Suppr超能文献

左心室排气对心源性休克患者急性脑损伤的影响:体外生命支持组织注册分析

Impact of Left Ventricular Venting on Acute Brain Injury in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Analysis.

作者信息

Feng Shi Nan, Liu Winnie L, Kang Jin Kook, Kalra Andrew, Kim Jiah, Zaqooq Akram, Vogelsong Melissa A, Kim Bo Soo, Brodie Daniel, Brown Patricia, Whitman Glenn J R, Keller Steven, Cho Sung-Min

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Nov 23:2024.11.20.24317676. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.20.24317676.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While left ventricular (LV) venting reduces LV distension in cardiogenic shock patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), it may also amplify risk of acute brain injury (ABI). We investigated the hypothesis that LV venting is associated with increased risk of ABI. We also compared ABI risk of the two most common LV venting strategies, percutaneous microaxial flow pump (mAFP) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP).

METHODS

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry was queried for patients on peripheral VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock (2013-2024). ABI was defined as hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, ischemic stroke, or intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary outcome was hospital mortality. We compared no LV venting with 1) LV venting, 2) mAFP, and 3) IABP using multivariable logistic regression. To compare ABI risk of mAFP vs. IABP, propensity score matching was performed.

RESULTS

Of 13,276 patients (median age=58.2, 69.9% male), 1,456 (11.0%) received LV venting (65.5% mAFP and 29.9% IABP), and 525 (4.0%) had ABI. After multivariable regression, LV-vented patients had increased odds of ABI (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.76, 95% CI=1.29, 2.37, p<0.001) but no difference in mortality (aOR=1.08, 95% CI=0.91-1.28, p=0.39) compared to non-LV-vented patients. In the propensity- matched cohort of IABP (n=231) vs. mAFP (n=231) patients, there was no significant difference in odds of ABI (aOR=1.35, 95%CI=0.69-2.71, p=0.39) or mortality (aOR=0.88, 95%CI=0.58-1.31, p=0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

LV venting was associated with increased odds of ABI but not mortality in patients receiving peripheral VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock. There was no difference in odds of ABI or mortality for IABP vs. mAFP patients.

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

In patients receiving peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock, left ventricular venting is associated with increased odds of acute brain injury (ABI) but not mortality. However, mode of venting-intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous microaxial flow pump (mAFP)-does not appear to impact either odds of ABI or mortality. These findings highlight a link between venting strategies and neurological outcomes in this high-risk population. Clinicians must weigh the benefits of venting against ABI risk when managing neurocritically ill patients, though our findings provide reassurance clinicians that both IABP and mAFP may offer comparable neurologic safety profiles.

摘要

背景

虽然左心室(LV)排气可减轻心源性休克患者在静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)治疗时的左心室扩张,但它也可能增加急性脑损伤(ABI)的风险。我们研究了LV排气与ABI风险增加相关的假说。我们还比较了两种最常用的LV排气策略,即经皮微轴流泵(mAFP)和主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)的ABI风险。

方法

查询体外生命支持组织登记处中因心源性休克接受外周VA-ECMO治疗的患者(2013 - 2024年)。ABI定义为缺氧缺血性脑损伤、缺血性中风或颅内出血。次要结局是医院死亡率。我们使用多变量逻辑回归比较了不进行LV排气与1)LV排气、2)mAFP和3)IABP的情况。为比较mAFP与IABP的ABI风险,进行了倾向评分匹配。

结果

在13276例患者(中位年龄 = 58.2岁,69.9%为男性)中,1456例(11.0%)接受了LV排气(65.5%为mAFP,29.9%为IABP),525例(4.0%)发生了ABI。多变量回归后,与未进行LV排气的患者相比,进行LV排气的患者发生ABI的几率增加(调整后的优势比(aOR)= 1.76,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.29,2.37,p < 0.001),但死亡率无差异(aOR = 1.08,95% CI = 0.91 - 1.28,p = 0.39)。在IABP(n =

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验