• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者特征和实践差异与重症后新的苯二氮䓬类和 Z 类催眠药物的社区处方有关:使用英国临床实践研究数据链接的回顾性队列研究。

Patient Characteristics and Practice Variation Associated With New Community Prescription of Benzodiazepine and z-Drug Hypnotics After Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

机构信息

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70056. doi: 10.1002/pds.70056.

DOI:10.1002/pds.70056
PMID:39603606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11602247/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Survivors of critical illness are often affected by new or worsened mental health conditions and sleep disorders. We examined the incidence, practice variation and factors associated with new benzodiazepine and z-drug community prescriptions among critical illness survivors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink data included 52 846 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018 who were not prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs before hospitalisation. We performed multilevel multivariable logistic regression to assess patient factors associated with new (any prescription within 90 days) and with new-and-persistent (2+ prescriptions within 180 days) benzodiazepine or z-drug prescribing, and to evaluate variation by primary care practice.

RESULTS

5.2% (2769/52846) of treatment-naïve survivors (95% CI 5.1-5.4) were prescribed a benzodiazepine or z-drug, and 2.5% (1311/52846) had new-and-persistent prescribing. A history of insomnia (adjusted OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.74-2.21), anxiety or depression (adjusted OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.28-1.53) and recent prescription opioid use (adjusted OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.34-1.61) were associated with new community prescription. Sex was not associated with new prescriptions and older patients were less likely to receive a prescription. 2.6% of the variation in new prescribing and 4.1% of the variation in new-and-persistent prescribing were attributable to the prescribing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

One in twenty critical illness survivors receive a new community benzodiazepine or z-drug prescription. Further research is needed to understand where in the patient care pathway initiation occurs and the risk of adverse events in survivors of recent critical illness.

摘要

目的

危重病幸存者常受到新的或恶化的心理健康状况和睡眠障碍的影响。我们研究了危重病幸存者中新的苯二氮䓬类和 Z 类药物社区处方的发生率、实践差异和相关因素。

方法

一项回顾性队列研究使用英国临床实践研究数据链接数据,纳入了 2010 年和 2018 年住院的 52846 名成年重症监护幸存者,这些患者在住院前未开处苯二氮䓬类或 Z 类药物。我们进行了多水平多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估与新处方(90 天内任何处方)和新持续处方(180 天内 2 次或以上处方)相关的患者因素,并评估初级保健实践的差异。

结果

5.2%(2769/52846)的治疗初治幸存者(95%CI5.1-5.4)开了苯二氮䓬类或 Z 类药物,2.5%(1311/52846)有新持续处方。失眠史(调整后的比值比 1.96;95%CI1.74-2.21)、焦虑或抑郁史(调整后的比值比 1.40;95%CI1.28-1.53)和近期处方类阿片类药物使用(调整后的比值比 1.47;95%CI1.34-1.61)与新的社区处方相关。性别与新处方无关,年龄较大的患者不太可能开处方。新处方的 2.6%和新持续处方的 4.1%的差异归因于处方实践。

