Suppr超能文献

用于成人癌症治疗的生物类似单克隆抗体。

Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment in adults.

机构信息

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Pharmaceutical Science Graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 28;11(11):CD013539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013539.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biosimilars are products containing an approved biological medicine. They are similar, but not identical, to an originator medicine. In cancer, biosimilars have been developed from the monoclonal antibodies, bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab. They have become available for the treatment of lung, colorectal, non-Hodkin's lymphoma, and breast cancers. As these biological products are not identical, synthesis of evidence of the clinical effects of biosimilars compared to their originators is needed to understand their comparative effectiveness and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies versus their originator drugs for adults with cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched bibliographic (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) and clinical trials databases to February 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included head-to-head randomised controlled trials conducted in adults with cancer treated with biosimilar or originator monoclonal antibodies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard Cochrane methodology. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, breast cancer's pathological complete response, serious adverse events, and health-related quality of life. If survival estimates were adjusted or provided as rates, we did not combine them. We used Cochrane's RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to evaluate the certainty of evidence of critical and important outcomes according to the relevance determined by consumers.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 55 studies with 22,046 adults (23 of bevacizumab, 10,639 participants with colorectal or lung cancer; 17 of rituximab, 4412 participants with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; and 15 of trastuzumab, 6995 participants with breast cancer). Studies were conducted in all continents, most were multicentre, and all were funded by the drug manufacturer. Participants' ages ranged from 47 (mean) to 62 (median) years and the proportion of women from 18% to 100%. Fifteen studies were conducted as non-inferiority and 40 as equivalence. The overall risk of bias was low; main biases were in the incomplete outcome data and selective reporting domains. Bevacizumab biosimilar versus bevacizumab originator in lung or colorectal cancer Progression-free survival is likely similar between bevacizumab biosimilar and the originator (per 1000: 380 in both groups at 12 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.09; 5 studies, 2660 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in lung or colorectal cancer subgroups. Bevacizumab biosimilar is likely similar to the originator in duration of response (per 1000: 219 participants who achieved response progressed with biosimilar versus 210 with originator at 12 months; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.37; 1 study, 762 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and overall survival (per 1000: 592 with biosimilar versus 610 with originator at 12 months; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.19; 5 studies, 2783 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in cancer type subgroups. Bevacizumab biosimilar is likely similar to the originator in serious adverse events (per 1000: 303 with biosimilar versus 309 with originator; risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.03; 23 studies, 10,619 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab biosimilar may be similar to originator in health-related quality of life as scores were comparable in the one study that assessed this outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (low-certainty evidence). This critical outcome was not assessed in other biosimilars comparisons. Bevacizumab biosimilar is likely similar to originator in objective response (per 1000: 481 with biosimilar versus 501 with originator; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.00; 23 studies, 10,054 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and mortality (per 1000: 287 with biosimilar versus 279 with originator; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.09; 19 studies, 9231 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in lung or colorectal cancers. Rituximab biosimilar versus rituximab originator in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Rituximab biosimilar is likely similar to originator in progression-free survival (7 studies, 2456 participants), duration of response (2 studies, 522 participants), and overall survival (7 studies, 2353 participants; data not pooled as survival estimates were adjusted for different factors or reported as rates) (all moderate-certainty evidence). Rituximab biosimilar is likely similar to originator in the risk of serious adverse events (per 1000: 210 with biosimilar versus 204 with originator; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.14; 15 studies, 4197 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and objective response (per 1000: 807 with biosimilar versus 799 with originator; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04; 16 studies, 3922 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No study reported quality of life. Rituximab biosimilar is similar to originator in mortality (per 1000: 52 with biosimilar versus 53 with originator; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.35; 8 studies, 2557 participants; high-certainty evidence). Trastuzumab biosimilar versus trastuzumab originator in breast cancer Trastuzumab biosimilar is likely similar to originator in progression-free survival (4 studies, 2221 participants), duration of response (3 studies, 1488 participants), and overall survival (6 studies, 2221 participants), which were not pooled due to adjustment for different factors or provided as rates. No study reported quality of life. Trastuzumab biosimilar may be similar to originator in pathological complete response (per 1000: 459 with biosimilar versus 433 with originator; RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.17; 7 studies, 3403 participants; low-certainty evidence), is likely similar in serious adverse events (per 1000: 129 in both groups; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17; 13 studies, 6183 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and slightly increases objective response (per 1000: 801 with biosimilar versus 777 with originator; RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05; 13 studies, 5509 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab biosimilars are likely similar to their originator drugs in terms of their impact on progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, serious adverse events, objective response, and mortality. Limited evidence showed similarity in pathological complete response for trastuzumab and quality of life for bevacizumab compared with originators, which was not assessed in the other comparisons. The overall certainty of evidence was moderate and imprecision was the main reason for downgrading our certainty in the findings.

