Ding Rui, Wu Liquan, Wei Shanshan, Lu Haoran, Qin Xiaohong, Liu Xizhi, Wang Yanhua, Liu Wen, Li Huibing, Luo Baochang, Xie Teng, Chen Zhibiao
Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 99 Zhang Zhidong Street, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Department of Oncology, Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430063, China.
Proteome Sci. 2024 Nov 27;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12953-024-00236-x.
The complexity of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may require the simultaneous analysis of variant types of protein biomarkers to describe it more accurately. In this study, we analyzed for the first time the alterations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins in patients with aSAH by multi-targeted Olink proteomics, aiming to reveal the pathophysiology of DCI and provide insights into the diagnosis and treatment of aSAH.
Six aSAH patients and six control patients were selected, and CSF samples were analyzed by Olink Proteomics (including 96-neurology panel and 96-inflammation panel) based on Proximity Extension Assay (PEA). Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were acquired and bioinformatics analysis was performed.
PCA analysis revealed better intra- and inter-group reproducibility of CSF samples in the control and aSAH groups. 23 neurology-related and 31 inflammation-relevant differential proteins were identified. In the neurology panel, compared to controls, the up-regulated proteins in the CSF of SAH patients predominantly included macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1), siglec-1, siglec-9, cathepsin C (CTSC), cathepsin S (CTSS), etc. Meanwhile, in the inflammation group, the incremental proteins mainly contained interleukin-6 (IL-6), MCP-1, CXCL10, CXCL-9, TRAIL, etc. Cluster analysis exhibited significant differences in differential proteins between the two groups. GO function enrichment analysis hinted that the differential proteins pertinent to neurology in the CSF of SAH patients were mainly involved in the regulation of defense response, vesicle-mediated transport and regulation of immune response; while the differential proteins related to inflammation were largely connected with the cellular response to chemokine, response to chemokine and chemokine-mediated signaling pathway. Additionally, in the neurology panel, KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that the differential proteins were significantly enriched in the phagosome, apoptosis and microRNAs in cancer pathway. And in the inflammation panel, the differential proteins were mainly enriched in the chemokine signaling pathway, viral protein interaction with cytokine and cytokine receptor and toll-like receptor signaling pathway.
These identified differential proteins reveal unique pathophysiological characteristics secondary to aSAH. Further characterization of these proteins and aberrant pathways in future research could enable their application as potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers for DCI after aSAH.
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后迟发性脑缺血(DCI)的复杂性可能需要同时分析多种类型的蛋白质生物标志物,以便更准确地描述它。在本研究中,我们首次通过多靶点Olink蛋白质组学分析了aSAH患者脑脊液(CSF)蛋白质的变化,旨在揭示DCI的病理生理学,并为aSAH的诊断和治疗提供见解。
选取6例aSAH患者和6例对照患者,基于邻近延伸分析(PEA),采用Olink蛋白质组学(包括96-神经学面板和96-炎症面板)对脑脊液样本进行分析。获取差异表达蛋白(DEPs)并进行生物信息学分析。
主成分分析(PCA)显示,对照组和aSAH组脑脊液样本在组内和组间具有更好的重复性。鉴定出23种与神经学相关的差异蛋白和31种与炎症相关的差异蛋白。在神经学面板中,与对照组相比,SAH患者脑脊液中上调的蛋白主要包括巨噬细胞清道夫受体1(MSR1)、唾液酸结合凝集素-1、唾液酸结合凝集素-9、组织蛋白酶C(CTSC)、组织蛋白酶S(CTSS)等。同时,在炎症组中,增加的蛋白主要包含白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1、CXC趋化因子配体10、CXC趋化因子配体-9、肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)等。聚类分析显示两组差异蛋白存在显著差异。基因本体(GO)功能富集分析提示,SAH患者脑脊液中与神经学相关的差异蛋白主要参与防御反应调节、囊泡介导的转运和免疫反应调节;而与炎症相关的差异蛋白主要与细胞对趋化因子的反应、对趋化因子的反应以及趋化因子介导的信号通路有关。此外,在神经学面板中,京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)富集分析表明差异蛋白在吞噬体、凋亡和癌症中的微小RNA通路中显著富集。在炎症面板中,差异蛋白主要富集在趋化因子信号通路、病毒蛋白与细胞因子和细胞因子受体的相互作用以及Toll样受体信号通路中。
这些鉴定出的差异蛋白揭示了aSAH继发的独特病理生理特征。在未来的研究中进一步表征这些蛋白和异常通路,可能使其作为aSAH后DCI的潜在治疗靶点和生物标志物得以应用。