Kim Se Hee, Kang Hoon-Chul, Roh Yun Ho, Hahn Jongsung, Min Kyung Lok, Lee Seok-Jin, Yang Donghwa, Choi Han Som, Park Soyoung, Lee Jeong Ho, Lee Sang-Guk, Kim Se Hoon, Chang Min Jung, Kim Heung Dong
Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Children's Hospital, Epilepsy Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Feb;10(1):243-257. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13104. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of everolimus in treating seizures associated with focal cortical dysplasia type 2 (FCD 2).
A prospective, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03198949) enrolled patients aged 4-40 years with pathologically confirmed FCD 2 and a history of ≥3 seizures per month for two out of the 3 months prior to screening. The trial included a 4-week baseline phase, two 12-week core phases, and a 29-week extension phase. Patients received everolimus or placebo in a blinded manner during core phase I, with crossover to the alternate treatment in core phase II. Everolimus dosage started at 4.5 mg/m/day, targeting a serum level of 5-15 ng/mL. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% seizure reduction from baseline in the last month of each core phase. Safety profiles were compared between groups.
Between May 11, 2017, and June 19, 2020, 21 patients completed the core phases. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between everolimus and placebo groups (24% vs. 19%, p = 0.66). The patients showed varied responses. Three patients with a pathogenic variant in the MTOR gene or no genetic abnormalities achieved seizure freedom with everolimus in the last month of the core phase, while none of the patients with variants in other genes did. Adverse events, such as mucositis or skin ulceration, were more common with everolimus (19/21 vs. 7/21, p < 0.001). All adverse events resolved without study drug withdrawal.
Everolimus treatment for 12 weeks did not show overall superiority in reducing seizures compared to placebo. However, it showed promise, mostly in patients with a pathogenic variant in the MTOR gene, highlighting the need for further research into patient-specific factors influencing treatment response. The everolimus treatment was generally safe and manageable.
This study tested everolimus for reducing seizures in patients with focal cortical dysplasia type 2 (FCD 2). While the drug was not more effective than a placebo for most, few patients showed better results, with some becoming seizure-free. Side effects were common but manageable. More research is needed to understand why certain patients respond better to treatment.
本研究旨在评估依维莫司治疗2型局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD 2)相关癫痫发作的有效性和安全性。
一项前瞻性、交叉、安慰剂对照临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03198949)纳入了年龄在4至40岁之间、经病理证实为FCD 2且在筛查前3个月中有2个月每月癫痫发作≥3次的患者。该试验包括一个4周的基线期、两个12周的核心期和一个29周的延长期。在核心期I,患者以盲法接受依维莫司或安慰剂治疗,在核心期II交叉接受替代治疗。依维莫司剂量起始为4.5 mg/m/天,目标血清水平为5至15 ng/mL。主要结局是在每个核心期的最后一个月中癫痫发作较基线减少≥50%的患者比例。比较了两组的安全性概况。
在2017年5月11日至2020年6月19日期间,21名患者完成了核心期。依维莫司组和安慰剂组的主要结局无显著差异(24%对19%,p = 0.66)。患者表现出不同的反应。3名MTOR基因有致病变异或无基因异常的患者在核心期的最后一个月使用依维莫司实现了无癫痫发作,而其他基因有变异的患者均未实现。依维莫司组的不良事件如口腔炎或皮肤溃疡更为常见(19/21对7/21,p < 0.001)。所有不良事件均在未停用研究药物的情况下得到缓解。
与安慰剂相比,依维莫司治疗12周在减少癫痫发作方面未显示出总体优越性。然而,它显示出了前景,主要是在MTOR基因有致病变异的患者中,这突出了需要进一步研究影响治疗反应的患者特异性因素。依维莫司治疗总体上是安全且可管理的。
本研究测试了依维莫司对2型局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD 2)患者减少癫痫发作的效果。虽然该药物对大多数患者并不比安慰剂更有效,但少数患者效果更好,有些实现了无癫痫发作。副作用很常见但可管理。需要更多研究来了解为什么某些患者对治疗反应更好。