Suppr超能文献

体外观察托槽脱落对牙釉质表面的影响:光学相干断层扫描评估

Effect of tube debonding on the enamel surface in vitro : Evaluation with optical coherence tomography.

作者信息

Park Kyung-Jin, Löffler Viktor, Riemekasten Sandra, Ziebolz Dirk, Schneider Hartmut, Haak Rainer

机构信息

Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Aug;86(Suppl 1):92-99. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00561-y. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In vitro evaluation of the morphology of the enamel surface before bonding metal tubes and after debonding using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and light microscopy.

METHODS

In all, 40 extracted caries-free human molars without defects were selected and cleaned. The tooth surfaces were imaged by light microscopy and SD-OCT prior to the placement of metal tubes (Titanium Orthos; Ormco, Brea, CA, USA). The metal tubes were bonded to the teeth using four adhesive systems: group 1) BrackFix Primer SE with BrackFix adhesive, group 2) BrackFix Primer with BrackFix adhesive (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany), group 3) Transbond Plus SE Primer with Transbond XT adhesive, group 4) Transbond XT Primer with Transbond XT adhesive (reference, 3M Deutschland, Neuss, Germany). After tube removal, the bonded areas were imaged by light microscopy and/or OCT and evaluated according to the following four criteria: (1) depth of cohesive enamel defect, (2) enamel cracks, (3) adhesive residue after tube removal, and (4) adhesive residues after polishing.

RESULTS

None of the groups had enamel defects or enamel cracks. Group 1 showed significantly less adhesive residue after tube removal than the other groups (p ≤ 0.014). There were no significant differences between the groups for adhesive residues after polishing (p ≥ 0.628). Adhesive residues, if present, were only detectable by OCT and covered less than 1% of the enamel surfaces evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Tube removal did not cause clinically relevant enamel damage such as chipping or cracking.

摘要

目的

采用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)和光学显微镜对金属管粘结前及脱粘后牙釉质表面形态进行体外评估。

方法

共选取40颗无龋、无缺陷的离体人磨牙并进行清洁。在放置金属管(Titanium Orthos;美国加利福尼亚州布雷亚市奥美科公司)之前,用光镜和SD-OCT对牙面进行成像。使用四种粘结系统将金属管粘结到牙齿上:第1组)BrackFix Primer SE搭配BrackFix粘结剂,第2组)BrackFix Primer搭配BrackFix粘结剂(德国库克斯港VOCO公司),第3组)Transbond Plus SE Primer搭配Transbond XT粘结剂,第4组)Transbond XT Primer搭配Transbond XT粘结剂(对照,德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州诺伊斯市3M德国公司)。去除金属管后,用光镜和/或OCT对粘结区域进行成像,并根据以下四个标准进行评估:(1)牙釉质粘结性缺陷深度,(2)牙釉质裂纹,(3)去除金属管后的粘结剂残留,(4)抛光后的粘结剂残留。

结果

所有组均未出现牙釉质缺陷或牙釉质裂纹。第1组去除金属管后的粘结剂残留明显少于其他组(p≤0.014)。各组抛光后的粘结剂残留无显著差异(p≥0.628)。如有粘结剂残留,仅能通过OCT检测到,且覆盖的评估牙釉质表面不到1%。

结论

去除金属管未造成临床上相关的牙釉质损伤,如崩裂或开裂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验