Hospices Civils de Lyon and TIGER, CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS 5292, Lyon, France.
Epilepsia. 2014 Jan;55(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/epi.12432. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
Brivaracetam (BRV) is a novel high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand in clinical development for the treatment of epilepsy. This phase III study (N01252; NCT00490035) evaluated the efficacy and safety/tolerability of BRV (20, 50, and 100 mg/day) compared with placebo (PBO) in patients aged 16-70 years with uncontrolled focal seizures with/without secondary generalization, despite treatment with one to two concomitant antiepileptic drugs at a stable and optimal dosage.
This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted across Europe and India. Eligible patients had two or more focal seizures/month for 3 months prior to screening and eight or more focal seizures during the 8-week prospective baseline. Concomitant use of levetiracetam was limited to 20% of randomized patients. Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to BRV 20, 50, 100 mg/day or PBO with no up-titration for 12 weeks, followed by down-titration or entry into a long-term follow-up study. The primary efficacy end point was percent reduction over PBO in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/week over the 12-week treatment period. Comparison of BRV with PBO was sequential to control for multiplicity (50, 100, 20 mg/day), and thus required BRV to demonstrate superiority over PBO at 50 mg/day to meet the primary efficacy end point. Secondary efficacy variables were median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/week, ≥50% responder rate, and seizure freedom (all seizure types). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Of 399 randomized patients, 398 were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and safety populations. Overall, 367 (92.2%) of 398 patients completed the study (BRV: 93.9%, 88.9%, and 94.0% for 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively; PBO: 92.0%) and 345 (86.7%) of 398 patients continued into long-term follow-up studies (BRV: 87.9%, 82.8%, and 88.0% for 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively; PBO: 88.0%). The study did not meet its primary efficacy end point based on the predefined sequential testing strategy. Indeed, percent reduction over PBO in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/week (primary efficacy analysis) was 6.8% (p = 0.239), 6.5% (p = 0.261), and 11.7% (p = 0.037) for BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively. Median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/week was 30.0% (p = 0.019), 26.8% (p = 0.092), and 32.5% (p = 0.004) for BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively, compared with 17.0% for PBO. Responder rates (≥50%) were 27.3% (p = 0.339), 27.3% (p = 0.372), and 36.0% (p = 0.023) for BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively, compared with 20.0% for PBO. Complete seizure freedom was reported by 2/99, 0/99, and 4/100 patients on BRV 20, 50, and 100 mg/day, respectively, compared with 0/100 on PBO. The incidence of TEAEs was higher for BRV 20 (56/99, 56.6%), 50 (62/99, 62.6%), and 100 mg/day (63/100, 63.0%) than PBO (53/100, 53.0%); most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most frequently reported TEAEs in the BRV groups were headache, somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.
In this study of adjunctive BRV (20-100 mg/day) in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures, the primary efficacy analysis based on the 50 mg/day dose was not statistically significant. However, BRV 100 mg/day reduced baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/week by 11.7% over PBO, achieving statistical significance (p = 0.037). Secondary efficacy analyses (percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/week, ≥50% responder rate) provided supportive evidence for the efficacy of BRV 100 mg/day. BRV 20-100 mg/day was well tolerated without up-titration, with a high completion rate.
布瓦西坦(BRV)是一种新型的高亲和力突触囊泡蛋白 2A 配体,目前正在开发用于治疗癫痫。这项 III 期研究(N01252;NCT00490035)评估了 BRV(20、50 和 100mg/天)与安慰剂(PBO)相比在年龄为 16-70 岁、有不受控制的局灶性发作(伴有或不伴有继发性全面性发作)的患者中的疗效和安全性/耐受性,这些患者尽管接受了一种至两种同时使用的抗癫痫药物治疗,但剂量稳定且最佳。
这是一项在欧洲和印度进行的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。符合条件的患者在筛选前的 3 个月内每月有 2 次或更多的局灶性发作,在 8 周的前瞻性基线期内有 8 次或更多的局灶性发作。同时使用左乙拉西坦的患者限制在随机患者的 20%。患者按 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分为 BRV 20、50、100mg/天或 PBO 组,12 周内不进行滴定,然后进行滴定或进入长期随访研究。主要疗效终点是 12 周治疗期间基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周与 PBO 相比的百分比降低。与 PBO 比较 BRV 的顺序比较是为了控制多重性(50、100、20mg/天),因此需要 BRV 在 50mg/天的疗效优于 PBO,才能达到主要疗效终点。次要疗效变量是基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的中位数百分比降低、≥50%的应答率和无发作(所有发作类型)。安全性评估包括治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。
在 399 名随机患者中,398 名患者被纳入意向治疗(ITT)和安全性人群。总的来说,398 名患者中有 367 名(92.2%)完成了研究(BRV:93.9%、88.9%和 94.0%,分别为 20、50 和 100mg/天;PBO:92.0%),345 名(86.7%)患者继续进入长期随访研究(BRV:87.9%、82.8%和 88.0%,分别为 20、50 和 100mg/天;PBO:88.0%)。该研究没有达到其主要疗效终点,这是基于预先设定的序贯测试策略。事实上,与 PBO 相比,基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的百分比降低(主要疗效分析)分别为 6.8%(p=0.239)、6.5%(p=0.261)和 11.7%(p=0.037),分别为 BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天。与 PBO 相比,基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的中位数百分比降低分别为 30.0%(p=0.019)、26.8%(p=0.092)和 32.5%(p=0.004),BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天。与 PBO 相比,应答率(≥50%)分别为 27.3%(p=0.339)、27.3%(p=0.372)和 36.0%(p=0.023),BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天,而 PBO 为 20.0%。BRV 20、50 和 100mg/天的患者分别有 2/99、0/99 和 4/100 报告完全无发作,而 PBO 为 0/100。BRV 20(56/99,56.6%)、50(62/99,62.6%)和 100mg/天(63/100,63.0%)的 TEAEs 发生率高于 PBO(53/100,53.0%);大多数 TEAEs 为轻度或中度。BRV 组中最常报告的 TEAEs 是头痛、嗜睡、头晕和疲劳。
在这项 BRV(20-100mg/天)辅助治疗成人局灶性发作的研究中,基于 50mg/天剂量的主要疗效分析没有统计学意义。然而,BRV 100mg/天与 PBO 相比,使基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周减少了 11.7%,达到统计学意义(p=0.037)。次要疗效分析(基线调整后的局灶性发作频率/周的百分比降低,≥50%的应答率)为 BRV 100mg/天的疗效提供了支持证据。BRV 20-100mg/天无需滴定即可耐受,完成率高。