• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线双参数前列腺MRI活检阴性患者发生具有临床意义的前列腺癌的长期风险

Long-Term Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Negative Patients With Baseline Biparametric Prostate MRI.

作者信息

Parhiala Laura, Knaapila Juha, Jambor Ivan, Verho Janne, Syvänen Kari, Aronen Hannu, Boström Peter, Ettala Otto

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jun;61(6):2425-2432. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29668. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.29668
PMID:39601084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12063762/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The long-term prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with initial negative prostate biopsy is unknown.

PURPOSE

To investigate the rate of csPCa of men with initial negative biopsy.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

POPULATION

A total of 197 men (mean age 63 years [SD ±6.98, range 29-79]) without csPCa on initial biopsy and available baseline biparametric prostate MRI (bpMRI).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T, turbo spin-echo T2-weighted (axial and sagittal) and three sets of diffusion-weighted imaging using single-shot spin-echo planar imaging (5 b-values 0-500 seconds/mm; 2 b-values 0 and 1500 seconds/mm, and 2 b-values 0 and 2000 seconds/mm).

ASSESSMENT

BpMRI was read using Prostate Imaging Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1. Systematic or targeted biopsy results served as reference standard.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Continuous variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. Categorical variables were compared using either Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-square test. Uni- and multivariate regression odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were used to study factors affecting csPCa being diagnosed during follow-up. Time to diagnosis of csPCa is calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 197 men, 74 (38%), 57 (29%), and 66 (34%) presented with PI-RADS 1-2, 3, and 4-5 findings in the baseline bpMRI. During the median follow-up of 52 months, 8.1%, 5.3%, and 18.2% of these men were diagnosed with csPCa, respectively. Baseline PI-RADS finding was the only factor that associated with csPCa found during the follow-up.

DATA CONCLUSION

Baseline bpMRI with PI-RADS scores 1-3 and initial biopsies negative of csPCa had low rate of csPCa during follow-up, which supports more conservative follow-up for them but further research with longer follow-up is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

摘要

背景

初次前列腺活检结果为阴性的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)的长期患病率尚不清楚。

目的

调查初次活检结果为阴性的男性中csPCa的发生率。

研究类型

对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。

研究对象

共有197名男性(平均年龄63岁[标准差±6.98,范围29 - 79岁]),初次活检时无csPCa且有可用的基线双参数前列腺MRI(bpMRI)。

场强/序列:3.0T,涡轮自旋回波T2加权成像(轴位和矢状位)以及三组扩散加权成像,采用单次激发自旋回波平面成像(5个b值0 - 500秒/毫米;2个b值0和1500秒/毫米,以及2个b值0和2000秒/毫米)。

评估

使用前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2.1对bpMRI进行解读。系统活检或靶向活检结果作为参考标准。

统计检验

连续变量采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验进行比较。分类变量采用Fisher精确检验或Pearson卡方检验进行比较。单因素和多因素回归比值比(95%置信区间)用于研究影响随访期间csPCa诊断率的因素。csPCa的诊断时间采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算。

结果

在197名男性中,74名(38%)、57名(29%)和66名(34%)在基线bpMRI中表现为PI-RADS 1 - 2、3和4 - 5结果。在中位随访52个月期间,这些男性中分别有8.1%、5.3%和18.2%被诊断为csPCa。基线PI-RADS结果是随访期间与发现csPCa相关的唯一因素。

数据结论

基线bpMRI的PI-RADS评分为1 - 3且初次活检csPCa为阴性的患者在随访期间csPCa发生率较低,这支持对他们采取更保守的随访方式,但仍需要进行更长时间随访的进一步研究。

