• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策支持系统在非传染性慢性病管理中的益处:针对性文献综述

Benefits of Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Management of Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: Targeted Literature Review.

作者信息

Grechuta Klaudia, Shokouh Pedram, Alhussein Ahmad, Müller-Wieland Dirk, Meyerhoff Juliane, Gilbert Jeremy, Purushotham Sneha, Rolland Catherine

机构信息

Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.

Adivus Medical Consultancy Mpv., Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2024 Nov 27;13:e58036. doi: 10.2196/58036.

DOI:10.2196/58036
PMID:39602213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11635333/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are designed to assist in health care delivery by supporting medical practice with clinical knowledge, patient information, and other relevant types of health information. CDSSs are integral parts of health care technologies assisting in disease management, including diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. While electronic medical records (EMRs) serve as data repositories, CDSSs are used to assist clinicians in providing personalized, context-specific recommendations derived by comparing individual patient data to evidence-based guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify characteristics and features of both stand-alone and EMR-integrated CDSSs that influence their outcomes and benefits based on published scientific literature.

METHODS

A TLR was conducted using the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases to identify data on CDSSs published in a 10-year frame (2012-2022). Studies on computerized, guideline-based CDSSs used by health care practitioners with a focus on chronic disease areas and reporting outcomes for CDSS utilization were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 49 publications were included in the TLR. Studies predominantly reported on EMR-integrated CDSSs (ie, connected to an EMR database; n=32, 65%). The implementation of CDSSs varied globally, with substantial utilization in the United States and within the domain of cardio-renal-metabolic diseases. CDSSs were found to positively impact "quality assurance" (n=35, 69%) and provide "clinical benefits" (n=20, 41%), compared to usual care. Among CDSS features, treatment guidance and flagging were consistently reported as the most frequent elements for enhancing health care, followed by risk level estimation, diagnosis, education, and data export. The effectiveness of a CDSS was evaluated most frequently in primary care settings (n=34, 69%) across cardio-renal-metabolic disease areas (n=32, 65%), especially in diabetes (n=13, 26%). Studies reported CDSSs to be commonly used by a mixed group (n=27, 55%) of users including physicians, specialists, nurses or nurse practitioners, and allied health care professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, both EMR-integrated and stand-alone CDSSs showed positive results, suggesting their benefits to health care providers and potential for successful adoption. Flagging and treatment recommendation features were commonly used in CDSSs to improve patient care; other features such as risk level estimation, diagnosis, education, and data export were tailored to specific requirements and collectively contributed to the effectiveness of health care delivery. While this TLR demonstrated that both stand-alone and EMR-integrated CDSSs were successful in achieving clinical outcomes, the heterogeneity of included studies reflects the evolving nature of this research area, underscoring the need for further longitudinal studies to elucidate aspects that may impact their adoption in real-world scenarios.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c3/11635333/61999543dfa1/ijmr_v13i1e58036_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c3/11635333/3aedba5cc528/ijmr_v13i1e58036_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c3/11635333/61999543dfa1/ijmr_v13i1e58036_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c3/11635333/3aedba5cc528/ijmr_v13i1e58036_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c3/11635333/61999543dfa1/ijmr_v13i1e58036_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

临床决策支持系统(CDSS)旨在通过利用临床知识、患者信息及其他相关健康信息类型来支持医疗实践,从而辅助医疗服务的提供。CDSS是协助疾病管理(包括诊断、治疗和监测)的医疗技术的重要组成部分。电子病历(EMR)作为数据存储库,而CDSS则用于通过将个体患者数据与循证指南进行比较,协助临床医生提供个性化的、针对具体情况的建议。

目的

本定向文献综述(TLR)旨在根据已发表的科学文献,确定独立型和与EMR集成型CDSS的特征及功能,这些特征和功能会影响其结果和效益。

方法

使用Embase、MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库进行TLR,以识别在10年时间框架(2012 - 2022年)内发表的关于CDSS的数据。纳入的研究需是医疗从业者使用的基于计算机化、指南的CDSS,重点关注慢性病领域并报告CDSS使用的结果。

结果

TLR共纳入49篇出版物。研究主要报道了与EMR集成的CDSS(即连接到EMR数据库;n = 32,65%)。CDSS的实施在全球范围内各不相同,在美国以及心脏 - 肾脏 - 代谢疾病领域有大量应用。与常规护理相比,发现CDSS对“质量保证”有积极影响(n = 35,69%)并提供“临床效益”(n = 20,41%)。在CDSS功能中,治疗指导和标记一直被报告为增强医疗保健的最常见要素,其次是风险水平估计、诊断、教育和数据导出。CDSS的有效性在心脏 - 肾脏 - 代谢疾病领域(n = 32,65%)的初级保健环境中评估最为频繁(n = 34,69%),尤其是在糖尿病方面(n = 13,26%)。研究报告称,包括医生、专科医生、护士或执业护士以及专职医疗保健专业人员在内的混合用户群体(n = 27,55%)普遍使用CDSS。

