Chongmelaxme Bunchai, Yodsurang Varalee, Vichayachaipat Ponlawat, Srimatimanon Thanate, Sanmaneechai Oranee
Social and Administrative Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Gene Ther. 2024 Nov 27. doi: 10.1038/s41434-024-00503-8.
Despite numerous studies identifying the advantages of therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), healthcare professionals encounter obstacles in determining the most effective treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effects of gene-based therapy for SMA. A systematic search was conducted from inception to May 2024 across databases, and all studies assessing the effects of gene-based therapy on patients with SMA types 1 and 2 were included. The outcomes measured were survival, the need for ventilatory support, improvements in motor function, and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. A total of 57 studies (n = 3418) were included, and the meta-analyses revealed that onasemnogene abeparvovec showed the highest survival rate (95% [95% CI: 88, 100]), followed by risdiplam (86% [95% CI: 76, 94]) and nusinersen (60% [95% CI: 50, 70]). The number of patients needing ventilatory support was reduced after treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec (risk ratio = 0·10 [95% CI: 0·02, 0·53]). Onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam had similar proportions of patients with improvements in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders score of ≥4 points (92% [95% CI: 62, 100] vs 90% [95% CI: 77, 97]). In contrast, nusinersen had the smallest improvement (74% [95% CI: 66, 81]). The most frequently observed adverse drug reactions were headaches, vomiting, and gastrointestinal disorders. Gene-based therapy benefits patient survival and improves motor function. Onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam appear highly effective, whereas nusinersen exhibits moderate effectiveness.
尽管众多研究已明确脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)治疗方法的优势,但医疗保健专业人员在确定最有效的治疗方法时仍面临障碍。本研究旨在调查基于基因的SMA治疗效果。从数据库创建到2024年5月进行了系统检索,纳入了所有评估基于基因的疗法对1型和2型SMA患者效果的研究。测量的结果包括生存率、通气支持需求、运动功能改善情况以及药物不良反应的发生情况。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。共纳入57项研究(n = 3418),荟萃分析显示,onasemnogene abeparvovec的生存率最高(95%[95%CI:88, 100]),其次是risdiplam(86%[95%CI:76, 94])和nusinersen(60%[95%CI:50, 70])。使用onasemnogene abeparvovec治疗后,需要通气支持的患者数量减少(风险比 = 0·10[95%CI:0·02, 0·53])。Onasemnogene abeparvovec和risdiplam在费城儿童医院神经肌肉疾病婴儿测试评分改善≥4分的患者比例相似(92%[95%CI:62, 100]对90%[95%CI:77, 97])。相比之下,nusinersen的改善最小(74%[95%CI:66, 81])。最常观察到的药物不良反应是头痛、呕吐和胃肠道疾病。基于基因的疗法有利于患者生存并改善运动功能。Onasemnogene abeparvovec和risdiplam似乎非常有效,而nusinersen显示出中等疗效。