Dumont B, Barlagne C, Cassart P, Duval J E, Fanchone A, Gourdine J-L, Huguenin-Elie O, Kazakova Y, Klötzli J, Lüscher A, Oteros-Rozas E, Pomies D, Rivera Ferre M G, Rossing W A H, Stefanova V, Swartebroeckx A, Zagaria C
INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
INRAE, UR ASTRO Agrosystèmes Tropicaux, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), France.
Animal. 2025 Feb;19 Suppl 1:101367. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101367. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
Agroecology is among the most promising options to alleviate the negative impacts of animal farming on the environment and build local food systems based on ethically acceptable production methods. So far, most of the research on agroecological animal production systems was conducted at farm scale, and the potential of agroecological principles addressing social dimensions and food system-level approaches has been underexplored. Here, we analyse how the whole set of agroecological principles was mobilised in five case studies on grassland-based, silvopastoral or integrated crop-livestock systems in Switzerland, Guadeloupe, French uplands, Bulgaria and Andalucía. Following a multilevel perspective, we propose a new eight-category framework to categorise barriers and enablers in these different socioecological contexts, and discuss the implications of these results for scaling out and scaling up agroecological niche innovations in animal production areas. Though we could observe activities related to each agroecological principle in each case study, the relative importance of each principle differed. For instance, in Switzerland, the focus was on ecological processes operating in multispecies mixtures, and therefore on mobilising principles of input reduction, synergy, soil health and biodiversity, while in Andalucía, a civil society organisation, a regional agricultural office, researchers, and farmers mainly mobilised transformational principles at the food system level, e.g. social values, connectivity and participation. Such contrasts highlight how agroecology allows different equilibria among principles, adapting to the needs of farmers and local communities. Inadequate infrastructure and lack of technology were frequently reported as barriers to agroecological transitions. Policy needs to go beyond the mere support of agroecological practices on livestock farms and adopt a systems approach looking downstream and upstream if it is to enable a large-scale agroecological transition with EU public policies. Market as an enabler was linked to direct sales and short distribution circuits, generating added value to the benefit of local communities. Most agroecological systems benefited from a positive image among citizens and consumers, but cultural barriers resulted from change in product characteristics, e.g. veal meat colour in dairy system that promote long-lasting cow-calf contact. All case studies were very advanced in the social dimensions of agroecology, and cooperation networks were always reported among the enablers for scaling out. The multiactor network approach fostered knowledge exchange between farmers, researchers and citizens, and allowed participants to share values. Long-term commitment from local practitioners is required so that co-designed solutions are implemented, which can strengthen the economic and social viability of animal production areas.
农业生态学是减轻畜牧业对环境负面影响并基于道德可接受的生产方式建立地方粮食系统的最具潜力的选择之一。到目前为止,大多数关于农业生态动物生产系统的研究都是在农场规模上进行的,而农业生态原则在解决社会层面和粮食系统层面方法方面的潜力尚未得到充分探索。在此,我们分析了瑞士、瓜德罗普岛、法国高地、保加利亚和安达卢西亚关于草地型、林牧型或农牧结合型系统的五个案例研究中,整套农业生态原则是如何被运用的。从多层次视角出发,我们提出了一个新的八类框架,对这些不同社会生态背景下的障碍和促进因素进行分类,并讨论这些结果对扩大和推广动物生产领域的农业生态小众创新的影响。尽管在每个案例研究中我们都能观察到与每项农业生态原则相关的活动,但每项原则的相对重要性有所不同。例如,在瑞士,重点是多物种混合中运行的生态过程,因此侧重于调动减少投入、协同作用、土壤健康和生物多样性等原则,而在安达卢西亚,一个民间社会组织、一个地区农业办公室、研究人员和农民主要在粮食系统层面调动变革性原则,如社会价值观、连通性和参与度。这种对比凸显了农业生态学如何在原则之间实现不同的平衡,以适应农民和当地社区的需求。基础设施不足和技术缺乏经常被报告为农业生态转型的障碍。如果欧盟公共政策要实现大规模的农业生态转型,政策需要超越对畜牧场农业生态实践的单纯支持,采取一种上下游兼顾的系统方法。作为促进因素的市场与直销和短分销渠道相关联,为当地社区创造附加值。大多数农业生态系统在公民和消费者中享有良好形象,但产品特性的变化导致了文化障碍,例如促进奶牛与小牛长期接触的奶牛养殖系统中的小牛肉颜色。所有案例研究在农业生态学的社会层面都非常先进,并且在扩大推广的促进因素中总是提到合作网络。多行为体网络方法促进了农民、研究人员和公民之间的知识交流,并使参与者能够共享价值观。需要当地从业者的长期承诺,以便实施共同设计的解决方案,这可以增强动物生产地区的经济和社会活力。