Suppr超能文献

经胫骨隧道抽出修复术改善了内侧半月板后根部斜形撕裂患者的短期临床疗效,与放射状根部撕裂相当。

Transtibial pullout repair improved short-term clinical outcomes in patients with oblique medial meniscus posterior root tear comparable to radial root tear.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Red Cross Hospital, 2-1-1 Aoe, Kita-Ku, Okayama City, Okayama, 700-8607, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Nov 28;35(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04137-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRT) can lead to excessive knee loading and unsatisfactory clinical outcomes after non-operative treatment or meniscectomy. Although favourable clinical outcomes after MM posterior root (PR) repair have been reported, no study has specifically investigated the outcomes of different types of MMPRT. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with complete radial and oblique MMPRT following MMPR repair.

METHODS

Forty patients who had undergone MMPR repair were retrospectively investigated. Patients with type 2 (20 knees) and 4 MMPRT (20 knees) were included in this study. The MMPRT type was classified according to the LaPrade classification. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance images, arthroscopic findings, and pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, clinical outcomes notably improved in patients with type 2 and 4 MMPRT. No significant differences were observed in any of the evaluations between these patients, both before and after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patients with type 2 and type 4 MMPRT exhibited significantly improved clinical outcomes. MMPR repair is beneficial in treating type 2 and type 4 MMPRT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

内侧半月板(MM)后根撕裂(PRT)可导致非手术治疗或半月板切除术后膝关节过度负荷和临床效果不满意。虽然 MM 后根(PR)修复后有良好的临床效果,但尚无研究专门探讨不同类型 MMPRT 的结果。本研究旨在比较 MMPR 修复后完全放射状和斜行 MMPRT 患者的临床结果。

方法

回顾性调查了 40 例行 MMPR 修复的患者。本研究纳入了 20 例(20 膝)2 型和 4 型 MMPRT 患者。根据 LaPrade 分类对 MMPRT 类型进行分类。评估术前和术后的平片、磁共振成像、关节镜检查结果和临床结果。

结果

术后 1 年,2 型和 4 型 MMPRT 患者的临床结果明显改善。在手术前后,这些患者在所有评估中均无显著差异。

结论

2 型和 4 型 MMPRT 患者的临床结果显著改善。MMPR 修复有利于治疗 2 型和 4 型 MMPRT。

证据水平

IV。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11604777/1ce851175d59/590_2024_4137_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验