Lv Jinghui, Zheng Kai, Jiang Chengzhi, Yang Jian, Peng Xiang, Ye Hui, Zhang Yanyin
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Department of PET-CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3314-3323. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11219-z. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
To compare the diagnostic value of [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in gastric cancer.
This single-center retrospective analysis included 65 patients with gastric cancer who received both [F]FDG and [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for initial staging or restaging. Histopathological manifestations, typical imaging manifestations, follow-up imaging, and comprehensive clinical assessment were used as reference criteria. The uptakes of [F]FDG and [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. McNemar's test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging techniques.
A total of 65 patients were included (26 male and 39 female; mean age, 54.03 ± 10.41 years), Among them, 10 were newly diagnosed, 46 underwent radical gastrectomy, and 9 received only chemotherapy prior to the study. Compared with [F]FDG PET/CT, [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity in primary or recurrent tumors (100% vs. 64.52%, p < 0.001)), lymph node metastases (88.89% vs. 38.89%, p = 0.006), distant metastases (91.18% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). From the semi-quantitative evaluation, the Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio of [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were significantly higher than that of [F]FDG PET/CT in primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases (all p < 0.001).
Our study results indicate that [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT outperforms [F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in gastric cancer.
Question Early diagnosis and precise staging of gastric cancer are crucial for patient prognosis; however, current imaging techniques still face significant limitations. Findings [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than [F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary or recurrent tumors and metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Clinical relevance [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT is an advanced imaging diagnostic technique that significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer and its metastatic lesions. This technology provides robust support for clinical decision-making, thereby improving the management of patients with gastric cancer.
比较[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)与F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT在胃癌中的诊断价值。
这项单中心回顾性分析纳入了65例接受[F]FDG和[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT进行初始分期或再分期的胃癌患者。以组织病理学表现、典型影像学表现、随访影像学及综合临床评估作为参考标准。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较[F]FDG和[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET的摄取情况。采用McNemar检验比较两种成像技术的诊断性能。
共纳入65例患者(男性26例,女性39例;平均年龄54.03±10.41岁),其中初诊患者10例,46例行根治性胃切除术,9例在研究前仅接受化疗。与[F]FDG PET/CT相比,[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在原发性或复发性肿瘤(100%对64.52%,p<0.001)、淋巴结转移(88.89%对38.89%,p=0.006)、远处转移(91.18%对50%,p<0.001)方面显示出更高的敏感性。从半定量评估来看,[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在原发性或复发性肿瘤、淋巴结转移和远处转移中的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和靶本比均显著高于[F]FDG PET/CT(均p<0.001)。
我们的研究结果表明,[F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在检测胃癌原发性或复发性肿瘤、淋巴结转移和远处转移方面优于[F]FDG PET/CT。
问题 胃癌的早期诊断和精确分期对患者预后至关重要;然而,目前的成像技术仍面临重大局限性。发现 [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT在检测胃癌患者的原发性或复发性肿瘤及转移方面显示出比[F]FDG PET/CT显著更高的敏感性。临床意义 [F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT是一种先进的成像诊断技术,可显著提高胃癌及其转移灶的诊断准确性。该技术为临床决策提供有力支持,从而改善胃癌患者的管理。