Suppr超能文献

弹力带训练与多组分训练及团体舞蹈对老年女性形态变量和身体机能的影响:一项随机对照试验

Elastic Band Training Versus Multicomponent Training and Group-Based Dance on Morphological Variables and Physical Performance in Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Hernandez-Martinez Jordan, Guzmán-Muñoz Eduardo, Cid-Calfucura Izham, Villalobos-Fuentes Francisca, Diaz-Saldaña Daissy, Alvarez-Martinez Ignacia, Castillo-Cerda María, Herrera-Valenzuela Tomás, Branco Braulio Henrique Magnani, Valdés-Badilla Pablo

机构信息

Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno 5290000, Chile.

Programa de Investigación en Deporte, Sociedad y Buen Vivir, Universidad de los Lagos, Osorno 5290000, Chile.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2024 Oct 24;14(11):1362. doi: 10.3390/life14111362.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the effects of elastic band training (EBT) versus multicomponent training (MCT) and group-based dance (GBD) on waist circumference, body composition (body fat percentage and fat-free mass), and physical performance (handgrip strength, HGS; 30-s chair stand; timed up-and-go, TUG) in Chilean older women.

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups: EBT ( 10), MCT ( 10), and GBD ( 10). Two 60-min sessions per week for 8 weeks were dedicated to the interventions with pre- and post-assessments. A two-factor mixed ANOVA model with repeated measures was performed to measure the time × group effect.

RESULTS

Multiple comparisons revealed significant differences between EBT and MCT in the body fat percentage ( = 0.001; ES = 2.488, ) in favor of MCT, while HGS in the non-dominant hand ( = 0.044; ES = 0.158) was in favor of EBT. In the intragroup results, only the MCT significantly decreased the body fat percentage ( = 0.044; ES = 0.426, ), and EBT significantly increased HGS in the dominant ( < 0.001; ES = 0.977, ) and non-dominant ( < 0.001; ES = 0.583, ) hands and improved the 30-s chair stand ( = 0.003; ES = 1.612, ) test. The GBD did not report significant changes.

CONCLUSIONS

MCT significantly reduced the body fat percentage regarding EBT, and EBT significantly improved HGS in the non-dominant hand regarding MCT, with no differences reported in the rest of the analyzed variables between the groups.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析弹力带训练(EBT)与多组分训练(MCT)以及集体舞蹈训练(GBD)对智利老年女性腰围、身体成分(体脂百分比和去脂体重)和身体机能(握力,HGS;30秒椅子站立试验;计时起立行走试验,TUG)的影响。

方法

这是一项随机对照试验,设有三个平行组:EBT组(10人)、MCT组(10人)和GBD组(10人)。每周进行两次60分钟的训练,共8周,同时进行干预前后的评估。采用重复测量的双因素混合方差分析模型来测量时间×组间效应。

结果

多重比较显示,EBT组和MCT组在体脂百分比方面存在显著差异(P = 0.001;效应量ES = 2.488),MCT组更具优势,而在非优势手握力方面(P = 0.044;效应量ES = 0.158)EBT组更具优势。在组内结果中,只有MCT组显著降低了体脂百分比(P = 0.044;效应量ES = 0.426),EBT组显著提高了优势手(P < 0.001;效应量ES = 0.977)和非优势手(P < 0.001;效应量ES = 0.583)的握力,并改善了30秒椅子站立试验(P = 0.003;效应量ES = 1.612)。GBD组未报告有显著变化。

结论

与EBT相比,MCT显著降低了体脂百分比;与MCT相比,EBT显著提高了非优势手的握力,两组在其余分析变量上未报告有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f43/11595942/e9e5bf529883/life-14-01362-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验