Weiss Margaret Danielle, Richards Eleanor Castine, Bien-Aime Danta, Witkowski Taylor, Williams Peyton, Holmes Katie E, Cortes Dharma E, Tepper Miriam C, Wang Philip S, Aldis Rajendra, Carson Nicholas, Cook Benjamin Le
Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge St., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 10;14(11):1134. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14111134.
The objective of this study was to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a therapeutic assessment protocol for the Screening and Support of Youth (SASY). SASY provides brief but comprehensive community-based screening and support for diverse youth in the community.
SASY screening evaluates symptoms, functioning and clinical risk. The Kiddie Computerized Adaptive Test was used to evaluate seven different diagnoses and symptom severity. The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Self was used to measure functional impairment. Measures were scored according to nationally developed norms. An algorithm was developed to aggregate symptom and function ratings into an overall score for clinical risk. The results are discussed with participants in a motivational interview designed to promote insight, followed by the opportunity for the participant to engage in an online intervention. Protocol changes necessitated by social distancing during the pandemic led to innovative methods including the use of a QR code for recruitment, integration of both online and offline participation, and expansion from in-person recruitment within the schools to virtual engagement with youth throughout the community. The final sample included disproportionately more Black or African American and Hispanic youth as compared to school and community statistics, suggesting that optimization of online and offline methods in research may facilitate the recruitment of diverse populations. Qualitative interviews indicated that the screening and feedback raised youth awareness of their wellbeing and/or distress, its impact on their functioning, and engagement with options for improved wellbeing.
The emergence of innovative methods optimizing the advantages of both online and offline methods, developed as a necessity during the pandemic, proved advantageous to the feasibility and acceptability of community-based recruitment of at-risk, minoritized youth.
本研究的目的是探讨青少年筛查与支持治疗评估方案(SASY)的可接受性和可行性。SASY为社区中的各类青少年提供简短但全面的基于社区的筛查和支持。
SASY筛查评估症状、功能和临床风险。使用儿童计算机自适应测试来评估七种不同的诊断和症状严重程度。使用维斯功能损害评定量表-自评版来测量功能损害。各项测量根据国家制定的标准进行评分。开发了一种算法,将症状和功能评分汇总为临床风险的总体得分。在旨在促进洞察力的动机性访谈中与参与者讨论结果,随后参与者有机会参与在线干预。疫情期间社交距离要求带来的方案变化催生了创新方法,包括使用二维码进行招募、整合线上和线下参与方式,以及从学校内的现场招募扩展到与整个社区的青少年进行虚拟互动。最终样本中黑人或非裔美国人和西班牙裔青少年的比例与学校和社区统计数据相比明显更高,这表明研究中线上和线下方法的优化可能有助于招募不同人群。定性访谈表明,筛查和反馈提高了青少年对自身幸福和/或困扰的认识、其对自身功能的影响,以及参与改善幸福选择的程度。
作为疫情期间的必要举措而开发的创新方法,优化了线上和线下方法的优势,事实证明对以社区为基础招募有风险的少数族裔青少年的可行性和可接受性具有优势。