School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Bradford, UK.
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 28;89(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02065-1.
Studies of perception, cognition, and action increasingly rely on measures derived from the movements of a cursor to investigate how psychological processes unfold over time. This method is one of the most sensitive measures available for remote experiments conducted online, but experimenters have little control over the input device used by participants, typically a mouse or trackpad. These two devices require biomechanically distinct movements to operate, so measures extracted from cursor tracking data may differ between input devices. We investigated this in two online experiments requiring participants to execute goal-directed movements. We identify several measures that are critically influenced by the choice of input device using a kinematic decomposition of the recorded cursor trajectories. Those using a trackpad were slower to acquire targets, mainly attributable to greater times required to initiate movements and click on targets, despite showing greater peak speeds and lower variability in their movements. We believe there is a substantial risk that behavioural disparities caused by the input device used could be misidentified as differences in psychological processes. We urge researchers to collect data on input devices in online experiments and carefully consider and account for the effect they may have on their experimental data.
研究感知、认知和行为的科学越来越依赖于从光标运动中得出的测量方法,以研究心理过程如何随时间展开。这种方法是在线远程实验中最敏感的测量方法之一,但实验者对参与者使用的输入设备几乎没有控制,通常是鼠标或触摸板。这两种设备需要不同的生物力学运动来操作,因此从光标跟踪数据中提取的测量值可能因输入设备而异。我们通过要求参与者执行目标导向运动的两项在线实验研究了这一点。我们通过记录光标轨迹的运动学分解来确定几个受输入设备选择影响较大的测量值。使用触摸板的参与者获取目标的速度较慢,主要归因于启动运动和点击目标所需的时间更长,尽管它们的运动速度更快,变化更小。我们认为,使用输入设备引起的行为差异很可能被错误地识别为心理过程的差异。我们敦促研究人员在在线实验中收集有关输入设备的数据,并仔细考虑和解释它们可能对实验数据产生的影响。