结论

总体而言,与EMR集成的CDSS和独立型CDSS均显示出积极结果,表明它们对医疗保健提供者有益且具有成功采用的潜力。标记和治疗推荐功能在CDSS中普遍用于改善患者护理;其他功能,如风险水平估计、诊断、教育和数据导出则根据特定要求进行定制,并共同促进了医疗服务的有效性。虽然本TLR表明独立型和与EMR集成型CDSS在实现临床结果方面均取得成功,但纳入研究的异质性反映了该研究领域的不断发展性质,强调需要进一步进行纵向研究,以阐明可能影响其在实际场景中采用的因素。

相似文献

1
Benefits of Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Management of Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: Targeted Literature Review.临床决策支持系统在非传染性慢性病管理中的益处:针对性文献综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Nov 27;13:e58036. doi: 10.2196/58036.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The Effect of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Clinical Decision Support System on Adherence to Clinical Protocols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care: Interrupted Time Series Study.基于电子病历的临床决策支持系统对炎症性肠病护理中临床方案依从性的影响:中断时间序列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 22;12:e55314. doi: 10.2196/55314.
4
The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.药学计算机化临床决策支持对处方、临床及患者结局的影响:文献系统评价
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Apr;18(2):69-87.
5
The effects of computerised decision support systems on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review and user contextualisation.计算机化决策支持系统对护理及相关健康专业人员绩效和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述与用户情境化分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(40):1-93. doi: 10.3310/GRNM5147.
6
The Integration of Clinical Decision Support Systems Into Telemedicine for Patients With Multimorbidity in Primary Care Settings: Scoping Review.将临床决策支持系统整合到初级保健环境中患有多种疾病的远程医疗患者中:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 28;25:e45944. doi: 10.2196/45944.
7
Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings.移动设备决策支持工具改善基层医疗服务质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 27;7(7):CD012944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012944.pub2.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007).用于处方开具的计算机化临床决策支持系统能否改变医疗行为?对文献(1990 - 2007年)的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug 28;9:154. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-154.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating PRISM with User-centered Design (PRISM+UCD): Designing clinical decision support for safe opioid prescribing.将PRISM与以用户为中心的设计相结合(PRISM+UCD):设计用于安全阿片类药物处方的临床决策支持。
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-7236339. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7236339/v1.
2
Factors Influencing the Implementation and Adoption of Digital Nursing Technologies: Systematic Umbrella Review.影响数字护理技术实施与应用的因素:系统综合评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 31;27:e64616. doi: 10.2196/64616.
3
Leveraging Dual Usability Methods to Evaluate Clinical Decision Support Among Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities.利用临床决策支持系统的力量:挑战与机遇。
Open Heart. 2023 Nov 28;10(2):e002432. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.临床决策支持系统在初级保健中的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):57-69. doi: 10.1370/afm.2908.
3
A systematic review on the effectiveness and impact of clinical decision support systems for breathlessness.
利用双重可用性方法评估创伤性脑损伤患者的临床决策支持:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 30;12:e60268. doi: 10.2196/60268.
4
Analytical validation of Exandra: a clinical decision support system for promoting guideline-directed therapy of type-2 diabetes in primary care - a collaborative study with experts from Diabetes Canada.Exandra的分析验证:一种用于促进初级保健中2型糖尿病指南指导治疗的临床决策支持系统——与加拿大糖尿病协会专家的合作研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02881-4.
系统评价呼吸困难临床决策支持系统的有效性和影响。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Aug 20;32(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00291-x.
4
Development of an Interoperable and Easily Transferable Clinical Decision Support System Deployment Platform: System Design and Development Study.开发一个可互操作且易于迁移的临床决策支持系统部署平台:系统设计与开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 27;24(7):e37928. doi: 10.2196/37928.
5
Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.临床决策支持对双相情感障碍、分裂情感性障碍或精神分裂症成人心血管风险的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220202. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0202.
6
Effect of computerised, knowledge-based, clinical decision support systems on patient-reported and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic disease managed in primary care settings: a systematic review.计算机化、基于知识的临床决策支持系统对初级保健环境中慢性病管理患者的患者报告结局和临床结局的影响:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 22;11(12):e054659. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054659.
7
Clinical Decision Support and New Regulatory Frameworks for Medical Devices: Are We Ready for It? - A Viewpoint Paper.临床决策支持与医疗器械新监管框架:我们准备好了吗?——一篇观点文章。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):3159-3163. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.144. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
8
Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered, Web-Based Clinical Decision Support System for the Treatment of Depression in Adults: Longitudinal Feasibility Study.评估基于网络的人工智能临床决策支持系统用于成人抑郁症治疗的临床可行性:纵向可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 25;5(10):e31862. doi: 10.2196/31862.
9
The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床用药决策支持系统对患者结局和医生实践表现的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01376-8.
10
Factors That Impact the Adoption of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for Antibiotic Management.影响临床决策支持系统(CDSS)在抗生素管理中应用的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 16;18(4):1901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041901.