证据水平

3 技术效能:2级

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0f/12063762/2e08fa47be4b/JMRI-61-2425-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0f/12063762/c88d40226a98/JMRI-61-2425-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0f/12063762/2e08fa47be4b/JMRI-61-2425-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0f/12063762/c88d40226a98/JMRI-61-2425-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0f/12063762/2e08fa47be4b/JMRI-61-2425-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Negative Patients With Baseline Biparametric Prostate MRI.基线双参数前列腺MRI活检阴性患者发生具有临床意义的前列腺癌的长期风险
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jun;61(6):2425-2432. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29668. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.基于 PI-RADS v2.1 分类的 MRI-超声融合靶向活检在前列腺移行/周围区的有效性和准确性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Sep;58(3):709-717. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28614. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
3
Opportunistic Prostate Cancer Screening with Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (VISIONING).双参数磁共振成像(VISIONING)用于机会性前列腺癌筛查
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Mar;10(2):332-338. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.前列腺机器人辅助经会阴融合前列腺活检前前列腺双参数与多参数 MRI 的头对头比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2431-2438. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04120-1. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Nomogram to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Targeted Biopsy for Index Lesion.基于双参数磁共振成像的列线图,通过对索引病灶进行靶向活检来检测具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Apr;55(4):1226-1233. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27841. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
6
Prospective evaluation of PI-RADSv2.1 using multiparametric and biparametric MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.基于MRI/超声融合引导活检,使用多参数和双参数MRI对PI-RADSv2.1进行前瞻性评估,以检测临床显著前列腺癌。
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Mar;43(3):472-482. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01675-4. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
7
Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Patients With Lesions of PI-RADS v2.1 Score ≥3.用于诊断 PI-RADS v2.1 评分≥3 病变患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌的可解释机器学习模型的开发和验证
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Nov;60(5):2130-2141. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29275. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
8
Comparison of a Deep Learning-Accelerated vs. Conventional T2-Weighted Sequence in Biparametric MRI of the Prostate.深度学习加速与传统 T2 加权序列在前列腺双参数 MRI 中的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Oct;58(4):1055-1064. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28602. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.活检前MRI检查结果为阴性后临床显著前列腺癌的检测:双参数MRI与多参数MRI的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 May;218(5):859-866. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26569. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
10
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term follow-up results of multiparametric prostate MRI and the prognostic value of PI-RADS: a single-center retrospective cohort study.多参数前列腺 MRI 的长期随访结果及 PI-RADS 的预后价值:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 May 13;30(3):139-151. doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.232414. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
A prospective study of cancer detection rates following early repeat imaging and biopsy of PI-RADS 4 and 5 regions of interest exhibiting no clinically significant prostate cancer on prior biopsy.一项前瞻性研究,针对先前活检未发现临床显著前列腺癌的PI-RADS 4和5类感兴趣区域进行早期重复成像和活检后的癌症检测率。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Dec;16(12):418-422. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7843.
3
Incidence of significant prostate cancer after negative MRI and systematic biopsy in the FUTURE trial.
FUTURE试验中MRI阴性及系统活检后显著前列腺癌的发生率。
BJU Int. 2023 Mar;131(3):313-320. doi: 10.1111/bju.15876. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
4
Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.前列腺多参数 MRI 中 PI-RADS 类别 3 患者随访的适宜随访间隔的单中心分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 25;12(1):6746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10859-9.
5
Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0).基于个体的非对比 MRI 风险评估和疑似前列腺癌男性的共享决策:多中心随机对照试验协议 (multi-IMPROD V.2.0)。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e053118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053118.
6
How to read biparametric MRI in men with a clinical suspicious of prostate cancer: Pictorial review for beginners with public access to imaging, clinical and histopathological database.临床怀疑患有前列腺癌的男性如何解读双参数MRI:面向可公开获取影像、临床及组织病理学数据库的初学者的图谱综述
Acta Radiol Open. 2021 Nov 30;10(11):20584601211060707. doi: 10.1177/20584601211060707. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Outcome of 5-year follow-up in men with negative findings on initial biparametric MRI.初始双参数磁共振成像结果为阴性的男性患者的5年随访结果
Heliyon. 2021 Nov 6;7(11):e08325. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08325. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Biparametric Prostate MRI, Radiomics, and Kallikreins: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.使用双参数前列腺MRI、影像组学和激肽释放酶检测前列腺癌:对临床怀疑前列腺癌男性的回顾性多中心研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Feb;55(2):465-477. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27811. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk.系统评价和荟萃分析双参数前列腺 MRI 对有前列腺癌风险男性的诊断准确性。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep;24(3):596-611. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00298-w. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
10
Risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density for enhanced biopsy avoidance in first prostate cancer diagnostic evaluation.在首次前列腺癌诊断评估中,基于前列腺磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原密度进行风险适应性活检决策,以增强活检避免率。
BJU Int. 2021 Feb;127(2):175-178. doi: 10.1111/bju.15277. Epub 2020 Nov 13.