摘要

背景

生物仿制药是指含有已批准的生物医学产品。它们与原创药相似,但并不完全相同。在癌症中,生物仿制药已经从单克隆抗体,贝伐珠单抗、利妥昔单抗和曲妥珠单抗中开发出来。它们已被用于治疗肺癌、结直肠癌、非霍奇金淋巴瘤和乳腺癌。由于这些生物制品并非完全相同,因此需要综合比较生物仿制药和原创药的临床效果证据,以了解其相对有效性和危害。

目的

评估生物类似物单克隆抗体与原创药相比在癌症成人患者中的获益和危害。

检索方法

我们检索了截止到 2024 年 2 月的 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science 等文献数据库和临床试验数据库。

纳入标准

我们纳入了头对头随机对照试验,这些试验将生物类似物或原创者单克隆抗体用于癌症成人患者。

数据收集与分析

我们遵循了标准的 Cochrane 方法。主要结局指标包括无进展生存期、缓解持续时间、总生存期、乳腺癌的病理完全缓解、严重不良事件和健康相关生活质量。如果生存估计值经过调整或作为比率提供,则我们不进行合并。我们使用 Cochrane 的 RoB 1 工具评估偏倚风险,并根据消费者确定的相关性使用 GRADE 评估关键和重要结局指标的证据确定性。

主要结果

我们纳入了 55 项研究,涉及 22046 名成年人(23 项研究涉及贝伐珠单抗,其中 62%的参与者患有结直肠癌或肺癌;10639 名参与者患有非霍奇金淋巴瘤;17 项研究涉及利妥昔单抗,其中 4412 名参与者患有非霍奇金淋巴瘤;15 项研究涉及曲妥珠单抗,其中 6995 名参与者患有乳腺癌)。这些研究在各大洲都有开展,大多数为多中心研究,所有研究均由药物制造商资助。参与者的年龄从 47 岁(平均)到 62 岁(中位数)不等,女性比例从 18%到 100%不等。15 项研究为非劣效性研究,40 项为等效性研究。整体偏倚风险较低;主要偏倚存在于不完全结局数据和选择性报告领域。贝伐珠单抗生物类似物与贝伐珠单抗原创药在肺癌或结直肠癌中的比较无进展生存期:贝伐珠单抗生物类似物与原创药之间可能相似(12 个月时两组各有 380 人进展,HR 1.00,95%CI 0.91 至 1.09;5 项研究,2660 名参与者;中等确定性证据);在肺癌或结直肠癌亚组中无差异。贝伐珠单抗生物类似物在缓解持续时间方面可能与原创药相似(12 个月时,1 项研究中,219 名接受治疗的患者出现缓解,而生物类似物组有 210 名,HR 1.05,95%CI 0.81 至 1.37;1 项研究,762 名参与者;中等确定性证据)和总生存期(12 个月时,592 名接受生物类似物治疗的患者和 610 名接受原创药治疗的患者,HR 1.06,95%CI 0.94 至 1.19;5 项研究,2783 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。在癌症类型亚组中无差异。贝伐珠单抗生物类似物与原创药在严重不良事件方面可能相似(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 303 人,原创药组有 309 人,RR 0.98,95%CI 0.93 至 1.03;23 项研究,10619 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。在健康相关生活质量方面,贝伐珠单抗生物类似物可能与原创药相似,因为在评估转移性结直肠癌的这一结局的一项研究中,评分相似(低确定性证据)。在其他生物类似物比较中未评估这一关键结局。贝伐珠单抗生物类似物在客观反应(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 481 人,原创药组有 501 人,RR 0.96,95%CI 0.93 至 1.00;23 项研究,10054 名参与者;中等确定性证据)和死亡率(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 287 人,原创药组有 279 人,RR 1.03,95%CI 0.97 至 1.09;19 项研究,9231 名参与者;中等确定性证据)方面可能与原创药相似。在肺癌或结直肠癌中无差异。利妥昔单抗生物类似物与利妥昔单抗原创药在非霍奇金淋巴瘤中的比较无进展生存期:利妥昔单抗生物类似物与原创药之间可能相似(7 项研究,2456 名参与者)、缓解持续时间(2 项研究,522 名参与者)和总生存期(7 项研究,2353 名参与者;数据未汇总,因为生存估计值经过了不同因素的调整或报告为比率)(所有均为中等确定性证据)。利妥昔单抗生物类似物与原创药在严重不良事件风险方面可能相似(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 210 人,原创药组有 204 人,RR 1.03,95%CI 0.94 至 1.14;15 项研究,4197 名参与者;中等确定性证据)和客观反应(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 807 人,原创药组有 799 人,RR 1.01,95%CI 0.98 至 1.04;16 项研究,3922 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。没有研究报告生活质量。利妥昔单抗生物类似物在死亡率方面与原创药相似(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 52 人,原创药组有 53 人,RR 0.97,95%CI 0.70 至 1.35;8 项研究,2557 名参与者;高确定性证据)。曲妥珠单抗生物类似物与曲妥珠单抗原创药在乳腺癌中的比较无进展生存期:曲妥珠单抗生物类似物与原创药之间可能相似(4 项研究,2221 名参与者)、缓解持续时间(3 项研究,1488 名参与者)和总生存期(6 项研究,2221 名参与者;未进行汇总,因为生存估计值经过了不同因素的调整或报告为比率)。没有研究报告生活质量。曲妥珠单抗生物类似物在病理完全缓解方面可能与原创药相似(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 459 人,原创药组有 433 人,RR 1.06,95%CI 0.95 至 1.17;7 项研究,3403 名参与者;低确定性证据),在严重不良事件方面可能相似(12 个月时,两组各有 129 人,RR 1.00,95%CI 0.85 至 1.17;13 项研究,6183 名参与者;中等确定性证据),并且在客观反应方面可能略有增加(12 个月时,生物类似物组有 801 人,原创药组有 777 人,RR 1.03,95%CI 1.01 至 1.05;13 项研究,5509 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。

作者结论

与原创药相比,贝伐珠单抗、利妥昔单抗和曲妥珠单抗生物类似物在进展无进展生存期、缓解持续时间、总生存期、乳腺癌的病理完全缓解、严重不良事件、客观反应和死亡率方面可能相似。有限的证据表明,曲妥珠单抗在病理完全缓解方面与原创药相似,贝伐珠单抗在生活质量方面与原创药相比可能相似,而其他比较中未评估这些结局。总体证据确定性为中等,不精确性是降低我们对发现的确定性的主要原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验