Ma L J, Yu X H, Yin D, Zhu Y J, Wang Y, Zhao Y J
Dental Department, People ' s Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan750002, China.
Center of Digital Dentistry, Faculty of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing100081, China.
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 9;59(12):1234-1239. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240625-00250.
To explore the impact of digital technology in constructing a three-dimensional (3D) symmetry reference plane (SRP) for esthetic restoration of anterior teeth and to evaluate its clinical applicability. A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to May 2024, involving 20 patients [11 males and 9 females, aged (36.8±11.4) years] who underwent anterior esthetic restorations at the Department of Stomatology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Symmetrical reference planes of patients' 3D facial models were constructed using three different algorithms: weighted Procrustes analysis (WPA), Procrustes analysis (PA) based on the ontology-mirror correlation method, and iterative closest point (ICP). The SRP defined by an associate chief physician served as the control (true-value group). The angular errors between each algorithm group and the true-value group were compared. The optimal algorithm was selected and combined with a three-dimensional digital smile design (DSD) to create virtual patients, followed by designing anterior restorations. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used by patients to score the aesthetic restoration results of the conventional design (control group) and the algorithm-based design (algorithm group). The angular errors of the WPA, PA, and ICP groups were 1.43°±0.66°, 1.82°±0.88°, and 4.74°±2.03° respectively, with statistically significant differences among the groups (=41.10, <0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed that the WPA group had significantly smaller angular errors compared to the PA and ICP groups (<0.05). The VAS scores for aesthetic restoration were significantly higher in the algorithm group (8.09±0.74) compared to the control group (6.30±1.38) (=-5.49, <0.001). The SRP constructed using the WPA algorithm demonstrated minimal angular error when compared to the expert-defined SRP and is considered the optimal choice in clinical practice, yielding high patient satisfaction.
探讨数字技术在构建用于前牙美学修复的三维(3D)对称参考平面(SRP)中的作用,并评估其临床适用性。于2024年2月至5月进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了20例患者[11例男性和9例女性,年龄(36.8±11.4)岁],这些患者在宁夏回族自治区人民医院口腔科接受了前牙美学修复。使用三种不同算法构建患者3D面部模型的对称参考平面:加权普罗克汝斯分析(WPA)、基于本体镜像相关方法的普罗克汝斯分析(PA)和迭代最近点(ICP)。由副主任医师定义的SRP作为对照(真值组)。比较各算法组与真值组之间的角度误差。选择最佳算法并与三维数字微笑设计(DSD)相结合创建虚拟患者,然后设计前牙修复体。患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对传统设计(对照组)和基于算法的设计(算法组)的美学修复结果进行评分。WPA组、PA组和ICP组的角度误差分别为1.43°±0.66°、1.82°±0.88°和4.74°±2.03°,组间差异有统计学意义(=41.10,<0.001)。两两比较显示,WPA组的角度误差明显小于PA组和ICP组(<0.05)。算法组美学修复的VAS评分(平均值8.09±0.74)明显高于对照组(平均值6.30±1.38)(=-5.49,<0.001)。与专家定义的SRP相比,使用WPA算法构建的SRP角度误差最小,被认为是临床实践中的最佳选择,患者满意度高。