strength of the participants was measured in the isokinetic system. The knee extension angles and the knee extensor strength were recorded as the mean values of the right and the left sides.
Passive knee extension angles of 17.1°±9.1° and 9.8°±5.7° and active knee extension angles of 17.8°±9.1° and 13.4°±6° were described as normative values in men and women, respectively. The cut-off values for the diagnosis of hamstring shortness were as follows: passive knee extension angle >32.2° for males and >19.2° for females and active knee extension angle >33.0° for males and >23.4° for females. A significant positive correlation was observed between knee extension angles and isokinetic knee extensor muscle strength in all participants. The knee extension angle and hamstring flexibility were not affected by dominance.
The knee extension angles of healthy young people seem to be lower than the results currently reported in the literature. There s a positive correlation between knee extension angles and isokinetic knee extensor muscle strength.
腘绳肌是下肢中最常评估柔韧性的肌肉群之一。被动和主动膝关节伸展角度值被用作腘绳肌柔韧性的间接指标。然而,由于缺乏共识,导致在确定腘绳肌紧张度时使用不一致的角度值。
为健康年轻成年人建立被动和主动膝关节伸展角度的正常值和截断值,并确定相关因素,包括股四头肌力量。
横断面研究。
本研究共纳入 123 名符合纳入标准的志愿者大学生。对受试者进行被动和主动膝关节伸展评估。随后,在第二天,使用等速系统测量参与者的双侧膝关节伸肌向心肌肉力量。记录膝关节伸展角度和膝关节伸肌力量作为右侧和左侧的平均值。
男性和女性的被动膝关节伸展角度分别为 17.1°±9.1°和 9.8°±5.7°,主动膝关节伸展角度分别为 17.8°±9.1°和 13.4°±6°,被描述为正常值。诊断腘绳肌短缩的截断值为:男性的被动膝关节伸展角度>32.2°,女性的被动膝关节伸展角度>19.2°,男性的主动膝关节伸展角度>33.0°,女性的主动膝关节伸展角度>23.4°。所有参与者的膝关节伸展角度与等速膝关节伸肌肌肉力量之间均存在显著正相关。膝关节伸展角度和腘绳肌柔韧性不受优势的影响。
健康年轻人的膝关节伸展角度似乎低于目前文献报道的结果。膝关节伸展角度与等速膝关节伸肌肌肉力量之间存在正相关。