结论

五分之一的危重病幸存者接受了新的社区苯二氮䓬类或 Z 类药物处方。需要进一步研究以了解在患者治疗路径中的何处开始以及最近危重病幸存者的不良事件风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d4f/11602247/1ffd88643bbf/PDS-33-e70056-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d4f/11602247/89ddb555220b/PDS-33-e70056-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d4f/11602247/1ffd88643bbf/PDS-33-e70056-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d4f/11602247/89ddb555220b/PDS-33-e70056-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d4f/11602247/1ffd88643bbf/PDS-33-e70056-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Characteristics and Practice Variation Associated With New Community Prescription of Benzodiazepine and z-Drug Hypnotics After Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.患者特征和实践差异与重症后新的苯二氮䓬类和 Z 类催眠药物的社区处方有关:使用英国临床实践研究数据链接的回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70056. doi: 10.1002/pds.70056.
2
Benzodiazepine and z-drug prescribing in critical care survivors and the risk of rehospitalisation or death due to falls/trauma and due to any cause: a retrospective matched cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.危重症幸存者中苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物的处方情况以及因跌倒/创伤和任何原因再次住院或死亡的风险:一项使用英国临床实践研究数据链的回顾性配对队列研究
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):125-136. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07762-4. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Benzodiazepine and z-hypnotic prescribing for older people in primary care: a cross-sectional population-based study.基层医疗中老年人苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类催眠药的处方情况:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;66(647):e410-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685213. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
4
Starting insomnia treatment: the use of benzodiazepines versus z-hypnotics. A prescription database study of predictors.开始失眠治疗:苯二氮䓬类药物与Z类催眠药的使用。一项关于预测因素的处方数据库研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;65(3):295-301. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0565-8. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
5
Prescription Patterns and Predisposing Factors of Benzodiazepine and Z-Hypnotic Use During Pregnancy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.孕期苯二氮䓬类和 Z-催眠药使用的处方模式和促成因素:一项全国性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jun;33(6):e5847. doi: 10.1002/pds.5847.
6
Antipsychotic, benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescriptions in a Swiss hospital network in the Choosing Wisely and COVID-19 eras: a longitudinal study.抗精神病药、苯二氮䓬类药物和 Z 类药物在选择明智和 COVID-19 时代的瑞士医院网络中的处方:一项纵向研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024 Nov 1;154:3409. doi: 10.57187/s.3409.
7
Evaluation of the prescribing practices of nonbenzodiazepine, benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics in adults at a federally qualified health center.评估一家联邦合格健康中心成年人中使用非苯二氮䓬类、苯二氮䓬受体激动剂类催眠药物的处方实践。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Jul-Aug;59(4S):S146-S150. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
Long-term benzodiazepines and z-drug prescribing in Australian general practice between 2011 and 2018: A national study.2011 年至 2018 年期间澳大利亚全科医疗中长期苯二氮䓬类药物和 Z 类药物处方的全国性研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022 Feb;10(1):e00896. doi: 10.1002/prp2.896.
9
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
10
Long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drugs: are we committing the denominator fallacy?长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物:我们是否在犯分母谬误?
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Oct;67(663):448. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692777.

引用本文的文献

1
Benzodiazepine and z-drug prescribing in critical care survivors and the risk of rehospitalisation or death due to falls/trauma and due to any cause: a retrospective matched cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.危重症幸存者中苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物的处方情况以及因跌倒/创伤和任何原因再次住院或死亡的风险:一项使用英国临床实践研究数据链的回顾性配对队列研究
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):125-136. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07762-4. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Sedative Prescription among Older Adults after Critical Illness: A Population-based Cohort Study.危重症后老年患者镇静处方趋势:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;210(5):680-683. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202403-0492RL.
2
Psychotropic prescribing after hospital discharge in survivors of critical illness, a retrospective cohort study (2012-2019).危重症幸存者出院后精神药物处方情况:一项回顾性队列研究(2012 - 2019年)
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Jan 19;25(2):171-180. doi: 10.1177/17511437231223470. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Less inappropriate medication: first steps in medication optimization to improve post-intensive care patient recovery.
减少不适当用药:药物优化改善重症监护后患者康复的首要步骤
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jun;50(6):982-985. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07405-8. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates.重症监护后综合征(PICS):近期进展
J Intensive Care. 2023 May 23;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00670-7.
5
Medication-related problems in critical care survivors: a systematic review.重症监护幸存者的药物相关问题:系统评价。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Sep;30(5):250-256. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003715. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
Outcomes after Critical Illness.危重症后的结局
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 9;388(10):913-924. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2104669.
7
New and Persistent Sedative Prescriptions Among Older Adults Following a Critical Illness: A Population-Based Cohort Study.老年危重症患者新开具和持续开具镇静药物处方的情况:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Chest. 2023 Jun;163(6):1425-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.033. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
8
Factors associated with potentially inappropriate opioid use in community-living older adults consulting in primary care.与初级保健中老年社区居民中潜在不适当使用阿片类药物相关的因素。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;37(8). doi: 10.1002/gps.5780.
9
Rise in prescribing for anxiety in UK primary care between 2003 and 2018: a population-based cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink.英国 2003 年至 2018 年期间初级保健中焦虑症处方量上升:一项基于人群的队列研究,使用临床实践研究数据库。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jun 30;72(720):e511-e518. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0561. Print 2022 Jul.
10
Medication-related interventions to improve medication safety and patient outcomes on transition from adult intensive care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善成人重症监护病房转出患者药物安全性及预后的药物相关干预措施:一项系统评价与Meta分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Aug;31(8):609-622. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013760. Epub 2022 Jan 18.