Mansi Elizabeth T, Rentsch Christopher T, Bourne Richard S, Jeffery Annie, Guthrie Bruce, Lone Nazir I
Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):125-136. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07762-4. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
Benzodiazepines and z-drugs are often prescribed to critical care survivors due to high prevalence of mental health problems and insomnia. However, their safety has not been studied in this population.
Retrospective cohort study of 28,678 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018: 4844 prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs, matched to 23,834 unexposed survivors using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked datasets. Multivariable stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the adjusted hazards ratio (adjHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of community benzodiazepine/z-drug prescribing and falls/trauma-related events, as well as all-cause 30-day rehospitalisation or death. We performed subgroup analyses on patients without pre-critical care admission prescription of benzodiazepines/z-drugs ('treatment-naïve'), and sensitivity analyses excluding patients receiving palliative care after discharge.
Prescription of benzodiazepines or z-drugs showed no conclusive evidence of increased risk of falls/trauma-related events in the whole cohort (adjHR 1.27; 95%CI 0.76-2.14) or in treatment-naïve individuals (adjHR 1.79; 95%CI 0.61-5.26), because estimates lacked precision due to low event rates. For all-cause rehospitalisation or death, benzodiazepines/z-drugs were associated with increased risk (whole cohort adjHR 1.24, 95%CI 1.14-1.36; treatment-naïve adjHR 1.66, 95%CI 1.49-1.86). However, after excluding patients treated for palliative care, the association persisted only in treatment-naïve individuals (whole cohort adjHR 1.08, 95%CI 0.98-1.19; treatment-naïve adjHR 1.42, 95%CI1.25-1.62).
Community benzodiazepine and z-drug prescribing was associated with increased risk of all-cause, but not falls/trauma-related, rehospitalisations and deaths in critical care survivors who had not been prescribed these before hospitalisation. Clinicians should balance the possible benefits with the likely harms of prescribing these drugs in this potentially vulnerable patient group.
由于心理健康问题和失眠的高患病率,苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物经常被开给重症监护幸存者。然而,尚未在这一人群中对其安全性进行研究。
对2010年和2018年住院的28678名成年重症监护幸存者进行回顾性队列研究:4844名使用苯二氮䓬类药物或Z类药物,通过英国临床实践研究数据链链接数据集与23834名未接触过这些药物的幸存者进行匹配。采用多变量分层Cox回归来估计社区开具苯二氮䓬类药物/Z类药物与跌倒/创伤相关事件以及全因30天再住院或死亡的调整风险比(adjHR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。我们对未在重症监护前开具过苯二氮䓬类药物/Z类药物处方的患者(“未接受过治疗”)进行了亚组分析,并进行了敏感性分析,排除出院后接受姑息治疗的患者。
开具苯二氮䓬类药物或Z类药物在整个队列(adjHR 1.27;95%CI 0.76 - 2.14)或未接受过治疗的个体中(adjHR 1.79;95%CI 0.61 - 5.26)均未显示出跌倒/创伤相关事件风险增加的确凿证据,因为由于事件发生率低,估计缺乏精确性。对于全因再住院或死亡,苯二氮䓬类药物/Z类药物与风险增加相关(整个队列adjHR 1.24,95%CI 1.14 - 1.36;未接受过治疗的个体adjHR 1.66,95%CI 1.49 - 1.86)。然而,在排除接受姑息治疗的患者后,这种关联仅在未接受过治疗的个体中持续存在(整个队列adjHR 1.08,95%CI 0.98 - 1.19;未接受过治疗的个体adjHR 1.42,95%CI 1.25 - 1.62)。
在住院前未开具过这些药物的重症监护幸存者中,社区开具苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物与全因再住院和死亡风险增加相关,但与跌倒/创伤相关事件无关。临床医生应在这一潜在脆弱患者群体中权衡开具这些药物可能带来的益处与可能的危害。