Suppr超能文献

针灸对头颈部癌患者放射性口干是否有效?一项系统评价和Meta分析。

Is Acupuncture an Effective Treatment for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Gu Wenzhe, Dong Hongjun, Yuan Yuan, Yuan Zijiang, Jiang Xiaoting, Qian Yuhan, Shen Zhengjie

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Zhangjiagang TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Zhangjiagang, China.

Department of Rehabilitation, Zhangjiagang TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Zhangjiagang, China.

出版信息

J Integr Complement Med. 2025 May;31(5):431-444. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0781. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

Abstract

Radiation-induced xerostomia (RIX) stands out as one of the most severe side effects among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Given the varied conclusions in previous studies concerning the association between acupuncture, sham acupuncture, or acupuncture combined with standard oral care and therapeutic effects, our aim is to conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in managing RIX in patients with HNC. Six databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and WanFang Database) were electronically searched, following the Cochrane manual and adhering to reported Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, from their inception dates to July 1, 2024. Primary randomized clinical trials included in systematic reviews or meta-analyses were identified, with the Xerostomia Questionnaire and Xerostomia Inventory designated as the primary outcomes. Salivary flow rates (unstimulated or stimulated) were defined as secondary outcomes. Eight clinical trials involving 1273 participants were analyzed, with six studies included in the meta-analysis. The results indicate that acupuncture demonstrated a significant improvement in patient-reported xerostomia scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [-0.38, -0.02], = 0%) in comparison to standard care, but did not significantly improve oral dryness symptoms compared with sham acupuncture (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.29, 0.16], = 25.8%). The merged total showed negative result (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.27, 0.01], = 8.2%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in stimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI [-0.58, 0.13], = 0%) and unstimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.72], = 67.2%). In general, the acupuncture did not cause serious adverse effects. As far as current research is concerned, acupuncture treatment for RIX symptoms in patients with HNC still lacks strong and convincing evidence support. The more scientific research methods and more clinical trials are still needed.

摘要

放射性口干症(RIX)是头颈癌(HNC)患者中最严重的副作用之一。鉴于以往关于针灸、假针灸或针灸联合标准口腔护理与治疗效果之间关联的研究结论各异,我们的目的是进行一项系统评价,以评估针灸治疗HNC患者RIX的有效性和安全性。按照Cochrane手册并遵循报告的系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,对六个数据库(Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、中国知网、重庆维普和万方数据库)进行了电子检索,检索时间从各数据库建库日期至2024年7月1日。确定了系统评价或Meta分析中纳入的主要随机临床试验,将口干症问卷和口干症量表指定为主要结局。唾液流速(非刺激或刺激状态下)定义为次要结局。分析了八项涉及1273名参与者的临床试验,其中六项研究纳入了Meta分析。结果表明,与标准护理相比,针灸在患者报告的口干症评分方面有显著改善(标准化均数差[SMD]= -0.20,95%置信区间[95%CI][-0.38, -0.02],P = 0%),但与假针灸相比,在改善口腔干燥症状方面无显著差异(SMD = -0.06,95%CI[-0.29, 0.16],P = 25.8%)。合并后的总体结果为阴性(SMD = -0.13,95%CI[-0.27, 0.01],P = 8.2%)。此外,刺激唾液流速(SMD = -0.22,95%CI[-0.58, 0.13],P = 0%)和非刺激唾液流速(SMD = -0.19,95%CI[-0.11, 0.72],P = 67.2%)均无显著差异。总体而言,针灸未引起严重不良反应。就目前的研究而言,针灸治疗HNC患者的RIX症状仍缺乏有力且令人信服的证据支持。仍需要更科学的研究方法和更多的临床试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验