• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗阴道分娩疼痛的处方和镇痛效果的流行率。

Prevalence of prescription and effectiveness of analgesia for treating vaginal delivery pain.

机构信息

Maternidade Maria da Conceição de Jesus. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

University of Washington. Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Nov 22;77(5):e20230327. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327
PMID:39607194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11653877/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to assess pain management during labor.

METHODS

a cross-sectional study was carried out by reviewing medical records and conducting postpartum interviews. Prevalence and effectiveness of analgesia were assessed.

RESULTS

the prevalence of non-pharmacological analgesia was 61.86% of 215 women in labor in Obstetric Center and 82.51% of 62 in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of severe pain, on the Visual Analogue Scale, before and after non-pharmacological analgesia, was from 92.16% to 64.04% (p=0.00) in Obstetric Center and from 85.96% to 52.63% (p=0.01) in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesia in Obstetric Centers was 15.81%, with no variation in severe pain (p=0.57). Patients' request for analgesia was associated with education (p=0.00) and pain intensity (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

non-pharmacological analgesia improved pain intensity. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesic prescription was lower than that identified in developed countries. Pain management needs to consider the preferences and needs of women in labor.

摘要

目的

评估分娩过程中的疼痛管理。

方法

通过回顾病历和进行产后访谈进行了一项横断面研究。评估了镇痛的流行率和效果。

结果

在产科中心,215 名分娩妇女中,非药物性镇痛的流行率为 61.86%,62 名助产士主导单位的流行率为 82.51%。在产科中心,非药物性镇痛前后视觉模拟量表上严重疼痛的流行率从 92.16%降至 64.04%(p=0.00),在助产士主导单位从 85.96%降至 52.63%(p=0.01)。产科中心的药物性镇痛流行率为 15.81%,严重疼痛无变化(p=0.57)。患者对镇痛的需求与教育(p=0.00)和疼痛强度(p=0.02)有关。

结论

非药物性镇痛可改善疼痛强度。药物性镇痛处方的流行率低于发达国家。疼痛管理需要考虑分娩妇女的偏好和需求。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of prescription and effectiveness of analgesia for treating vaginal delivery pain.治疗阴道分娩疼痛的处方和镇痛效果的流行率。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Nov 22;77(5):e20230327. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327. eCollection 2024.
2
Quality of analgesic care in labor: A cross-sectional study of the first national register-based benchmarking system.分娩镇痛质量:首个全国基于登记的基准测试系统的横断面研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;166(3):1077-1085. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15489. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
The comparison of the effect of non-pharmacological pain relief and pharmacological analgesia with remifentanil on fear of childbirth and postpartum depression: a randomized controlled clinical trial.非药物性疼痛缓解与瑞芬太尼药物镇痛对分娩恐惧和产后抑郁影响的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06270-z.
4
The Relationship Between Women's Intention to Request a Labor Epidural Analgesia, Actually Delivering With Labor Epidural Analgesia, and Postpartum Depression at 6 Weeks: A Prospective Observational Study.《前瞻性观察研究:女性要求分娩硬膜外镇痛的意愿、实际使用分娩硬膜外镇痛与产后 6 周抑郁的关系》。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1590-1597. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002501.
5
Acute pain and analgesic requirement after vaginal childbirth with and without neuraxial labor analgesia-Retrospective cohort study.分娩后有无椎管内分娩镇痛的急性疼痛和镇痛需求:回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 18;18(4):e0284106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284106. eCollection 2023.
6
Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial.序贯应用非药物干预措施可减轻分娩疼痛的严重程度,延迟药物镇痛的使用,并改善一些产科结局:一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2018 Jan;64(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
Maternal quality of life in routine labor epidural analgesia versus labor analgesia on request: results of a randomized trial.常规分娩硬膜外镇痛与按需分娩镇痛对产妇生活质量的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2027-2033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1838-z. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Practice Bulletin No. 177: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia.第177号实践公告:产科镇痛与麻醉
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):e73-e89. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002018.
9
Practice Bulletin No. 177 Summary: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia.第177号实践公告摘要:产科镇痛与麻醉
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):766-768. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002009.
10
Real-time analgesic efficacy and factors determining drug requirements of combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: a prospective cohort study.实时镇痛效果和决定分娩联合脊髓-硬膜外镇痛药物需求的因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Anesth. 2024 Oct;38(5):656-665. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03368-8. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Anesthesia practices for management of labor pain and cesarean delivery in France (EPIDOL): A cross-sectional survey.法国分娩疼痛管理与剖宫产的麻醉实践(EPIDOL):一项横断面调查。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Dec;42(6):101302. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101302. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
High maternal mortality rates in Brazil: Inequalities and the struggle for justice.巴西的高孕产妇死亡率:不平等与正义之争。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Oct;14:100343. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100343. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
No pain management for labour: individual and organisational determinants: A secondary analysis of the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey.分娩时不进行疼痛管理:个体和组织决定因素:2016 年法国全国围产调查的二次分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Jun 1;39(6):489-497. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001682.
4
Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery and Severe Maternal Morbidity.分娩时使用椎管内分娩镇痛与严重产妇不良结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220137. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0137.
5
Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates.剖宫产率的趋势和预测:全球和区域估计。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
6
Delivery care by obstetric nurses in maternity hospitals linked to the Rede Cegonha, Brazil - 2017.巴西 Rede Cegonha 合作型医院助产士提供的分娩护理-2017 年。
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Mar;26(3):919-929. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232021263.28482020. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
7
Obstetric anesthesia services in Israel snapshot (OASIS) study: a 72 hour cross-sectional observational study of workforce supply and demand.以色列产科麻醉服务快照(OASIS)研究:72 小时横断面观察性研究劳动力供需情况。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Mar 15;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00460-2.
8
Analgesia for vaginal birth: Secondary analysis from the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.分娩镇痛:世界卫生组织母婴健康多国家调查的二次分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):401-408. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13424. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
9
The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises.修订后的国际疼痛研究协会疼痛定义:概念、挑战和妥协。
Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.
10
Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.女性在分娩过程中使用药物和非药物缓解疼痛方法的体验:一项定性系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4.