Yang Chongshuang, Hassan Hasyma Abu, Omar Nur Farhayu, Soo Tze Hui, Yahaya Ahmad Shuib Bin, Shi Tianliang, Qin Zhihong, Wu Min, Yang Jing
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; Department of Radiology, Tongren People's Hospital, Tongren, Guizhou Province 554300, China.
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Feb;116:110282. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.110282. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
To explore the value of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing parametrial invasion (PMI) and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) of cervical cancer.
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of cervical cancer patients diagnosed pathologically at our hospital from January 2021 to June 2024. All patients underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and APT imaging before treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and APT values were measured. Based on the pathological results, patients were categorized into LVSI (+) and LVSI (-) groups, and PMI (+) and PMI (-) groups. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the ADC and APT values between these groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI and LVSI. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance among these measures.
A total of 83 patients were included, with 56 in the LVSI (-) group, 27 in the LVSI (+) group, 35 in the PMI (-) group, and 16 in the PMI (+) group. The ADC values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly lower than those for the LVSI (-) and PMI (-) groups (P < 0.01). The APT values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly higher than those for the LVSI (-) and PMI (-) groups (P < 0.01). The AUC values for ADC, APT, and the combination of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI were 0.839, 0.788, and 0.880, respectively, and in predicting PMI were 0.770, 0.764, and 0.796, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the diagnostic performance of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI. However, the diagnostic performance of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI was significantly better than that of ADC and APT alone (P < 0.01).
APT imaging can predict LVSI and PMI status in cervical cancer before surgery. When combined with ADC, its diagnostic accuracy for predicting LVSI is higher than that of APT or ADC alone. This suggests a novel approach for assessing LVSI in cervical cancer.
探讨酰胺质子转移(APT)成像在评估宫颈癌宫旁组织浸润(PMI)和淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)中的价值。
回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年6月在我院经病理诊断的宫颈癌患者的临床及影像资料。所有患者在治疗前均接受常规磁共振成像(MRI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)和APT成像。测量表观扩散系数(ADC)和APT值。根据病理结果,将患者分为LVSI(+)组和LVSI(-)组,以及PMI(+)组和PMI(-)组。采用独立样本t检验比较各组间的ADC和APT值。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估ADC、APT及ADC+APT在预测PMI和LVSI中的敏感性、特异性及曲线下面积(AUC)。采用德龙检验比较这些指标的诊断性能。
共纳入83例患者,其中LVSI(-)组56例,LVSI(+)组27例,PMI(-)组35例,PMI(+)组16例。LVSI(+)组和PMI(+)组的ADC值显著低于LVSI(-)组和PMI(-)组(P<0.01)。LVSI(+)组和PMI(+)组的APT值显著高于LVSI(-)组和PMI(-)组(P<0.01)。ADC、APT及ADC+APT联合预测LVSI的AUC值分别为0.839、0.788和0.880,预测PMI的AUC值分别为0.770、0.764和0.796。ADC、APT及ADC+APT在预测PMI方面的诊断性能无统计学差异。然而,ADC+APT在预测LVSI方面的诊断性能显著优于单独的ADC和APT(P<0.01)。
APT成像可在术前预测宫颈癌的LVSI和PMI状态。与ADC联合使用时,其预测LVSI的诊断准确性高于单独的APT或ADC。这为评估宫颈癌的LVSI提供了一种新方法。