Suppr超能文献

评估[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在胃癌中的诊断性能:与[F]FDG PET/CT的对比研究。

Evaluating the diagnostic performance of [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in gastric cancer: a comparative study with [F]FDG PET/CT.

作者信息

Lv Jinghui, Zheng Kai, Jiang Chengzhi, Yang Jian, Peng Xiang, Ye Hui, Zhang Yanyin

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of PET-CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3314-3323. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11219-z. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic value of [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in gastric cancer.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective analysis included 65 patients with gastric cancer who received both [F]FDG and [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for initial staging or restaging. Histopathological manifestations, typical imaging manifestations, follow-up imaging, and comprehensive clinical assessment were used as reference criteria. The uptakes of [F]FDG and [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. McNemar's test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included (26 male and 39 female; mean age, 54.03 ± 10.41 years), Among them, 10 were newly diagnosed, 46 underwent radical gastrectomy, and 9 received only chemotherapy prior to the study. Compared with [F]FDG PET/CT, [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity in primary or recurrent tumors (100% vs. 64.52%, p < 0.001)), lymph node metastases (88.89% vs. 38.89%, p = 0.006), distant metastases (91.18% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). From the semi-quantitative evaluation, the Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio of [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were significantly higher than that of [F]FDG PET/CT in primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study results indicate that [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT outperforms [F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in gastric cancer.

KEY POINTS

Question Early diagnosis and precise staging of gastric cancer are crucial for patient prognosis; however, current imaging techniques still face significant limitations. Findings [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than [F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary or recurrent tumors and metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Clinical relevance [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT is an advanced imaging diagnostic technique that significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer and its metastatic lesions. This technology provides robust support for clinical decision-making, thereby improving the management of patients with gastric cancer.

摘要

目的

比较[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)与F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT在胃癌中的诊断价值。

方法

这项单中心回顾性分析纳入了65例接受[F]FDG和[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT进行初始分期或再分期的胃癌患者。以组织病理学表现、典型影像学表现、随访影像学及综合临床评估作为参考标准。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较[F]FDG和[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET的摄取情况。采用McNemar检验比较两种成像技术的诊断性能。

结果

共纳入65例患者(男性26例,女性39例;平均年龄54.03±10.41岁),其中初诊患者10例,46例行根治性胃切除术,9例在研究前仅接受化疗。与[F]FDG PET/CT相比,[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在原发性或复发性肿瘤(100%对64.52%,p<0.001)、淋巴结转移(88.89%对38.89%,p=0.006)、远处转移(91.18%对50%,p<0.001)方面显示出更高的敏感性。从半定量评估来看,[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在原发性或复发性肿瘤、淋巴结转移和远处转移中的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和靶本比均显著高于[F]FDG PET/CT(均p<0.001)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在检测胃癌原发性或复发性肿瘤、淋巴结转移和远处转移方面优于[F]FDG PET/CT。

关键点

问题 胃癌的早期诊断和精确分期对患者预后至关重要;然而,目前的成像技术仍面临重大局限性。发现 [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在检测胃癌患者的原发性或复发性肿瘤及转移方面显示出比[F]FDG PET/CT显著更高的敏感性。临床意义 [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT是一种先进的成像诊断技术,可显著提高胃癌及其转移灶的诊断准确性。该技术为临床决策提供有力支持,从而改善胃癌患者的管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41ff/12081493/42c683446ee5/330_2024_11219_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验