Suppr超能文献

伴用布瓦西坦治疗成人局灶性癫痫发作控制不佳:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验的结果。

Adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy: results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Hospices Civils de Lyon and TIGER, CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS 5292, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2014 Jan;55(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/epi.12432. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a novel high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand in clinical development for the treatment of epilepsy. This phase III study (N01252; NCT00490035) evaluated the efficacy and safety/tolerability of BRV (20, 50, and 100 mg/day) compared with placebo (PBO) in patients aged 16-70 years with uncontrolled focal seizures with/without secondary generalization, despite treatment with one to two concomitant antiepileptic drugs at a stable and optimal dosage.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted across Europe and India. Eligible patients had two or more focal seizures/month for 3 months prior to screening and eight or more focal seizures during the 8-week prospective baseline. Concomitant use of levetiracetam was limited to 20% of randomized patients. Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to BRV 20, 50, 100 mg/day or PBO with no up-titration for 12 weeks, followed by down-titration or entry into a long-term follow-up study. The primary efficacy end point was percent reduction over PBO in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/week over the 12-week treatment period. Comparison of BRV with PBO was sequential to control for multiplicity (50, 100, 20 mg/day), and thus required BRV to demonstrate superiority over PBO at 50 mg/day to meet the primary efficacy end point. Secondary efficacy variables were median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/week, ≥50% responder rate, and seizure freedom (all seizure types). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

KEY FINDINGS

Of 399 randomized patients, 398 were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and safety populations. Overall, 367 (92.2%) of 398 patients completed the study (BRV: 93.9%, 88.9%, and 94.0% for 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively; PBO: 92.0%) and 345 (86.7%) of 398 patients continued into long-term follow-up studies (BRV: 87.9%, 82.8%, and 88.0% for 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively; PBO: 88.0%). The study did not meet its primary efficacy end point based on the predefined sequential testing strategy. Indeed, percent reduction over PBO in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/week (primary efficacy analysis) was 6.8% (p = 0.239), 6.5% (p = 0.261), and 11.7% (p = 0.037) for BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively. Median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/week was 30.0% (p = 0.019), 26.8% (p = 0.092), and 32.5% (p = 0.004) for BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively, compared with 17.0% for PBO. Responder rates (≥50%) were 27.3% (p = 0.339), 27.3% (p = 0.372), and 36.0% (p = 0.023) for BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively, compared with 20.0% for PBO. Complete seizure freedom was reported by 2/99, 0/99, and 4/100 patients on BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively, compared with 0/100 on PBO. The incidence of TEAEs was higher for BRV 20 (56/99, 56.6%), 50 (62/99, 62.6%), and 100 mg/day (63/100, 63.0%) than PBO (53/100, 53.0%); most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most frequently reported TEAEs in the BRV groups were headache, somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this study of adjunctive BRV (20-100 mg/day) in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures, the primary efficacy analysis based on the 50 mg/day dose was not statistically significant. However, BRV 100 mg/day reduced baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/week by 11.7% over PBO, achieving statistical significance (p = 0.037). Secondary efficacy analyses (percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/week, ≥50% responder rate) provided supportive evidence for the efficacy of BRV 100 mg/day. BRV 20-100 mg/day was well tolerated without up-titration, with a high completion rate.

摘要

目的

布瓦西坦(BRV)是一种新型的高亲和力突触囊泡蛋白 2A 配体,目前正在开发用于治疗癫痫。这项 III 期研究(N01252;NCT00490035)评估了 BRV(20、50 和 100mg/天)与安慰剂(PBO)相比在年龄为 16-70 岁、有不受控制的局灶性发作(伴有或不伴有继发性全面性发作)的患者中的疗效和安全性/耐受性,这些患者尽管接受了一种至两种同时使用的抗癫痫药物治疗,但剂量稳定且最佳。

方法

这是一项在欧洲和印度进行的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。符合条件的患者在筛选前的 3 个月内每月有 2 次或更多的局灶性发作,在 8 周的前瞻性基线期内有 8 次或更多的局灶性发作。同时使用左乙拉西坦的患者限制在随机患者的 20%。患者按 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分为 BRV 20、50、100mg/天或 PBO 组,12 周内不进行滴定,然后进行滴定或进入长期随访研究。主要疗效终点是 12 周治疗期间基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周与 PBO 相比的百分比降低。与 PBO 比较 BRV 的顺序比较是为了控制多重性(50、100、20mg/天),因此需要 BRV 在 50mg/天的疗效优于 PBO,才能达到主要疗效终点。次要疗效变量是基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的中位数百分比降低、≥50%的应答率和无发作(所有发作类型)。安全性评估包括治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。

主要发现

在 399 名随机患者中,398 名患者被纳入意向治疗(ITT)和安全性人群。总的来说,398 名患者中有 367 名(92.2%)完成了研究(BRV:93.9%、88.9%和 94.0%,分别为 20、50 和 100mg/天;PBO:92.0%),345 名(86.7%)患者继续进入长期随访研究(BRV:87.9%、82.8%和 88.0%,分别为 20、50 和 100mg/天;PBO:88.0%)。该研究没有达到其主要疗效终点,这是基于预先设定的序贯测试策略。事实上,与 PBO 相比,基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的百分比降低(主要疗效分析)分别为 6.8%(p=0.239)、6.5%(p=0.261)和 11.7%(p=0.037),分别为 BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天。与 PBO 相比,基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的中位数百分比降低分别为 30.0%(p=0.019)、26.8%(p=0.092)和 32.5%(p=0.004),BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天。与 PBO 相比,应答率(≥50%)分别为 27.3%(p=0.339)、27.3%(p=0.372)和 36.0%(p=0.023),BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天,而 PBO 为 20.0%。BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天的患者分别有 2/99、0/99 和 4/100 报告完全无发作,而 PBO 为 0/100。BRV 20(56/99,56.6%)、50(62/99,62.6%)和 100mg/天(63/100,63.0%)的 TEAEs 发生率高于 PBO(53/100,53.0%);大多数 TEAEs 为轻度或中度。BRV 组中最常报告的 TEAEs 是头痛、嗜睡、头晕和疲劳。

意义

在这项 BRV(20-100mg/天)辅助治疗成人局灶性发作的研究中,基于 50mg/天剂量的主要疗效分析没有统计学意义。然而,BRV 100mg/天与 PBO 相比,使基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周减少了 11.7%,达到统计学意义(p=0.037)。次要疗效分析(基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的百分比降低,≥50%的应答率)为 BRV 100mg/天的疗效提供了支持证据。BRV 20-100mg/天无需滴定即可耐受,完成率高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验