CARA Network, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2430507. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2430507. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
National Action Plans (NAPs) aim to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR) understanding and awareness but struggle to translate targets into clinically relevant guidance for general practice.
To identify and map antibiotic use targets in European general practice and explore if and how these targets are linked to NAPs.
A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE and SCOPUS, with additional manual searches. The research questions were: What are existing targets for antibiotic use in general practice in the 31 European countries? and How are these targets linked to the NAPs on AMR?. The results are presented narratively.
77 reports were included, of which 33 focused on national targets and general practice or linking national and local targets. Reports describe local strategies to achieve targets, such as prescriber feedback, benchmarking systems and financial incentives. However, these reports provide aggregated targets for general practice, such as a percentage reduction of antibiotics prescribed. These targets are set in general, for a specific type of antibiotic, for an amount per number of patients, in defined daily doses or items. None of the reports translate national targets into clinically relevant or practical targets for general practitioners.
Most European countries have an NAP with established targets, but the type and implementation of these targets vary between nations. Translating national targets into daily clinical practice is challenging and often lacks the involvement of prescribers. Aligning national and local targets would enhance coherence and more effectively contribute to improvements in antibiotic use.
国家行动计划(NAPs)旨在提高对抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)的认识,但在将目标转化为一般实践中临床相关的指导方面存在困难。
确定并绘制欧洲一般实践中抗生素使用的目标,并探讨这些目标是否以及如何与 NAPs 相关联。
在 MEDLINE(OVID)、EMBASE 和 SCOPUS 中进行了系统搜索,并进行了额外的手动搜索。研究问题是:在 31 个欧洲国家中,一般实践中现有的抗生素使用目标是什么?这些目标如何与 AMR 的 NAPs 相关联?结果以叙述的方式呈现。
共纳入 77 份报告,其中 33 份报告重点关注国家目标和一般实践或国家和地方目标的联系。报告描述了实现目标的当地策略,如处方反馈、基准系统和经济激励。然而,这些报告仅为一般实践提供了汇总目标,例如规定的抗生素使用量减少百分比。这些目标通常是针对特定类型的抗生素、每个患者的数量、特定的日剂量或项目设定的。没有一份报告将国家目标转化为一般执业医师的临床相关或实际目标。
大多数欧洲国家都有制定了目标的 NAP,但这些目标的类型和实施在各国之间存在差异。将国家目标转化为日常临床实践具有挑战性,而且往往缺乏处方者的参与。协调国家和地方目标将增强一致性,并更有效地促进抗生素使用的改善。